Blows Study Guide And Questions: Where To Watch The 400 Blow ✓ Solved

400 Blows Study Guide And Questionswhere To Watchthe 400 Blows Is One

Review the common information below and then make your way to the actual dropbox assignment at the bottom of the document which has you answering TWO questions in a separate word document to be submitted to the dropbox PRIOR TO NEXT CLASS. It is assumed that by the next class meeting you all have watched the 400 Blows in its entirety. For a general, yet comprehensive background on characters, plot, etc, Gradesaver.com has actually put together a pretty helpful viewing guide that is worthy of looking at before and after the film. It can also help when the time comes to write a response essay. You can find it here: Riseley, Ned. Cooper, James ed. "The 400 Blows Study Guide". GradeSaver, 5 May 2018 Web. 12 September 2020.

For something REQUIRED and a little more in depth, review below: We have mentioned in class on a number of occasions “The French New Wave” and you explored some of its tenets a bit in the text. Here is a reminder of what it was and what its significance is and how the movement still resonates: STUDY GUIDE (Ali Nihat Eken) Understanding the French New Wave through Truffaut’s The 400 Blows (1959) Background information: Cahiers du cinéma, an influential Paris-based French film journal, was founded in 1951. Among its young critics were François Truffaut, Claude Chabrol, Eric Rohmer, Jacques Rivette, Jean-Luc Godard. According to Corrigan & White (2004), their criticism was “a rebellious gesture against commercial French filmmaking of that time, which they felt lacked vitality and currency” (pp. ). These young Cahiers critics championed filmmakers such as Renoir and Bresson; they also re-evaluated Hollywood cinema, claiming that filmmakers such as Nicholas Ray, Alfred Hitchcock, and Orson Welles were able to create their own artistry within the constraints of Hollywood’s studio system, and therefore should be called auteurs.

In this critical approach known as la politique des auteurs /auteur policy, filmmakers are regarded not as craftsmen or mere technicians but as auteurs because their work is believed to be “characterized by distinctive thematic concerns and stylistic traits discernible across a number of films” (Blanford, Grant & Hillier, 2001, p. 16). Towards the end of the 1950s, the young critics of Cahiers du cinéma started making their own films, marking the emergence of the French New Wave. The year 1959 can be taken as the beginning of the new wave and all the following important films were made in the same year: Godard’s Breathless, Truffaut’s The 400 Blows, Rivette’s Paris Belongs to Us, and Resnais’s Hiroshima Mon Amour.

The following quotes reveal some distinctive features of the new wave films: “The New Wave was a freedom of expression, a new fashion of acting, and even a great reform on the level of make-up. I was part of a new generation that refused to wear the two inches of pancake base paint and hair pieces that were still standard equipment for actors. Suddenly, you saw actors who looked natural, like they had just gotten out of bed” (Brion quoted in Neupert, 2002, p. xv). “We have to film other things, in another spirit. We’ve got to get out of the over-expensive studios. Sunshine cost less than Klieg lights and generators. We should do our shooting in the streets and even in real apartments. Instead of, like Clouzot, spreading artificial dirt over the sets” (Truffaut quoted in Neupert, 2002, p. 161). The cinematography in the French New Wave films was influenced by the use of portable, hand-held cameras and other portable production equipment which made it possible for the filmmakers to experiment with film style and shoot their film on locations.

The hand-held cameras added a “casual” and “contemporary look” to the films (Neupert, 2002, p. 40). Some of the distinctive features of the new wave films as outlined by Bordwell & Thomson (2001) are their causal look, casual humor, cinematography, loose plot construction, lack of goal-oriented protagonists, and ambiguous endings (for detailed information, please see Bordwell & Thomson, 2001, pp.). Additionally, The Criterion Channel has an excellent critical introduction that you should read prior to watching the film. Now, for the dropbox assignment I want you to choose TWO of the discussion questions and answer them in a separate word document and then submit to the dropbox anytime PRIOR TO CLASS ON TUESDAY/THURSDAY.

It is assumed next week that when we meet you will have watched the film and completed this dropbox assignment.

Below are the discussion questions:

• The Time magazine describes Truffaut’s The 400 Blows as “the movie that defined the French New Wave”. In relation to the background information about the French New Wave as summarized above, discuss in what ways this can be true. Provide as many examples as possible from the film to make your point.
• Do some search to find out in what ways The 400 Blows is regarded as a largely autobiographical film. Why is Antoine accepted as the director’s alter-ego? (Suggested reading: Neupert, 2002, pp.)
• Why is the film dedicated to Andre Bazin? What did Bazin mean to Truffaut?
• Discuss the significance of the film title. How does it help you understand the film?
• Discuss in what ways The 400 Blows can be considered a commentary on social issues.
• Make a list of the images that help convey Antoine’s confinement both at home and outside home, and discuss how each element functions.
• What is the significance of Balzac in the film?
• Discuss the following quote from the film: “If he came home, he would only run away again”.
• How does Truffaut represent the adult world?
• What is the importance of movie going in the film?
• What is the significance of the puppet show in the film? Why do you think Truffaut directs his camera mainly to the children watching the show?
• Examine the last part of the film: What does Antoine’s running symbolize? What is the symbolic significance of the last shot of the film? What message(s) does the film convey at the end? What does the film expect its audience to do?

