Assume You Work In Human Resources As Part Of Management

Assume You Work In Human Resources As A Part of the Management Team Fo

Assume you work in Human Resources as a part of the management team for AAA Transportation in Waukegan, WI, which has recently been acquired. AAA Transportation is an interstate trucking company that specializes in transporting wholesale produce in refrigerated trailers throughout the Midwest. The new owners want to make some sweeping changes in the services offered. One of the things that they would like to do is add delivery of nonperishable products, such as canned foods, to their delivery routes, allowing AAA to expand the area they cover and to provide expanded service to their existing customers. They think that, because many of the routes do not require a full load on the trucks, there is room to add the nonperishable goods and provide delivery at a lower rate than the customers are now paying.

Two of your coworkers, Vernon and Bud, are resistant to the changes proposed by the new owners. Vernon supervises the company’s drivers and Bud works in the corporate offices. Vernon does not think that it is a good idea to expand out of their core business, while Bud thinks that AAA is not strong enough to compete with existing companies that service the nonperishable foods market (several of whom AAA has had a long history of mutually respecting each others’ customers and routes); they risk alienating long-term customers; and transporting nonperishable goods in refrigerated trailers is inefficient. Both employees have been with the company for more than 20 years and have much influence among the rest of the employees.

Management does not want to terminate such long-term and influential employees but need for Vernon and Bud to join the effort to make the company successful. Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you define and discuss mental model/mindsets and their impact on you and your two coworkers. Identify the four steps to changing mental models/mind sets and how you could use them to bring Vernon and Bud onto the team. Identify the five forces that influence those mental model/mindsets of your coworkers and discuss how those forces might affect your coworkers’ mindsets. Include examples of what mental models/mindsets are possibly affecting Vernon and Bud’s decision-making processes and affecting their relationship with the company. Analyze your most commonly used mental models/mindsets that guide your decision making in the workplace. How do these models influence your decision making? Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

The dynamics of organizational change often hinge significantly on the mental models and mindsets of individuals within the organization. Mental models are deeply ingrained assumptions, generalizations, or images that influence how individuals interpret information, make decisions, and respond to change (Senge, 1990). These mental frameworks shape perceptions and behaviors, impacting both individual and collective responses to new initiatives. In the context of AAA Transportation’s proposed expansion into nonperishable goods delivery, understanding the mental models of Vernon and Bud—two long-standing employees resistant to change—is critical for effective change management and fostering team cohesion.

Vernon, who supervises drivers, holds a mental model heavily invested in the company’s existing core business of refrigerated produce transportation. His perception of the company's strengths is built around expertise, customer relationships, and operational routines aligned with perishable goods. He perceives expansion into nonperishable goods as an unwarranted disruption, fearing that it could dilute the company's focus and compromise service quality. This mental model leads Vernon to view the proposed change as risky and potentially detrimental, influencing his reluctance to support new initiatives.

Bud, working in the corporate offices, harbors a mental model influenced by a traditional view of market competition. He perceives AAA's strength primarily in its refrigerated produce niche and doubts the company's capacity to compete in the nonperishable market. His mental model includes fears of alienating long-term customers, existing competitors' dominance, and operational inefficiencies—believing that transporting nonperishable goods in refrigerated trailers is unnecessary and less efficient, which contributes to resistance. His mental framework thus shapes his skepticism toward the expansion plan and resistance to change.

The impact of these mental models extends beyond individual perceptions; they influence workplace relationships, decision-making, and organizational adaptability. Resistance from Vernon and Bud can hinder strategic growth and cultural cohesion if not effectively addressed. Recognizing this, managers can apply the four step process for changing mental models proposed by Mezirow (2000):

1. Identifying and articulating existing mental models: Understanding Vernon’s focus on core competencies and Bud’s market skepticism clarifies their perspectives.
2. Engaging in critical reflection: Encouraging Vernon and Bud to reflect on the origins and consequences of their beliefs fosters awareness of their mental models.
3. Exploring alternative perspectives: Facilitating exposure to data, case studies, or experiences demonstrating successful diversification and expansion shifts perceptions.
4. Practicing and reinforcing new mental models: Implementing pilot projects and providing positive feedback can help solidify revised viewpoints, fostering openness to change.

Beyond individual cognition, various external forces influence mental models. Five prominent forces include:

1. Organizational culture: The company’s historical focus on refrigerated produce shapes expectations and routines, reinforcing existing mental models resistant to change.
2. Leadership messages: The tone set by management—whether it emphasizes innovation or stability—directly impacts employee openness to change.
3. Peer influence: Input from colleagues and the informal leadership they follow can reinforce resistance or acceptance.
4. Market conditions: Competitive pressures and industry trends influence perceptions about the feasibility and necessity of diversification.
5. Personal experience: Long-term employees like Vernon and Bud draw heavily on their extensive history with the company, shaping their skepticism based on past successes and failures.

For Vernon and Bud, these forces reinforce their mental models: Vernon’s loyalty to core operations, shaped by his long tenure and familiarity, and Bud’s conservative approach to market competition grounded in traditional assessments. Their resistance is not merely personal but rooted in these compelling contextual forces, which can deepen their hesitation unless consciously addressed.

Analyzing my own mental models reveals that I tend to operate under a decision-making framework centered around evidence-based thinking and collaborative dialogue. I value data-driven insights and consider multiple perspectives, which influence my approach to change management. I believe that fostering an environment where employees are encouraged to question assumptions and explore alternatives can lead to more adaptive decision-making and resilience within the organization (Argyris & Schön, 1978). These mental models guide me to prioritize open communication, continuous learning, and constructive feedback, which are essential for navigating organizational change successfully.

In conclusion, change within organizations is significantly affected by the mental models of its members. Understanding and thoughtfully influencing these mental frameworks—through identification, critical reflection, exploration of alternatives, and reinforcement—are vital for successful change initiatives. Additionally, recognizing the external forces shaping these mental models allows leaders to craft more targeted strategies for engagement and transformation. By applying these principles, managers can foster a culture receptive to change, leverage the experience of long-term employees, and ensure organizational growth aligned with strategic goals.

References

• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley.
• Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–33). Jossey-Bass.
• Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.
• McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
• Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Harvard Business Press.
• Heifetz, R., & Laurie, D. L. (1997). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 124–134.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.