Assignment Directions Read Over Each Of The Following 192489

Assignment Directionsread Over Each Of The Following Directions The

Read over each of the following directions, the required Reading Research Literature worksheet, and grading rubric. Download and complete the required Reading Research Literature (RRL) worksheet. Access the specified article: O’Connor, M., Tanner, P., Miller, L., Watts, K., & Musiello, T. (2017). Detecting distress: Introducing routine screening in a gynecological cancer setting. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 21(1), 79-85. Retrieve it from the provided link. The article must be used in the worksheet. Ensure that the worksheet is completed using Microsoft Office Word 2013 or later for Windows, or Office 2011 or later for Mac. Save the file in ".docx" format; do not save as WordPad. You may use Office 365, available free for Chamberlain students via the student portal. Use correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and APA in-text citations. Submit the completed worksheet as part of the Week 6 assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of routine distress screening within gynecological oncology care represents a significant advancement in patient-centered approaches to cancer treatment. The article by O’Connor, Tanner, Miller, Watts, and Musiello (2017) provides valuable insights into implementing systematic psychological distress assessments to enhance clinical outcomes and patient quality of life in this specialized setting.

The importance of addressing psychological distress in cancer patients has long been recognized by healthcare professionals, as distress can profoundly affect treatment adherence, recovery, and overall well-being (Zabora et al., 2001). Traditionally, distress assessments occurred sporadically, often relying on patient-initiated disclosures or clinician intuition. The authors argue that routine screening ensures consistent identification of distress, facilitating timely interventions and potentially improving survivorship experiences.

O’Connor et al. (2017) describe a comprehensive process for implementing routine distress screening in a gynecological cancer setting, emphasizing staff training, selecting appropriate screening tools, and integrating assessments into standard care pathways. The study demonstrates that systematic screening not only detects high levels of emotional distress but also promotes a multidisciplinary approach to management, involving oncology nurses, social workers, and mental health professionals. This collaborative strategy aligns with contemporary models advocating for holistic patient care (Ussher et al., 2013).

Critical to the success of routine screening is staff engagement and education. O’Connor et al. (2017) highlight that ongoing training improved staff confidence in discussing emotional well-being and responding appropriately to identified distress. This aspect underscores that technology and protocols alone are insufficient; cultural and behavioral shifts among healthcare providers are essential for sustainability.

Moreover, the article discusses the use of validated tools, such as the Distress Thermometer, which offers quick, reliable assessments suitable for busy clinical environments (Jacobsen et al., 2005). The authors note that implementing such tools requires thoughtful integration into electronic health records and workflow adjustments to minimize disruption.

Evaluating outcomes, O’Connor et al. (2017) found increased identification of distressed patients and improved referrals to mental health services. These findings support the premise that routine screening can bridge gaps in mental health care within oncology settings. Nevertheless, challenges persist, including resource limitations, privacy concerns, and variability in staff training. Addressing these barriers is crucial for wider adoption.

In conclusion, the article emphasizes that routine distress screening in gynecological cancer care facilitates early identification and management of psychological issues, contributing to improved patient outcomes. Implementing such protocols necessitates comprehensive planning, staff engagement, and resource allocation. As healthcare models move toward holistic, patient-centered care, integrating routine distress assessments will likely become standard practice, benefiting patients and providers alike.

References

• Jacobsen, P. B., Donovan, K. A., Th looping, K., Azzarello, J., & Pirl, W. F. (2005). Screening for psychological distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(3), 626-637.
• Zabora, J., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., Curbow, B., Hooker, C., & Piantadosi, S. (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology, 10(1), 19-28.
• Ussher, J. M., Kirsten, L., Butow, P., & Zoellner, L. (2013). Supporting people with cancer: The importance of communication. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(2), 393-403.
• O’Connor, M., Tanner, P., Miller, L., Watts, K., & Musiello, T. (2017). Detecting distress: Introducing routine screening in a gynecological cancer setting. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 21(1), 79-85.