Based On The Background Research And Analytical Procedures

Based On The Background Research And Analytical Procedures Performed I

Based on the background research and analytical procedures performed in Stages a-c, summarize your observations about the company’s business, including your assessment of the client’s business risk. Prepare a broad audit plan: a. Which transaction cycles are the high-risk areas? b. Identify at least three risk areas in the audit of this company and describe: (1) the risk; (2) why you have assessed this as a specific risk; and (3) how you would perform the audit to address this risk. c. If management faced tremendous pressure regarding the entity’s financial performance, what opportunities might exist for them to engage in fraudulent financial reporting?

Paper For Above instruction

The evaluation of a company's business environment, based on background research and analytical procedures, is crucial to understanding its overall risks and designing an effective audit plan. In this context, the company's operational cycles, risk areas, and potential vulnerabilities to fraudulent reporting require careful consideration. This paper will synthesize observations from preliminary research, identify high-risk transaction cycles, and outline specific risk areas and audit responses. Additionally, it will explore how management pressure can lead to fraud opportunities, emphasizing the importance of professional skepticism and targeted testing.

Initial background research reveals that this company's primary business activities revolve around manufacturing and distribution. The industry is characterized by rapid technological changes, competitive pressures, and significant regulatory compliance requirements. These factors contribute to inherent business risks, such as inventory obsolescence, revenue recognition issues, and cost management challenges. The analytical procedures performed in stages a-c indicated fluctuating profit margins, inconsistent cash flows, and aging receivables, further suggesting areas vulnerable to misstatement or fraudulent activity.

High-Risk Transaction Cycles

In conducting an audit, certain transaction cycles are inherently more susceptible to error or manipulation. Notably, the revenue cycle, inventory cycle, and procurement cycle emerge as high-risk areas. The revenue cycle often bears the greatest risk, given the temptation to recognize revenue prematurely or inflate sales figures to meet targets. The inventory cycle poses risks of overstatement through misstatement of inventory valuation or concealment of obsolescence. The procurement cycle involves risks related to abuse of vendor relationships, kickbacks, or fictitious expenses.

Risk Areas and Audit Strategies

1. Revenue Recognition Risks

a. The risk: Premature or fictitious revenue recognition that inflates income.

b. Why assessed: Fluctuating profit margins, aggressive sales targets, and incentive structures increase temptation for revenue manipulation.

c. Audit approach: Implement substantive testing of sales transactions near period-end, confirm selected receivables, review revenue cutoff procedures, and analyze unusual sales patterns or discounts. Using analytical procedures like gross margin analysis and comparing sales trends with industry benchmarks can identify anomalies.

2. Inventory Valuation Risks

a. The risk: Overstatement of inventory values, obsolescence concealment, or incorrect costing methods.

b. Why assessed: The industry’s fast pace and technological changes suggest risk of obsolete stock, along with potential misstatement to improve balance sheets.

c. Audit approach: Perform physical inventory counts, reconcile inventory listings with ledger balances, test the accuracy of costing methods, and assess the obsolescence reserves. Analytical review of inventory turnover ratios and gross profit margins can detect inconsistencies.

3. Procurement and Expense Cycle Risks

a. The risk: Fictitious vendors, inflated purchase costs, or misclassified expenses intended to manipulate financial results.

b. Why assessed: Complex vendor arrangements and pressure to show reductions in costs may prompt management to manipulate procurement records.

c. Audit approach: Examine vendor master files for unusual entries, perform detailed testing of large or unusual transactions, and review approvals for procurement activities. Confirm vendor existence and analyze patterns in purchase frequency and amounts for abnormalities.

Fraud Opportunities Under Management Pressure

When management faces significant pressure to meet financial targets—due to investor expectations, debt covenants, or operational challenges—it might be tempted to engage in fraudulent financial reporting. Such opportunities include recognizing fictitious revenues, accelerating income recognition, manipulating inventory valuations, or deferring expenses. The pressure to achieve desired results can foster an environment where unethical behaviors manifest through manipulation of accounting records or estimates.

Management may be tempted to capitalize expenses improperly or delay recognizing liabilities to meet earnings targets. Additionally, pressure to maintain share prices can incentivize management to embellish income figures through aggressive revenue recognition policies or manipulative journal entries. The oversight of internal controls becomes especially critical in such scenarios to detect and prevent fraudulent activities.

Conclusion

An initial review of the company's background underscores the importance of focusing on revenue, inventory, and procurement cycles during the audit. Recognizing these as high-risk areas, auditors should employ targeted substantive procedures and analytical reviews. Furthermore, understanding the pressures faced by management highlights the need for heightened professional skepticism and rigorous internal control assessments. Effective audit planning aligned with these insights can mitigate the risks of material misstatements and fraudulent financial reporting, ultimately contributing to a fair presentation of the company's financial position.

References

• Crane, T. (2013). Auditing and Assurance Services. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Holzer, P. (2017). Auditing: A Practical Approach. Cengage Learning.
• ICAEW. (2018). Fraud Risks and Controls. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
• Louwers, T., Ramani, K., Sinason, D. H., & Strawser, J. R. (2015). Auditing & Assurance Services. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ramos, E. (2019). Fraud Detection and Prevention in Financial Statements. Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 8(4), 45-59.
• SAS No. 99. (2002). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. American Institute of CPAs.
• Wu, J., & Roberts, C. (2018). Business risk and internal controls: An international perspective. International Journal of Auditing, 22(3), 301-317.
• Yin, R. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Zimmerman, J. (2017). Accounting for Fraud: An Overview. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 9(2), 245-253.
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2020). Revenue Recognition (ASC 606).