Assignment 2 Lasa 1 Literature Review Paper: The Purp 835044

Assignment 2 Lasa 1 Literature Review Paperthe Purpose Of This Ass

The purpose of this assignment is to provide you with the opportunity to select a topic in the particular area in which you have an occupational or research interest, and to complete a literature review of the topic, using a minimum of ten scholarly references. This will allow you to demonstrate mastery of the program outcomes for the B.A. psychology program at Argosy University. A helpful Web site for organizing and writing a literature review is You may also want to review the following documents that are available in the Doc Sharing area of the course: · A sample literature review, · a PowerPoint document illustrating how to set up your word processor for APA style · a “Guide for Writing a Literature Review”. Based on your review of the most recent, relevant research findings on your chosen topic, submit a final version of your literature review paper, integrating feedback received from your instructor.

Be sure to include a research/focal question, synthesis of the literature you reviewed, well-established conclusions, and points of discussion and/or future research. Begin the review by defining the objective of the paper. Introduce the reader to your focal question. What is this question intended to address? You may state your “question” in the form of a problem if you like.

Describe the topic for your literature review and why you chose this topic. Explain why you think it is important. It is also useful to tell the reader how the review is organized in your introduction section, before you transition into the body of the review. Organize your literature review paper by themes/theories/concepts, rather than article by article. If there is one major theme you want to highlight, state the theme.

If there are three major themes or streams of thought on the topic, briefly name them—and then organize the balance of your literature review around those three streams. Think of themes, theories, concepts, lines of thought, and ideas as organizing strategies for your literature review. Your creativity in this assignment is not the content or findings but the clarity with which you organize the review and create a context for understanding the focal question. When you are done introducing the first line of thought, create a new paragraph to discuss studies which present another line of thought or opposing view. Your literature review should hit the high points of each article.

You should not discuss a single article, one by one, like a grocery list. Zero in on the main theme or finding and then move on to the next theme. Remember, this is a synthesis, an integration of all the things you have learned. You are creating a discussion on paper, which in turn gives the reader a context for understanding where the scholarship has been, where it is currently, and where it likely will be heading next. Provide enough details to help the reader understand the significance of the studies you cite without “rebuilding Rome.” Be sure to evaluate the studies and offer critical comments on any shortcomings you’ve observed or that have been reported by the authors.

Discuss the main findings and their implications. Given the results of your literature review, what is/are the prevailing argument(s)? What research question could you ask in order to further develop this area of study and contribute to the existing body of knowledge? Complete your review by drawing conclusions about your body of research and identifying gaps in the research which still remain to be explored, maybe even by you! Make an argument as to why your research question is important and relevant to the current work being done on your topic.

Apply current APA standards for editorial style, expression of ideas, and formatting of the text, headings, citations, and references. Remember to use your own words to describe and evaluate the articles. Avoid quoting the material and also cite works when you are discussing someone else’s ideas. Your paper should be double-spaced and in 12 point, Times New Roman font with normal one-inch margins, written in APA style, and free of typographical and grammatical errors. It should include a title page with a running head, an abstract and a reference page.

The body of the paper should be no less than 5–6 pages in length. Submit your review paper to the M3: Assignment 2 Dropbox by Wednesday, September 20, 2017.

Paper For Above instruction

A comprehensive literature review on [Your Chosen Topic]: Exploring Recent Trends and Future Directions

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of psychology, understanding the nuanced interplays between cognitive processes and behavioral outcomes remains paramount. This literature review aims to synthesize recent research findings on [your focal question], a critical inquiry addressing how [briefly specify the problem or phenomenon]. The importance of this topic is underscored by its implications for [specific field, e.g., clinical interventions, educational strategies, etc.], and advances in this area could lead to more effective applications and theoretical models. The review is organized into three primary themes: [Theme 1], [Theme 2], and [Theme 3], each representing a distinct stream of thought that collectively contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Theme 1: [Major Theme or Concept]

This section synthesizes studies focused on [describe theme], highlighting key findings such as [briefly describe significant results]. For instance, [Author et al., Year] demonstrated that [main findings], which suggest [interpretation or implication]. Critical evaluation reveals limitations, including [shortcomings], which indicate the need for further research to confirm these results across diverse populations or contexts.

Theme 2: [Major Theme or Concept]

Research concerning [second theme] emphasizes [discuss notable findings], as exemplified by [Author et al., Year], who found that [main findings]. Opposing perspectives, such as those in [another study], argue [counterpoint], illustrating ongoing debates within the field. These divergent views underscore the importance of methodological rigor and the potential influence of contextual variables.

Theme 3: [Major Theme or Concept]

The third stream of thought explores [describe theme], with key studies like [Author et al., Year] revealing that [findings]. Critical analysis suggests that while these studies advance understanding, limitations such as [shortcomings] exist, pointing to the necessity for future investigations to refine these models or theories.

Discussion of Key Findings and Implications

The synthesis of research indicates that [main conclusion], with implications for [application, theory, or practice]. For example, [specific study] demonstrates that [result], which could influence [practical application]. These findings collectively highlight the evolving understanding of [topic], emphasizing areas where consensus exists and highlighting unresolved issues.

Future Research Directions

Given the identified gaps, future research could explore [suggested avenues], particularly focusing on [specific variables, populations, or contexts]. Investigating [new question] could contribute to refining theoretical models and developing more effective interventions, thus advancing the field in meaningful ways.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this review underscores the significance of [topic], the progress made through recent research, and the critical gaps that remain. Addressing these gaps through targeted future studies will enhance understanding and application, ultimately benefiting [relevant field or population]. The proposed research questions are designed to fill these gaps, fostering continued growth in this vital area of psychology.

References

• Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year). Title of the scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, D. D., & Author, E. E. (Year). Title of another relevant article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, F. F. (Year). Title of a foundational book. Publisher.
• Author, G. G., & Author, H. H. (Year). Title of a recent meta-analysis. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, I. I. (Year). Title of a key empirical study. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, J. J., & Author, K. K. (Year). Review article on the topic. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, L. L. (Year). Theoretical perspectives in psychology. Publisher.
• Author, M. M., & Author, N. N. (Year). Cross-cultural research findings. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, O. O. (Year). Recent advancements in the field. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx
• Author, P. P., & Author, Q. Q. (Year). Methodological review relevant to the topic. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx