Assignment 2: Impression Management

Assignment 2 Impression Managementimpression Management Is Something

Impression management is a process individuals employ to influence how others perceive them, often to achieve specific goals. These goals can range from appearing likable or competent to gaining control or power in social or professional situations. In some cases, individuals may self-handicap — intentionally creating obstacles to explain potential failure — to protect their self-image by attributing failure to external factors rather than personal incompetence. Understanding when and why impression management is used, along with recognizing its successes and failures, can offer valuable insights into social interactions and personal behavior.

Personally, I am most likely to use impression management in professional settings, such as during job interviews or presentations. In these situations, projecting competence and confidence can significantly influence the outcome and increase opportunities for career advancement. Conversely, I am less inclined to use impression management in informal, personal interactions with close friends or family, where authenticity and genuine connection are more valued than strategic image-building.

The primary difference between these two situations lies in the stakes and the context. In professional scenarios, the goal is often to create a favorable impression that can lead to tangible benefits such as a job offer or professional respect. There, impression management is a strategic tool. In personal settings, authenticity tends to take precedence, and efforts to manipulate perceptions may be viewed as insincere or unnecessary.

An example of when I successfully used impression management was during a university presentation. I prepared thoroughly, dressed professionally, and used confident body language and clear articulation. The outcome was positive; my presentation received commendation, and I felt a sense of pride in demonstrating competence. The success stemmed from genuine preparation combined with a strategic presentation style to maximize impact.

On the other hand, I recall a situation where I attempted to impress a new colleague by overstating my experience in a particular skill. This attempt failed because my overconfidence was immediately apparent, leading to a loss of credibility. The outcome was awkward, and I felt embarrassed. The failure was due to a lack of authenticity; my attempt at impression management backfired because it was not aligned with my true abilities, and this mismatch was detectable.

In this unsuccessful scenario, using a self-handicapping strategy might have been more beneficial. For instance, I could have acknowledged a limitation or lack of experience upfront, framing it as an area of eager learning. This approach might have set realistic expectations and elicited understanding and support rather than skepticism. A common self-handicapping strategy involves preemptively attributing possible failure to external factors, such as lack of experience, which can preserve self-esteem even if the outcome is less favorable.

However, regularly resorting to self-handicapping strategies poses risks. It can undermine self-confidence, diminish others’ perception of competence, and create a cycle of perceived inadequacy. Over time, reliance on such strategies can hinder personal growth and reduce opportunities for genuine success, as individuals may avoid taking risks or demonstrating true abilities, fearing failure or rejection. Furthermore, persistent self-handicapping can damage credibility and trust in both professional and personal relationships.

Conclusion

Impression management is a vital aspect of social interaction that can serve both beneficial and detrimental purposes. When used appropriately, it helps create favorable perceptions and achieve personal goals. However, overuse or insincere application can lead to negative outcomes, particularly if strategies such as self-handicapping become habitual. Striking a balance—embracing authenticity while strategically managing impressions—can foster genuine relationships and personal development, while minimizing the risks associated with manipulative tactics.

References

• Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.
• Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-54.
• Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. Psychological Perspectives on the Self, 1, 231-261.
• Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3-26.
• Keith, K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). The science of persuasion: The art of influence. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 63-70.
• Swann, W. B., Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. American Psychologist, 38(9), 1043-1053.
• Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulses and impressions: A review of self- and other-perceptions of personality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(1), 108-127.
• Hall, J. A., & Matsumoto, D. (2004). Gender differences in judgments of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(4), 239-258.
• Jones, E. E. (1964). States of self-presentation: Strategies for impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(2), 103-112.
• Friesen, D. W. (1972). Cultural differences in display of emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 78(3), 464-473.