Assignment Executive Summary View Rubric Due Date: Jul 21, 2

Assignment Executive Summaryview Rubricdue Date: Jul 21, 20171600ma

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (850-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make a decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include: The purpose of the program or project. The target population or audience. The benefits of the program or project The cost or budget justification. The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated. Share your written proposal with your manager, supervisor or other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Request their feedback using the following questions as prompts: Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed? What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal? Submit the written proposal along with the "Executive Summary Feedback Form." Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. NRS451V. ExecutiveSummaryFeedbackForm_.doc

Paper For Above instruction

The importance of effectively securing funding for healthcare initiatives cannot be overstated, as these programs often serve as the backbone for improving patient outcomes, enhancing operational efficiency, and advancing organizational goals. An executive summary serves as a vital communication tool, succinctly presenting a comprehensive overview of a proposed program or project to decision-makers such as a hospital board or funding committee. This paper provides an example of an executive summary for a healthcare quality improvement initiative aimed at reducing hospital readmission rates through enhanced patient education and post-discharge follow-up care.

The primary purpose of the proposed program is to decrease 30-day hospital readmission rates for patients with chronic conditions such as heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes. These conditions are associated with high readmission rates, which not only compromise patient health but also impose substantial financial penalties on healthcare organizations under value-based reimbursement models. By focusing on these high-risk populations, the program aims to improve patient outcomes and reduce unnecessary hospital utilization.

The target population for this initiative includes adult patients discharged with chronic conditions from the hospital’s internal medicine and cardiology units. Special attention is given to vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and those with limited health literacy, who are more likely to experience complications and require readmission. Implementing tailored education strategies and coordinated follow-up care ensures that the program addresses the unique needs of these groups.

The potential benefits of this program are multifaceted. Primarily, it is expected to lead to significant reductions in readmission rates, which will improve patient health and satisfaction. Additionally, by decreasing readmissions, the hospital can avoid financial penalties and enhance its reputation for quality care. The initiative also fosters a culture of patient-centered care, promotes interdisciplinary collaboration, and contributes to the hospital’s strategic priorities focused on safety and quality improvement.

Cost analysis indicates that the program requires an initial investment in staff training, educational materials, and follow-up infrastructure. However, these costs are offset by the anticipated savings from reduced readmission rates, which are estimated to decrease the hospital’s penalties and re-admission-related expenses over the first year. A detailed budget justification includes personnel costs for case managers and patient educators, materials for patient education, and technology investments for tracking follow-up interventions.

Evaluation of the program’s effectiveness will be based on quantifiable metrics such as readmission rates within 30 days, patient satisfaction scores, and health outcomes related to the targeted chronic conditions. Data will be collected at baseline, quarterly during implementation, and after one year to assess progress and determine areas for improvement. Continuous quality improvement processes will be employed to refine the intervention strategies and ensure sustained benefits.

In conclusion, this executive summary presents a compelling case for funding an innovative program aimed at reducing hospital readmissions through targeted patient education and coordinated care. The program aligns with organizational priorities for improving quality and patient safety, offers a feasible budget plan with demonstrated cost-saving potential, and establishes clear metrics for success. With board approval, this initiative has the potential to positively impact patient outcomes, reduce organizational costs, and strengthen the hospital’s reputation as a leader in quality care.

References

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2020). Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPsABrief/
  • Fonarow, G. C., & Yancy, C. W. (2021). Strategies to Reduce Readmissions in Heart Failure. Circulation, 144(1), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.039154
  • Harrison, J. P., & Hart, G. (2019). Strategies for Enhancing Post-Discharge Follow-Up Care. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 39(4), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000177
  • Johnson, A., & Smith, R. (2018). Patient Education Interventions in Chronic Disease Management. Nursing Clinics of North America, 53(4), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2018.06.002
  • Krumholz, H. M., & Wang, N. (2020). Reducing Hospital Readmissions for Heart Failure: The Role of Patient Engagement. JAMA Cardiology, 5(8), 898–899. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2220
  • National Quality Forum (NQF). (2019). National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Post-Acute Care Transition. https://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/n/Transition_Care.aspx
  • Oberbach, K., & Vierhile, M. (2020). Cost-Effectiveness of Patient Education Programs. Health Economics Review, 10(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-020-00277-x
  • Smith, T., & Lee, S. (2022). Implementing Quality Improvement Initiatives in Healthcare Settings. Journal of Healthcare Management, 67(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM.000000000000184
  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Quality of Care: A Guide for Implementation. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240032698

Related Assignments