Both Cases Are From Blanchard N. P. And Thacker J. 2013
Both Cases Are Fromblanchard N P Thacker J 2013 Effective T
Both cases are from: Blanchard, N. P. & Thacker, J. (2013). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practice. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson. This is the Domtar Case with questions at the end: Here is the Multistate Health Corp case and questions:
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires a comprehensive analysis of two case studies from the book "Effective Training: Systems, Strategies, and Practice" by Blanchard and Thacker (2013). The focus is on understanding the underlying training and development strategies employed in the cases of Domtar and Multistate Health Corporation. The paper should explore the context of each case, identify the challenges faced, and evaluate the training interventions implemented to address those challenges.
An effective paper begins with an introduction that briefly presents the importance of strategic training in organizational success. It then proceeds to analyze each case separately, discussing the background, specific issues, and training solutions. The analysis should include a critique of the approaches used, considering best practices from current literature. The conclusion should synthesize the lessons learned from both cases and discuss how these insights can be applied in wider organizational contexts. Supporting references should incorporate scholarly sources to substantiate evaluation points, emphasizing evidence-based practices.
The case on Domtar illustrates the company's approach to developing leadership capabilities through targeted training programs. It highlights how systematic needs assessments and tailored learning interventions can foster employee growth and organizational effectiveness. The Multistate Health case emphasizes the importance of aligning training initiatives with strategic organizational goals and addressing specific health communication challenges through innovative training strategies. A critical review should also consider possible limitations and alternative strategies that could enhance training outcomes.
The paper should be approximately 1000 words, with proper APA citations and references. The references should include at least five scholarly articles or authoritative sources that underpin the analysis and recommendations. The writing should be scholarly, clear, and structured, including an introduction, detailed case analysis, and conclusion.
References
1. Blanchard, N. P., & Thacker, J. (2013). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practice (5th ed.). Pearson.
2. Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee training and development. McGraw-Hill Education.
3. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101.
4. Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training approaches: A meta-analysis of design and implementation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234-245.
5. Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative review. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 263-296.
6. Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2001). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation. Wadsworth.
7. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (2012). Focus series: The science of training and development in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(S1), S1–S18.
8. McLagan, P. A. (1989). Models for HRD practice. Training & Development Journal, 43(4), 45-52.
9. Vaughan, R. D. (2014). Leadership development and training. Routledge.
10. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499.