Assignment 2: LASA 1: Final Project: Early Methods Section D

Assignment 2: LASA 1: Final Project: Early Methods Section Due

In your final paper for this course, you will need to write a Methods section that is about 4 pages long where you will assess and evaluate the methods of research. In preparation for this particular section, answer the following questions thoroughly and provide justification/support. The more complete and detailed your answers for these questions, the better prepared you are to successfully write your final paper. Please submit your answers as a single 4- to 6-page document as a numbered list; this will ensure you do not inadvertently miss a question.

Additionally, please submit a title page and a reference page in proper APA format. What is your research question? What is your hypothesis or hypotheses? What is the null hypothesis? How many participants would you like to use and why?

What are the inclusion characteristics, i.e., what must they have in order to be included in your study (for example, gender, diagnosis, age, personality traits, etc.)? Are there any exclusion characteristics, i.e., are there certain characteristics that would exclude them from being in your study? Does the sample need to be diverse? Why or why not? What sampling technique will be used to collect your sample?

What population does your sample generalize to? What are the variables in your study? HINT: Refer back to your hypothesis or hypotheses. Provide operational definitions for each variable. How will you measure each variable?

Discuss the reliability and validity of these measures in general terms. What technique will be used for data collection (e.g., observation, survey, interview, archival, etc.)? What type of research design is being used? Briefly discuss the procedure that would be followed when conducting the research. What are some POTENTIAL ethical issues? How might they be addressed?

Paper For Above instruction

The pursuit of understanding human behavior and mental processes necessitates meticulous attention to the research methods employed. Clarifying research questions, hypotheses, sample selection, measurement strategies, and ethical considerations forms the backbone of rigorous scientific inquiry. In designing a hypothetical study, it is essential to articulate each aspect thoroughly, ensuring the methodology aligns with the research goals and adheres to ethical standards.

Research Question and Hypotheses

The primary research question guiding this hypothetical study is: "Does mindfulness meditation reduce stress levels among college students?" The hypothesis posits that participants engaged in a mindfulness meditation program will experience a significant decrease in perceived stress compared to a control group. The null hypothesis states that there will be no difference in stress levels between the meditation and control groups, indicating that mindfulness meditation has no effect on stress reduction.

Participants, Sample Size, and Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

The study proposes recruiting 100 college students aged 18 to 25 years, representing both genders and diverse racial backgrounds to enhance generalizability. The inclusion criteria specify students currently enrolled full-time, experiencing moderate stress levels as assessed by a preliminary screening questionnaire. Exclusion criteria would include individuals with diagnosed severe mental health disorders, ongoing psychotherapy, or prior extensive experience with meditation practices, to avoid confounding variables.

The sample aims to be diverse to ensure results are applicable across different demographic groups, aligning with broader educational and psychological research standards. The sampling technique employed will be stratified random sampling, ensuring balanced representation across gender, ethnicity, and academic majors, thereby improving the external validity of the findings.

Generalizability and Variables

The results from this sample will generalize to the population of college students within similar demographic and psychological profiles, specifically those experiencing moderate stress levels. The key variables include:

  • Independent Variable: Type of intervention (mindfulness meditation vs. control). Operationally, meditation is defined as participating in a 30-minute guided session daily for four weeks, while the control group receives no intervention.
  • Dependent Variable: Perceived stress levels, measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Operationally, this involves a 10-item questionnaire with Likert-scale responses assessing stress over the past month.

Reliability, Validity, and Measurement

The Perceived Stress Scale demonstrates high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80) and construct validity in various populations, supporting its reliability and validity for measuring perceived stress. The meditation intervention's fidelity can be verified through adherence logs and session recordings, ensuring consistency across participants.

Data Collection Technique and Research Design

Data will be collected using self-report questionnaires administered before and after the intervention period. The study employs a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, allowing causal inferences about the effect of mindfulness meditation on stress levels. Random assignment to the intervention or control groups mitigates selection biases and confounding variables.

Research Procedure

Participants will first complete baseline assessments, including demographic questionnaires and the PSS. They will then be randomly assigned to the meditation group or control group. The meditation group will engage in guided sessions daily for four weeks, while the control group continues their usual activities. Post-intervention assessments will be conducted immediately after the four-week period, measuring changes in perceived stress. Follow-up assessments at eight weeks may evaluate sustained effects.

Ethical Considerations

Potential ethical issues include ensuring informed consent, confidentiality, and the right to withdraw without penalty. Participants will be debriefed about the study's purpose and can withdraw at any point. To address potential psychological distress, participants will be provided with resources for mental health support. The study protocol will be reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to ensure compliance with ethical standards and protect participant welfare.

Conclusion

This hypothetical research design demonstrates an ethically sound, methodologically rigorous approach to examining the impact of mindfulness meditation on stress among college students. By defining clear variables, employing reliable measures, and ensuring ethical treatment, the study aims to contribute valuable insights to clinical psychology and educational interventions.

References

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.
  • Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Fortin, G., Masse, M., Therien, P., Bouchard, V., ... & Hofmann, S. G. (2013). Mindfulness-based therapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(6), 763–771.
  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.
  • Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 35–43.
  • Saraswathi, M., & Arunachalam, R. (2018). Effects of mindfulness on stress reduction among college students. Journal of American College Health, 66(3), 259–265.
  • Shapiro, S. L., Astin, J. A., Bishop, S. R., & Cordova, M. (2005). Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Health Care Professionals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(6), 1001–1011.
  • Meiklejohn, J., Phillips, C., Freedman, M. L., Griffin, M. L., Biegel, G., Roach, A., ... & Isherwood, M. (2012). Integrating mindfulness training into K-12 education: Fostering the resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness, 3(4), 291–307.
  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.
  • Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(5), 593–600.
  • Davidson, R. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: stress and intervention. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 689–695.

Related Assignments