Background, Authority, And Leadership Rising From The Ran
Back Groundcase Authority And Leadership Rising From The Ranksafter W
Back ground: Case Authority And Leadership Rising From The RanksAfter working eight years as staff nurse on general medical surgical unit, Julie Davis was appointed nurse manager of that unit. Following a staff meeting at which Davis promotion was announced. Julie found herself surrounded by three long time co-workers offering their congratulations and making other observations and comments I am really happy for you, “said Sarah Jackson. “This sounds like a terrific career step. But I suppose this means our carpool is affected, since your hours are bound to be a lot less predictable from now on.†Elaine Rowe said, “And I guess that shoots the lunch bunch, too.
Management commitments, you know,†The emphasis on management was subtle through undeniable, and Julie was not at all sure she was pleased with what she was hearing. Jane Davidson offered, “Well, maybe now we can get some action on a few age-old problems. Remember, Julie, you used to gripe about these things as much as the rest of us. We’ve all complained a lot, “Sarah agreed. “That’s been sort of a way of life around here.†The tone of her voice shaded toward a suggestion of coolness and her customary smile was absent when she added, “Now Julie’s going to be in a position where she can do something, so let’s hope she doesn’t forget who her friends are.†Elaine and Jane looked quickly from Sarah to Julie.
For an awkward 10 seconds or so, no one spoke. At last someone passing by said something to Julie and as Julie turned to respond, Elaine, Jane and Sarah went their separate ways. CITM 501 Spring/Summer 2014 Homework Assignment 5 Due Month #, 2014 @5 PM via Bb Refer to the models at the end of this document to answer the following questions. Solve model A adding answer and sensitivity analysis reports to your output. Answer the following questions based on the sensitivity analysis.
Do not reâ€resolve the model. Clearly indicate the part of the output each answer is based on. 1. If ABC found out that they underestimated their return on investment on the CRM offering, what would be the impact of this on their estimated profit, i.e. how much increase in the ROI from the current level of 0.4 would require you to reâ€solve the model and change your recommendation? 2.
If the ROI for Data warehousing services went up to 0.5, how much of an increase in profit would that imply? 3. If the VP thinks that he can increase the computer capacity by acquiring 10 more computers for $72,000 (total, i.e. for all computers) annually, should he go ahead and spend the money on these 10 computers? Why? (Note: this money would not be part of the existing operating budget) Solve model B adding answer and sensitivity analysis reports to your output. Answer the following questions based on the sensitivity analysis.
Do not reâ€resolve the model. Clearly indicate the part of the output each answer is based on. 4. If the profit requirement was reduced by 10% (from $500,000), how much of their spending can they decrease? 5.
If they now decided that $500,000 is low for profit, how much should they increase their spending to make 5% more profit (than $500,000)? Submit one spreadsheet file (with 7 tabs: the model, the answer report, and the sensitivity report for each part, and your analysis) beginning with your first initial ending with #5 as the file name (i.e.
Paper For Above instruction
Leadership and authority within organizations often emerge from individuals who have risen through the ranks, demonstrating experience, dedication, and an understanding of organizational dynamics. The case of Julie Davis exemplifies this phenomenon, highlighting how internal advancement fosters effective leadership rooted in familiarity with operational realities. This paper explores the advantages and challenges associated with rising from the ranks to attain leadership roles, emphasizing the impact on organizational culture, employee morale, and decision-making processes.
Introduction
Promoting from within is a common strategy organizations employ to develop leadership and retain institutional knowledge. Julie Davis’s promotion from staff nurse to nurse manager after eight years underscores the organization's recognition of her expertise and institutional loyalty. Such internal promotions often lead to leadership that is both credible and respected, as they are familiar with the day-to-day operations and challenges faced by their teams.
The Advantages of Rising from the Ranks
Leaders who ascend through organizational hierarchies tend to possess a nuanced understanding of operational processes, staff dynamics, and organizational culture. This experiential knowledge enables them to make informed decisions, foster employee trust, and implement policies effectively. For instance, Davis's intimate knowledge of her unit's workflows and patient care practices positions her to lead improvements that are realistic and impactful.
Furthermore, internal promotion can boost employee morale and motivation. When staff observe career advancement opportunities, they feel valued and are encouraged to develop their skills, leading to a more committed and engaged workforce. Davis's promotion likely served as an inspiration for her colleagues, illustrating that dedication can lead to upward mobility.
Challenges Faced by Internal Leaders
Despite these benefits, rising from the ranks can pose significant challenges. One such issue is balancing the dual roles of peer and supervisor, which can strain interpersonal relationships and lead to perceived favoritism. Davis's colleagues’ comments during the staff meeting reflect underlying tensions about her new role and its impact on existing social bonds.
Additionally, internal leaders may face difficulties in implementing change if they are perceived as 'insiders' or if they lack external perspectives. Resistance from staff accustomed to previous practices can impede progress, necessitating strong communication and change management skills.
Impact on Organizational Culture
When leaders are promoted from within, organizational culture often becomes more cohesive. Leaders who understand and embody shared values reinforce cultural norms and foster a sense of stability and continuity. In Davis's case, her familiarity with the unit's culture can help in navigating change and rallying staff around common goals.
However, if internal promotion is perceived as favoritism or if it leads to limited diversity of thought, it can also contribute to stagnation and complacency. Organizations must balance internal promotion with fresh perspectives to sustain innovation.
Conclusion
Rising from the ranks is a powerful pathway to leadership that offers numerous benefits, including operational expertise and enhanced morale. However, it demands careful management of interpersonal dynamics and openness to external insights. Organizations like the one in the case example can leverage these internal leaders to foster a strong, cohesive culture that promotes growth, stability, and effective decision-making. Julie Davis’s experience exemplifies the potential of internal promotion, illustrating how leaders from within can positively influence organizational success when supported by strategic development and change management efforts.
References
- Bass, B. M. (1990). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.
- Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
- Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
- Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
- Luthans, F. (2002). Real Managers. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. Sage publications.
- Rast, F. M. (1988). Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes. McGraw-Hill.
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
- Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education.
- Goleman, D. (1998). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 76(2), 78-90.