At The End Of Each Unit, DB Participation Is Assessed 523703

At The End Of Each Unit Db Participation Is Assessed Based On Level O

At the end of each unit, DB participation is assessed based on level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion. DBs allow learners to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB are accepted after the end of the unit. Learners must demonstrate an appropriate depth of understanding of course content to receive credit for having submitted substantive posts. Typically, this is achieved with 4–5 strong paragraphs for Main Posts and 2–3 strong paragraphs for Response Posts.

Part 1 Obtain and examine the International Society for Technology in Education and Standards for Teachers and Standards for Students ( ISTE Web site ) completing the following: Select 1 curricular area such as language arts, mathematics, science, or humanities Design an educational evaluation plan for a school district, college, or corporate site that includes the ISTE Standards for students as its outcomes. What are the pros and cons of using data from the following stakeholders to demonstrate that standards have been met? Teachers Education support employees Students Parents Administrators Business and community leaders

Part 2 Answer the following questions: What are the advantages and disadvantages of applying e-learning technology to K–12 curriculum? What potential obstacles or advantages can you see to application of technology standards to adult education and higher education? What cautionary guidelines would you recommend to educators as they attempt to integrate the ISTE Standards for Teacher standards into a curriculum and into an organization? Use the full-text databases in the AIU Library and other peer-reviewed resources for your research. Be sure to reference all sources using APA style. For more information on APA, please visit the APA Lab.

In your own words, post a substantive response to the Discussion Board question(s) and comment on other postings. Your response should address the DB question(s) and move the conversation forward. You will be graded on the quality of your postings, including mastery of the concept as well as critical thinking. If asked for your opinion, do not simply state that it is a good or bad idea; elaborate on your reasons and argument. Include enough detail to substantiate your thinking as well as your position on the questions or comments.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) Standards into educational evaluation plans requires a comprehensive understanding of technological pedagogical practices and stakeholder engagement. This paper explores the development of an evaluation framework based on ISTE Standards, analyzes stakeholder data utilization, assesses the application of e-learning in K–12 contexts, and considers broader implications for adult and higher education. Additionally, it offers cautions and recommendations for educators aiming to incorporate ISTE Standards into organizational practices.

Designing an Educational Evaluation Plan with ISTE Standards

The foundation of an effective educational evaluation plan is aligning technological competencies with curriculum-specific outcomes. Selecting a curricular area such as science allows for an evaluation that emphasizes inquiry, digital collaboration, and data analysis. The evaluation plan should include specific objectives linked to the ISTE Standards for Students, such as being an empowered learner, digital citizen, knowledge constructor, innovative designer, computational thinker, and creative communicator. These outcomes guide assessments and instructional strategies aimed at fostering 21st-century skills.

Stakeholder Data: Pros and Cons

Using stakeholder data offers diverse perspectives on meeting ISTE Standards, but each source has advantages and limitations. Teachers provide immediate feedback on student engagement and skill acquisition, making them valuable for formative assessment. However, their subjective perspectives might lack objectivity or overlook broader organizational goals. Education support employees can offer insights into infrastructure and resource adequacy. Students provide direct evidence of their development, yet their self-assessment may be biased or inconsistent. Parents and community leaders contribute external viewpoints reflecting societal needs, but they might lack detailed insight into classroom activities or individual student progress. Administrators can evaluate program alignment with institutional objectives but might focus more on compliance than on pedagogical quality. Business leaders can influence digital literacy standards relevant to workforce demands but may prioritize technical skills over ethical use or critical thinking.

Advantages and Disadvantages of E-learning in K–12 Curriculum

E-learning technology transforms traditional K–12 education by offering flexible, personalized, and accessible learning experiences. Advantages include increased engagement through interactive multimedia, tailored pacing to meet individual student needs, and expanded access to resources beyond physical classrooms. E-learning can also facilitate differentiated instruction, real-time assessment, and collaboration across geographic boundaries. Conversely, disadvantages encompass digital equity concerns, where disparities in access to devices and high-speed internet can exacerbate educational inequalities. Technical issues, lack of social interaction, and reduced teacher-student engagement are additional barriers that may hinder effective implementation.

Technology Standards in Adult and Higher Education

Applying technology standards to adult and higher education introduces both opportunities and challenges. Advantages involve preparing learners for the digital economy, fostering independent learning, and increasing access to advanced coursework through online platforms. Obstacles include resistance to change among faculty or institutions, digital literacy gaps among learners, and the need for substantial infrastructure investment. Furthermore, adult learners often juggle multiple responsibilities, making flexible, self-directed online learning essential. Implementing standards must consider contextual differences, with clear policies to ensure quality and relevance of digital tools that enhance learning outcomes.

Guidelines for Integrating ISTE Standards

For educators integrating ISTE Standards, it is vital to adopt a systematic approach grounded in professional development, curriculum alignment, and organizational culture change. Caution should be exercised to avoid superficial adoption; instead, standards should inform instructional design and assessment practices. Ongoing training and collaborative planning are essential for meaningful implementation. Additionally, digital safety, data privacy, and ethical use should be prioritized to foster responsible technology use. Establishing clear metrics for evaluating progress toward standards ensures continuous improvement. Finally, fostering a community of practice allows educators to share successes, challenges, and innovative solutions, reinforcing the sustainable integration of ISTE Standards.

Conclusion

Integrating ISTE Standards into educational assessment and curriculum development holds promise for preparing students for a digital future. While stakeholder data offers valuable insights, educators must navigate potential biases and limitations. Applying e-learning strategies to K–12, as well as extending standards to higher education, requires careful planning, resource allocation, and ongoing evaluation. By adhering to thoughtful implementation guidelines, educators can harness technology’s potential to enrich learning experiences and develop critical skills necessary for success in the 21st century.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2016). ISTE Standards for Students. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). ISTE Standards for Educators. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). The NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. The New Media Consortium.
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
• Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance Education: A systems view of online learning. Wadsworth Publishing.
• Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Valentine, G., & Holloway, S. (2017). Children’s geographies and the problem of representation. Progress in Human Geography, 41(1), 1–20.
• Peng, Z. (2017). Digital literacy and adult learner success. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 13-24.
• Zhao, Y. (2003). What teachers should know about technology: Focus on adolescent literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(4), 294-304.