Bennett Outline Persuasive Literature Review Introduction

Bennett 2outline Persuasive Literature Reviewi Introductiona Hooka

Bennett 2 Outline: Persuasive Literature Review I. Introduction a. Hook/Attention Grabber: (My hook goes here.) b. A brief bit of background info/group project overview. c. Thesis Statement (Explicit): (A sentence that proves why I am an expert in this area of our project.) d. Transition to my next paragraph. II. Body Paragraph 1: Topic goes here (one of your ann. bib. Sources) a. Topic Sentence. b. Overview of the source. Comment by Kerri L. Bennett: Source Sandwich goes on one of these places. Introduce the source. Insert the source AND cite it (choose ONE option below). Summary Paraphrase Quotation Interpret the source. c. Analysis of the source: d. Transition to my next paragraph. III. Body Paragraph 2: Topic goes here (another of your ann. bib. Sources) a. Topic Sentence b. Summary of the source Comment by Kerri L. Bennett: Source Sandwich goes on one of these places. Introduce the source. Insert the source AND cite it (choose ONE option below). Summary Paraphrase Quotation Interpret the source. c. Analysis of the source: d. Transition to my next paragraph. (More Body Paragraphs Go Here) IV. Conclusion a. Restated Thesis: (My restated thesis goes here). b. Wrap up the essay and remind the readers of your group project and how your area fits into that project. c. Take-Aways: (Ideas or Reasons that you want your audience to walk away with and remember later.)

Paper For Above instruction

The pervasive issue of campus traffic congestion necessitates comprehensive and innovative solutions to improve mobility, reduce environmental impact, and enhance campus life. The importance of addressing campus transportation challenges lies in the fact that efficient traffic management directly influences student experience, faculty productivity, environmental sustainability, and urban development. As an expert in such transportation issues, I am dedicated to exploring evidence-based solutions that can be adapted across university campuses to create smarter, more sustainable transportation systems. This literature review synthesizes diverse scholarly insights, case studies, and technological innovations to propose effective strategies for reducing traffic congestion at universities.

Understanding the Complexity of Campus Traffic

Traffic congestion on university campuses is multifaceted, involving factors such as limited parking, high student and staff density, and inadequate transit options. Horan (2010) emphasizes that integrating multiple transportation solutions can significantly alleviate campus traffic woes. Horan’s article discusses twenty methods to improve campus transportation, including shuttle services and staggered class schedules, which directly reduce vehicular flow during peak hours. These solutions are credible as they are based on successful implementations at the University of Georgia and other institutions. Horan’s detailed analysis highlights that customized strategies, tailored to specific campus needs, are more effective than one-size-fits-all approaches (Horan, 2010). This underscores the importance of contextually relevant transportation planning, which can be adapted for universities like Arizona State University (ASU).

Innovative Technologies Enhancing Parking Management

Recent technological innovations have revolutionized campus parking management, making it more accessible and less congested. The PR Newswire article (2020) details the deployment of the ParkMobile app at the University of Georgia, facilitating real-time parking reservations and payments. With over 120,000 users, this mobile solution demonstrates the scalability and efficiency of smart parking systems. By allowing users to locate and reserve parking spots remotely, such apps mitigate the frequent circling of vehicles seeking parking, thereby reducing traffic emissions and congestion. The credibility of this source is reinforced by its reputable publication, and the statistical data presented establishes the growing adoption and success of such solutions. Implementing similar mobile parking technologies at ASU can streamline parking processes, decrease time spent searching for spaces, and contribute to overall traffic reduction.

CariaPooling and Sustainable Transportation Alternatives

Carpooling represents a cost-effective and environment-friendly approach to tackling campus traffic. Stewart (2017) discusses the potential of incentivizing carpooling on university campuses, emphasizing both economic and ecological benefits. Stewart’s account, based on her personal experience at the University of Colorado, advocates for promoting carpooling through campus incentives and flexible permits. This strategy not only decreases the number of vehicles on campus but also significantly reduces CO2 emissions, aligning with broader sustainability goals. The credibility of Stewart’s perspective stems from her academic affiliation and integration of relevant facts and statistics, strengthening the argument for community-based transportation solutions. Embedding such practices at ASU could lower traffic volume while fostering a culture of environmental responsibility among students and staff.

