Assignment 3 Research Application Discussion: The Current Ra

Assignment 3 Research Application Discussionthe Current Ratio Measure

Assignment 3: Research Application Discussion The current ratio measures the degree to which current assets cover current liabilities. A high ratio indicates a good probability that the company can retire current debt. When long term debt exceeds stockholder's equity, the current ratio will fall. What effect will reclassifying a long term investment into cash within one year have on the current ratio? Is a firm's true financial position stronger as a result of reclassifying investments?

What are the ethical ramifications of re-classifying investments? Give an example of when reclassifying a long term investment as a short term investment makes financial sense for the company. By Saturday, June 3, 2017 respond to the discussion questions. Submit your response to the appropriate Discussion Area. Use the same Discussion Area to comment on your classmates' submissions and continue the discussion until Wednesday, June 7, 2017. Comment on how your classmates would address differing views.

Paper For Above instruction

The current ratio is a fundamental financial metric used to evaluate a company's liquidity, indicating its ability to meet short-term obligations using its most liquid assets. It is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities. A higher current ratio generally signifies a stronger liquidity position, suggesting that the firm can comfortably settle its short-term liabilities. Conversely, a lower ratio may indicate liquidity challenges, which could potentially threaten the company's short-term financial health.

Reclassifying a long-term investment as a short-term asset—specifically, as cash or cash equivalents—within a one-year period directly impacts the current ratio. This reclassification increases current assets temporarily, which, in turn, elevates the current ratio. An improved current ratio suggests a stronger liquidity position; however, this increase does not necessarily reflect an actual improvement in the company's financial health. Instead, it is a matter of how assets are categorized on the balance sheet. Reclassification can be viewed as a manipulation of financial statements if not justified by the company's operational realities.

The true financial strength of a firm does not inherently improve through such reclassifications. While the current ratio may improve, the underlying liquidity position remains unchanged if the reclassified investment does not convert into actual cash within the next year. It is essential for investors and stakeholders to dig deeper beyond surface ratios and assess the quality and timing of asset conversions to gauge the true financial robustness of the company.

Ethically, reclassifying long-term investments as short-term assets poses challenges. It raises questions about transparency, honesty, and the intent behind such classifications. If a company reclassifies investments solely to inflate its current ratio artificially, it could be accused of misleading investors or creating a false perception of liquidity strength. Ethical financial reporting requires that classifications genuinely reflect the company's circumstances and that management discloses any significant reclassifications and their reasons transparently.

However, there are circumstances where reclassification makes practical and financial sense. For example, if a company holds a long-term investment in marketable securities that are approaching maturity or could be sold quickly due to favorable market conditions, reclassifying such investments as short-term assets can provide a more accurate picture of immediate liquidity. This reclassification can aid in better cash flow management and strategic planning, especially when the company anticipates converting these assets into cash within the short term.

In conclusion, while reclassification of investments can influence key financial ratios, it must be approached with ethical considerations and transparency. Stakeholders should evaluate financial statements comprehensively, understanding the context behind asset classifications to make informed decisions. Reclassification is justifiable within certain operational realities but should not be used as a means to mislead or artificially enhance a company's apparent liquidity position.

References

• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Gibson, C. H. (2017). Financial Reporting & Analysis. South-Western Cengage Learning.
• Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2012). Financial Statement Analysis & Valuation: A Strategic Perspective. Cengage Learning.
• Jeter, D. C. (2018). Financial Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Skinner, D. J. (2016). Financial Statement Fraud: Strategies for Prevention. John Wiley & Sons.
• Zwieg, K. J. (2014). Financial Accounting for Managers. John Wiley & Sons.
• American Institute of CPAs. (2017). Financial Reporting Framework. AICPA.
• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). (2020). IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements.
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2018). Regulation S-X: Financial Statements.
• White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. John Wiley & Sons.