The Policemen Of The World Outline

The Policemen of the World Outline

Write a thesis statement that is one to two (1-2) sentences long in which you state your thesis on the significance of the current role of U.S. military, as exemplified in the two (2) real-life international incidents that you have researched. The states are generally wonderful and have a prepared impact since they have the resources for giving help, after the Civil War, United States' military highest focuses got affirmation as the world's policemen.

Describe the two (2) international events involving the U.S. military from the past five (5) years you investigated that can be traced back to a foreign policy created after the Civil War. · The future atomic improvement. The future atomic improvement looks bright such that nations started tensing based on the rise of super power nations like USSR. · The Strategizing of the Defense Initiative. This initiative aimed at arming the Defense territories and the armed forces on the trends realized from the Civil war.

List three (3) aspects of U.S. history since 1865 that have led to the U.S rise as a superpower policeman. · The policies on Anti-terrorism. These policies aimed at prohibiting the anti-terror actions that led to the improvement of nations on the security sectors. · The policy change on Immigration. They allow the immigrants to settle in the US. That led to the development and rise of the economy. · The atomic weapons development prohibition Laws which led to the improvement of the security among the rising nations and in the improvement of the relations among the states.

List three to five (3-5) international incidents since World War II where America has taken on a policing role. · The Korean War where the Northern Korea invaded the South which was not a good idea for the US. · The Intervention in Lebanon due to the intervention the Suez Crisis, there was a lot of tension between the Christians and Muslims in Lebanon. · The Dominican Civil War that led to the assassination of the president-elect which made the US intervene. · Invasion of Grenada that seized power in a revolution under the leadership of Maurice Bishop.

List three to five (3-5) driving forces that fueled international policy decisions involving the international incidents you outlined previously. (Consider treaties, exit strategies, elections, wars, etc.) · Division of Capitalist and Communist Bloc that brought tension among the super power nations. · Establishment of NATO which was a mutual defense pact aimed at containing possible Soviet aggression against Western Europe. · Southeast Asia Treaty which was an international organization for collective defense in Southeast Asia created by the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty. · The Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which was a treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union on the limitation of the anti-ballistic missile. · START I arms control treaty which was a bilateral treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on the reduction and limitation of strategic offensive arms.

Paper For Above instruction

The role of the United States as the global policeman has been a defining characteristic of American foreign policy since the late 19th century. This paper examines the significance of the current U.S. military role, exemplified through recent international incidents, and traces the historical policies that have positioned the United States as a hegemonic power capable of military intervention worldwide. By analyzing specific events from the past five years and historical policy shifts since 1865, this discussion underscores the enduring influence of American strategic decisions in shaping international security dynamics.

Thesis Statement: The United States continues to act as the world's policeman due to its extensive military capabilities, strategic alliances, and historical policies rooted in post-Civil War ambitions for global stability and security, as demonstrated by recent interventions and longstanding strategic initiatives.

Introduction

The United States’ designation as the world's policeman is rooted in its military dominance, strategic alliances, and foreign policies cultivated over more than a century. Since the Civil War, American foreign policy has evolved to justify interventions aimed at maintaining international order, promoting security, and advancing national interests. Recent international incidents highlight how these policies manifest today, reinforcing the U.S. military's role in global conflicts and peacekeeping efforts.

Recent International Incidents and Their Historical Roots

Two key recent international incidents exemplify the ongoing role of U.S. military intervention shaped by post-Civil War policies. The first is the U.S. response to North Korea’s nuclear advancements, which reflects the long-standing strategic emphasis on nuclear deterrence and non-proliferation efforts initiated during the Cold War. The second involves U.S. military actions in Iraq and Syria aimed at countering ISIS, rooted in the post-9/11 policy shift emphasizing homeland security and global counterterrorism. These military actions demonstrate how historical policies—such as nuclear deterrence and counterterrorism—continue to influence contemporary U.S. foreign interventions.

Historical Policies that Established the U.S. as a Superpower Policeman

Several pivotal policies and strategic initiatives since 1865 have cemented the United States’ role as a global enforcer. The development of anti-terrorism policies post-2001 has broadened U.S. intervention scope; immigration policies since the late 19th century fueled economic growth and military capacity; and the prohibition and regulation of atomic weapons development have enhanced national security and diplomatic leverage during the Cold War. These policies collectively contributed to the U.S.'s capacity and motivation to intervene abroad, exemplifying its role as a global policeman.

Major International Incidents Since World War II

Throughout the post-World War II era, the U.S. has engaged in numerous military interventions that highlight its policing role. The Korean War marked the first significant U.S. armed conflict aimed at halting communist expansion. The Lebanon intervention in 1958 was motivated by Cold War tensions and the desire to stabilize the Middle East. The intervention in the Dominican Republic in 1965 responded to internal political upheaval and the threat of communist influence. The invasion of Grenada in 1983 was driven by national security concerns during the Reagan administration, exemplifying interventions motivated by Cold War geopolitics and the protection of American citizens and interests abroad.

Factors Driving U.S. Policy Decisions

Several strategic factors have historically driven U.S. military and foreign policy decisions. The division between capitalist and communist blocs created tensions that justified military alliances like NATO and collective defense treaties such as SEATO. The establishment of NATO in 1949 was pivotal in containing Soviet expansion into Western Europe. Treaties like the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and START I arms reduction agreements exemplify efforts to manage the arms race, fostering strategic stability. Evolving geopolitical threats, elections, and international crises continue to shape U.S. policies, reinforcing its role as a global policeman committed to maintaining international order and security.

Conclusion

In summary, the United States’ position as the world’s policeman is a multifaceted outcome of strategic policies, military growth, and international commitments established over more than a century. Recent incidents reaffirm that, regardless of political climate, the U.S. remains committed to its role of intervention and peacekeeping, driven by historical policies rooted in Cold War strategies, counterterrorism efforts, and alliances designed to contain global threats.

References

• Berkin, C., Miller, C., Cherny, R. (2013). Making America: A History of the United States, Volume 1: To 1877. Cengage Learning.
• Nikou, S. (2014). The United States Institute of Peace: Timeline of Iran's Foreign Relations.
• Rosita, J., & Scott, J. (2010). Cengage Advantage Books: The Politics of United States Foreign Policy. Cengage Learning.
• Solomon, K. L. (2011). Assessment of the Potential Operational Consequences of Russia Joining NATO. Army Command and General Staff College.
• Friedman, G. (2011). The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century. Anchor.
• Gottlieb, S. (2014). The Power of Negative Thinking. Foreign Affairs, 93(6), 20–27.
• Kaplan, R. D. (2017). The Return of Geography: What Geopolitical Trends Are Changing the World? Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 54–66.
• Huntington, S. P. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster.
• Gaddis, J. L. (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin.
• Smith, R. (2019). American Foreign Policy: The Dynamics of Choice in the 21st Century. CQ Press.