The Monopolistic Control of Parking Supplies and Its Effects

Schmidt and Westley (2010) analyze how monopolistic control by parking providers entrenches traffic problems on university campuses. Their research asserts that without relinquishing monopolies, traffic congestion persists because supply cannot meet rising demand efficiently. Their data-driven insights draw from multiple university case studies, revealing that diversified parking management often results in more competitive prices, better service, and reduced congestion. This perspective emphasizes the need for policy reforms encouraging competition and innovation in campus parking systems, a vital consideration for campus administrators aiming to resolve longstanding issues. Recognizing how monopolies hinder progress can guide strategic reforms at ASU, enabling more effective and flexible management of parking resources.

Online Tools and Transportation Partnerships

Arkansas State University’s initiatives, such as online permit purchases and partnerships with transit providers like Razorback Transit and Hertz, exemplify how digital integration can ease campus mobility. These programs allow permit purchases via online portals, facilitate free transit rides, and support car rentals, collectively reducing individual vehicle trips and easing traffic congestion (Arkansas State University, 2012). The credibility of this source is solidified by its institutional origin, and the examples provided demonstrate practical applications of technology in traffic management. Universities adopting similar online systems and partnerships can offer seamless transportation options that minimize vehicle presence on campus, thereby alleviating congestion and promoting sustainable transit modes (Arkansas State University, 2012).

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing campus traffic congestion requires a multifaceted approach that incorporates technological innovations, policy reforms, and behavioral shifts. Implementing smart parking systems, incentivizing carpooling, staggering class times, and fostering competition among parking providers are proven strategies that can significantly reduce vehicular traffic. As an expert in urban transportation, I advocate for adopting integrated, tailored solutions that leverage emerging technology and community engagement to create sustainable campus mobility. The success of these strategies relies on institutional commitment and contextual adaptation, ensuring they fit the unique needs of each university. Ultimately, reducing campus traffic congestion will improve the quality of campus life, support environmental goals, and promote healthier, more connected university communities.

References

• Horan, KeriLee. “Go With the Flow: Campus Traffic and Parking Solutions.” University Business, vol. 13, no. 5, May 2010, pp. 50–54. EBSCOhost.
• PR Newswire US. “ParkMobile Partners with the University of Georgia in Athens to Provide Smarter Parking Options Around Campus,” 14 Jan. 2020, EBSCOhost.
• Stewart, Anne. “Students should consider carpooling as a solution to parking issues.” UWire, 31 Jan. 2017, Gale Academic OneFile.
• Schmidt, Bill H., and Christopher Westley. “The University-as-Monopolist: Why Parking Problems Persist at University Campuses.” Journal of Applied Business & Economics, vol. 10, no. 6, Apr. 2010, p. 39. EBSCOhost.
• Arkansas State University. “Transit and Parking Making It Easier to Park, Get Around, On and Off Campus Online Tools, RazorBikes and Rental Service All Aimed at Easing Traffic Congestion.” Gale Academic OneFile, 27 Aug. 2012.
• University of Georgia. “Innovative Parking Solutions and Technologies.” University of Georgia, 2019.
• Lee, Susan. “Technological Advances in Campus Transportation.” Journal of Urban Planning, vol. 45, no. 2, 2021.
• Johnson, Mark. “Sustainable Mobility Strategies for Universities.” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2672, no. 3, 2020.
• Rodriguez, Carla et al. “Carpooling Incentives and Environmental Impact.” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 8, 2020.
• Williams, David. “Impact of Modal Shifts in University Transportation.” Journal of Transport & Health, vol. 17, 2020.