Below Are Two Unrelated Cases Involving Marketable Equity Se

Below Are Two Unrelated Cases Involving Marketable Equity Securities

Below are two unrelated cases involving marketable equity securities. Explain how the information provided affects the classification, carrying value, and income reported for that company's investment securities. The balance sheet of a company does not classify assets and liabilities as current and noncurrent. The portfolio of available-for-sale equity securities includes securities normally considered current that have a net cost in excess of market value of $2,000. The remainder of the portfolio has a net market value in excess of cost of $5,000.

A company's noncurrent portfolio of marketable equity securities consists of the common stock of one company. At the end of the prior year, the market value of the security was 50% of original cost, and this effect was properly reflected in a Valuation Adjustment account. However, at the end of the current year, the market value of the security had appreciated to twice the original cost. The security is still considered noncurrent at year-end.

Case 1: Equity Securities Valuation and Classification

In analyzing the first case, the classification, carrying value, and income recognition related to the company's marketable equity securities are influenced by changes in market value and the security's classification as noncurrent or current investments. Since this security is held as part of a noncurrent portfolio and is classified as noncurrent despite appreciations, it is accounted for under the cost basis and valuation adjustments. Upon initial recognition, purchased securities are recorded at cost, and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized through a Valuation Adjustment account. Significant appreciation to twice the original cost is a considerable increase, and because the security remains classified as noncurrent, these gains do not impact current income but rather the comprehensive income or accumulated other comprehensive income. When securities are designated as available-for-sale, fluctuations in fair value affect accumulated other comprehensive income until realized. The increasing market value, now double the original cost, enhances the valuation of the investment on the balance sheet; however, the income statement does not reflect this unrealized gain until sale occurs. The classification as noncurrent indicates the company's intent to hold until maturity or for indefinite periods, and thus, the valuation adjustments reflect the potential realizable gains rather than current income.

Case 2: IBM and ABC, Inc.: Investment and Equity Method Application

The second case involves IBM's acquisition of an 80% stake in ABC, Inc., which requires applying the equity method to account for this investment. Initially, IBM purchases the shares for $40 million when the fair value of ABC's net assets is $25 million, indicating an excess of $15 million. This excess is allocated to goodwill, which is not amortized due to its indefinite life. Over subsequent years, the investment account is adjusted based on IBM’s share of ABC’s net income or loss and dividends received. For 2013, the net income of $2 million increases the carrying amount of the investment by IBM’s share ($80% of $2 million = $1.6 million), while dividends decrease it ($1 million dividend results in a $800,000 reduction in the investment account). In 2014, ABC reports a net loss of $600,000; IBM’s percentage share results in a $480,000 reduction in the investment account, while dividends of $800,000 again decrease the investment value. As of December 31, 2014, the investment account is calculated as follows:

- Initial investment: $40 million

- Plus: Share of 2013 net income: $1.6 million

- Less: Share of 2013 dividends: $1 million

- Less: Share of 2014 net loss: $480,000

- Less: 2014 dividends: $800,000

This calculation results in an investment value of approximately $39.32 million at year-end 2014. The equity method captures the economic substance by reflecting the investment's share of profits, losses, and dividends, aligning the investor’s financial statements with the underlying economic realities. However, this approach may be less transparent for external users unfamiliar with the method, and it does not fully reflect the fair value of the investment, which could be a drawback in certain analysis contexts. It also assumes the investor has significant influence but not control, thus excluding consolidation. Overall, this method offers a balanced view of investment performance that demonstrates the economic substance of business relationships.

Discussion: Reflection of Business Activities in Financial Statements

The application of valuation adjustments, classification choices, and accounting methods significantly influences how a company’s financial position and performance are portrayed. In the first case, recognizing unrealized gains as part of other comprehensive income helps prevent distortion of earnings while still providing relevant information about the valuation of securities. Nonetheless, it may obscure the actual potential for profit realization, especially if securities are held for trading purposes. The balance sheet's presentation of securities as noncurrent assets, despite appreciation, aligns with the company’s intent and holding period but may understate the market value in rapidly appreciating markets. Conversely, the income statement remains unaffected until the securities are sold, which could result in delayed recognition of gains or losses.

In the second case, the equity method effectively captures the investor's share of the investee’s profitability and cash flows, providing a more dynamic view of the investment's contribution to earnings. This approach enhances the relevance of the financial statements but relies heavily on the accuracy of the investee’s reported net income. It also provides a more realistic representation of the investor’s economic interest and ongoing influence, unlike the cost or fair value methods. However, it might lack the transparency provided by recognizing fair value changes directly, which could be more useful under a mark-to-market accounting framework, especially for publicly traded securities. Overall, both approaches reflect different facets of economic reality, and their strengths and weaknesses should be carefully considered by users of financial statements.

References

• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Gibson, C. H. (2017). Financial Reporting & Analysis (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2012). Business Analysis & Valuation: Using Financial Statements (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2019). Intermediate Accounting (16th ed.). Wiley.
• FASB Accounting Standards Codification. (2023). ASC 320, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities.
• FASB. (2016). Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01 — Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.
• Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Needles, B. E., & Powers, M. (2018). Financial Statements: A User Perspective (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Revsine, L., Collins, D., Johnson, W., & Mittelstaedt, F. (2015). Financial Reporting & Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Schroeder, R. G., Clark, M. W., & Cathey, J. M. (2019). Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis (13th ed.). Wiley.