Background Student Theresa Age 10 Grade 4 Scenario Rare

Backgroundstudent Theresaage 10grade 4thscenariotheresa Rarely Fini

Theresa rarely finishes her classwork. How could she? She’s up, she’s down, she’s wandering all around. Her teacher, Ms. Lowe, seems always to be asking her to return to her desk and begin working.

Theresa almost never has her book or her pencil out, and during class transitions, she is the last to be ready. Ms. Lowe believes that Theresa’s out-of-seat behavior and procrastination are contributing to her poor grades. She needs to assess the situation and determine which of these behaviors is the most problematic. Possible strategies include duration recording, interval recording, and latency recording.

Read the attached Star Sheet Overview and the Star Sheets for the three strategies listed above.

Paper For Above instruction

The behaviors exhibited by Theresa—frequent wandering around, delayed readiness during class transitions, and poor task completion—are common challenges faced by educators and require precise measurement strategies to analyze effectively. To understand and modify these behaviors, behavior analysts often employ various observational recording methods such as duration recording, interval recording, and latency recording. Each of these strategies offers unique insights but also has limitations depending on the specific behavior being measured.

Definition of Each Strategy

Duration recording involves measuring the amount of time a behavior occurs during a specified observation period. For example, it would record how long Theresa spends out of her seat or wandering during a class session. This strategy is useful for behaviors that have a clear beginning and end, allowing for a quantitative assessment of how much time the behavior consumes.

Interval recording divides the observation period into equal intervals (e.g., 10 seconds or 1 minute), and the observer records whether the behavior occurs at any point during each interval. This method helps estimate the frequency and pattern of behavior over time, especially for behaviors that are brief, variable, or occur at irregular intervals.

Latency recording measures the amount of time from a specific cue or instruction until the onset of a behavior. For instance, it could assess how long Theresa takes to return to her desk after being asked or how long it takes for her to start her classwork after receiving instructions. This method provides insight into the promptness or delay in response behavior.

Appropriateness of Measuring Theresa’s Out-of-Seat Behavior

Duration recording is appropriate for Theresa’s out-of-seat behavior because it can quantify how much time she spends away from her desk, offering a clear measure of the extent of the behavior. It helps identify patterns, such as whether she tends to wander more during certain parts of the lesson.

Interval recording can also be suitable, especially if her out-of-seat behavior occurs intermittently. It allows the teacher to determine how frequently the behavior occurs within each interval, giving a broader picture of her activity levels and movement patterns throughout the session.

Latency recording, however, is less appropriate for measuring out-of-seat behavior because it does not account for the total duration or frequency but only measures the delay after a specific cue. While useful in some contexts, it might not fully capture the overall extent of her wandering behavior.

Appropriateness of Measuring Theresa’s Procrastinating Behavior

Latency recording is ideal for measuring Theresa’s procrastination related to completing her classwork. For example, observing how long it takes her after a task is assigned to begin working provides valuable data on her response to task initiation prompts.

Interval recording could be useful if her procrastination manifests as intermittent delays, such as frequently hesitating or pausing before starting or continuing her work during class periods. It would record whether she is engaged or procrastinating in each interval.

Duration recording might be less suitable here unless the focus is on measuring the total time she spends procrastinating once she begins her work. However, as a primary focus, latency or interval recording typically provides clearer insights into procrastinating behavior than duration recording.

Conclusion

In summary, selecting the appropriate measurement strategy depends on the specific behavior of concern. Duration recording effectively measures how long Theresa is out of her seat, providing a straightforward assessment of her wandering tendencies. Interval recording offers a systematic method for capturing the frequency and pattern of her out-of-seat behavior and procrastination across time, especially for behaviors that occur irregularly. Latency recording allows for precise measurement of the delay in initiating desired behaviors, making it highly suitable for addressing Theresa’s procrastination. Using these strategies in combination can give Ms. Lowe comprehensive data to develop targeted interventions aimed at improving Theresa’s classroom engagement and academic performance.

References

• Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied Behavior Analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Iwata, B. A., et al. (2013). Behavior Analysis and Learning. Pearson.
• Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some Current Dimensions of Applied Behavior Analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.
• Kazdin, A. E. (2017). Research Design in Clinical Psychology. Pearson.
• DeLeon, I. G. (2014). An Introduction to Single-Subject Experimental Design. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 7(2), 143–152.
• Matson, J. L., & Dorsey, M. F. (2013). Assessing and Changing Problem Behaviors: A Guide for Educators and Clinicians. Psychology in the Schools, 50(10), 931–941.
• Hayes, S. C., & Sanford, B. (2014). Behavior Analysis & Modification in Clinical Practice. Routledge.
• West, E. L., et al. (2014). Using Behavioral Strategies to Improve Academic Engagement. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 123–136.
• Carr, E. G., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2014). Conceptual Foundations: Establishing Functional Relations between Behavior and Environment. Behavioral Interventions, 29(4), 290–301.
• Parker, R., & McComas, J. (2017). Measurement Strategies for Classroom Behavior. School Psychology International, 38(3), 245–261.