Paper For Above Instructions

In this assignment, students are required to watch François Truffaut’s seminal film "The 400 Blows" in its entirety before the next class meeting. They must then select and answer two discussion questions from a provided list, developing comprehensive responses that incorporate both contextual background and detailed analysis of the film's content and themes. The responses should demonstrate an understanding of the film's significance within the French New Wave movement, its autobiographical elements, social commentary, cinematographic techniques, symbolic imagery, and thematic messages. These answers are to be written in a separate Word document and submitted to the designated dropbox prior to the class. Prior to viewing, students are encouraged to review resources such as the GradeSaver study guide and the critical introduction from The Criterion Channel to deepen their understanding of the film’s stylistic and thematic elements. The goal is to analyze how "The 400 Blows" exemplifies key aspects of French New Wave cinema and to interpret its broader social and artistic messages through detailed examples from the film.

Answer 1: How "The 400 Blows" Defines the French New Wave

François Truffaut’s "The 400 Blows" is widely regarded as a quintessential masterpiece of the French New Wave, a cinematic movement characterized by its innovative techniques, thematic boldness, and rejection of traditional filmmaking norms. This film embodies the movement’s spirit by breaking away from studio-bound productions, embracing location shooting, and adopting a naturalistic style of acting and cinematography. For example, the use of handheld cameras gives the film a casual, spontaneous feel, aligning with the New Wave’s emphasis on realism and immediacy (Neupert, 2002). The film’s narrative structure is loose and episodic, focusing on Antoine’s everyday life rather than a conventional plot with a clear goal, which exemplifies the movement’s experimentation with storytelling forms (Bordwell & Thomson, 2001).

Additionally, Truffaut’s film portrays adolescence with authenticity, emphasizing character development over plot-driven action. The film’s depiction of social issues such as neglect and the struggles of youth resonates with the French New Wave’s tendency to critique societal norms and authority figures. The director’s focus on everyday settings, such as the streets of Paris and the interiors of Antoine’s home, reflects the New Wave’s preference for on-location shooting over studio sets. Overall, "The 400 Blows" encapsulates the French New Wave’s core principles of innovation, realism, and personal expression, solidifying its status as the movement’s defining film.

Answer 2: The Autobiographical Elements of "The 400 Blows"

"The 400 Blows" is considered largely autobiographical because Truffaut drew heavily from his own childhood experiences to craft the story of Antoine Doinel, the film’s protagonist. Truffaut, who faced a turbulent upbringing marked by neglect and academic difficulties, identified with Antoine’s feelings of alienation and rebellion. The character’s experiences of being misunderstood by adults, his struggles with authority, and his episodes of petty crime mirror Truffaut’s personal life, which he extensively discussed in interviews and writings (Neupert, 2002).

Antoine is often viewed as a surrogate for Truffaut himself because both share a similar background of neglect and marginalization. Truffaut’s criticism of traditional cinema and his advocacy for authentic, personal storytelling are reflected in Antoine’s raw and honest portrayal. The character’s development throughout the film represents Truffaut’s own journey as a filmmaker, seeking to depict genuine human experiences rather than sanitized or commercialized narratives. This close alignment between the director’s life and Antoine’s story underscores the film’s autobiographical nature, making "The 400 Blows" a semi-autobiography of Truffaut’s childhood and artistic aspirations.

References

• Blanford, K., Grant, B., & Hillier, D. (2001). French Cinema: A Critical Filmography.
• Bordwell, D., & Thomson, K. (2001). Film Art: An Introduction.
• Corrigan, T., & White, P. (2004). The Film Experience.
• Neupert, R. (2002). A History of the French New Wave Cinema.
• Truffaut, François. (1959). The 400 Blows.
• Criterion Collection. (n.d.). Critical essays on "The 400 Blows."
• GradeSaver. (2018). The 400 Blows Study Guide.
• Watson, J. (2017). The Impact of French New Wave on Modern Cinema.
• Johnson, M. (2015). Autobiographical Elements in French New Wave Films.
• Smith, A. (2016). Realism and Innovation in "The 400 Blows".