Assignment Instructions For Critical Analysis Essay Reflecti ✓ Solved

Assignment Instructions for Critical Analysis Essay Reflection

For this reflection assignment, you will make some choices about your approach to your critical analysis essay based on your understanding of revision and the feedback on your writing plan provided by your instructor. You’ll also discuss who your intended audience is and what you hope to accomplish with your essay.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Feedback and Revision Reflection

A. Think about your experiences with revision in the past. What approaches to revision have worked well for you?

B. What revision strategy from the Module Five content would you like to try when revising your critical analysis essay?

C. Review your writing plan and the feedback provided by your instructor. How does this feedback influence your ideas about your selected reading?

D. What changes will you make to your analysis now that you have received this outside feedback?

II. Audience

A. Imagine that your essay will be read by an audience beyond your instructor. Identify an audience that might benefit from reading your essay and describe some of this audience’s characteristics.

B. What potential challenges could you have connecting with this audience with your writing?

C. Identify some choices you can make within your writing to connect with this audience.

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Save your work in a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Then, check your writing for errors. Once you have proofread your document, submit it via the Summative Assessment Part One: Feedback and Revision Reflection link in Brightspace.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The process of revising and understanding one's audience are crucial components in composing an effective critical analysis essay. Reflecting on past revision experiences reveals that approaches such as peer editing, step-by-step editing, and reading aloud have consistently helped me identify errors and strengthen my arguments. These strategies allow for a more polished and cohesive final draft, as they facilitate a fresh perspective and help catch mistakes that might have been overlooked.

From the content in Module Five, I am particularly interested in trying the strategy of outlining my arguments before revising. This approach will enable me to organize my ideas clearly and ensure each point logically supports my thesis. Applying this method during revision will help me identify gaps in my reasoning and improve overall coherence in my essay.

My instructor’s feedback on my writing plan emphasizes the importance of a clear thesis statement and more detailed textual evidence to support my claims. This critique influences my ideas about the reading by prompting me to focus more sharply on specific themes and how they relate to my analysis. I realize that I need to refine my understanding of the themes and incorporate targeted quotations to strengthen my arguments.

Based on this feedback, I will revise my analysis by narrowing my focus to central themes rather than broad generalizations. I will also include more direct quotations from the text to substantiate my interpretations, ensuring my analysis is well-supported. These changes will enhance the clarity and persuasiveness of my essay.

Considering my intended audience, I imagine my readers to be fellow students, educators, or literary enthusiasts interested in the nuanced themes of the reading. This audience is characterized by their curiosity and desire for thoughtful interpretation. However, connecting with such an audience may pose challenges in balancing technical language with accessibility. If I use overly complex vocabulary or dense academic jargon, I risk alienating readers who may not be as familiar with literary analysis.

To address these challenges, I will make deliberate choices such as defining key terms, providing context for quotations, and using clear, straightforward language. These strategies will help make my analysis more engaging and accessible, fostering a better connection with my audience. Overall, understanding the audience’s background and expectations guides my revision process to produce a compelling and inclusive critical analysis essay.

References

• Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging Ideas: The Professor's Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. Jossey-Bass.
• Harris, R. (2009). Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts. Oxford University Press.
• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2017). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. W. W. Norton.
• Lunsford, A. A. (2014). The Everyday Writer (4th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
• Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
• Becker, H. S. (2007). Writing for Social Scientists: How to Start and Finish Your Thesis, Book, or Article. University of Chicago Press.
• Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with Power: Techniques for Mastering the Writing Process. Oxford University Press.
• Severino, C. (2017). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Routledge.
• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They Say / I Say with Readings. W. W. Norton.
• Murray, R. (2013). Writing to Learn. Routledge.