Respond To Peers: Respond To Two Classmates In Each Response
Respond To Peers Respond To Two Classmates In Each Responsenote Any
Respond to two classmates. In each response, note any similarities and differences in your description of the genre types (e.g., persuasive, expository, personal) and your peer’s description of those genres. Answer your classmates’ questions to the best of your knowledge. Response posts must be 125 to 200 words in length and posted by Day 7. If you have questions about how to participate in discussions, consult “About Discussions” under the Course Home menu. You are not required to support your claims with additional scholarly sources; however, should you decide to use additional sources, make sure you properly cite any references. Refer to the Ashford Writing Center’s Citation and Reference Guide for guidelines on citing sources in APA style.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires students to respond to two classmates’ discussion posts about genre types such as persuasive, expository, and personal writing. Each response should compare and contrast the student’s own description of these genres with that of their peer, highlighting similarities and differences. Additionally, students should answer any questions posed by their classmates to the best of their ability. Each response must be between 125 and 200 words and must be posted by Day 7 of the discussion week.
This exercise aims to foster deeper understanding of genre distinctions and encourage meaningful engagement within the online academic community. By reflecting on peers’ perspectives and articulating comparative insights, students enhance their comprehension of genre conventions and develop critical thinking skills essential for effective academic and professional writing. While scholarly sources are not required, students should correctly cite any external references in APA format, demonstrating proper academic integrity and citation practices.
Effective responses are characterized by respectful, constructive, and insightful feedback. Comparing one's understanding with that of a peer can reveal different interpretative frameworks, cultural influences, or experiential insights related to genre conventions. Such discussions deepen awareness of genre diversity and promote an appreciation for varied rhetorical strategies. Adhering to the posting deadline ensures active participation and continuity within the course discussion forum, which is vital for a collaborative learning environment.
In summary, this assignment not only promotes understanding of writing genres but also emphasizes respectful academic dialogue, critical reflection, and proper citation practices. Engaging thoughtfully with peers’ posts allows students to refine their analytical skills and broadens their perspective on genre functions across different contexts and audiences.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They say / I say: The moves that matter in academic writing (4th ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.
Lunsford, A. A., & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2016). Everything's an argument (6th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
Reid, J. (2012). The process of academic writing. Canadian Scholars.
Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. University of Michigan Press.