Bruce Palmer Worked For Moss And McAdams For Six Years

Bruce Palmer Had Worked For Moss And Mcadams Mm For Six Years And W

Bruce Palmer had worked for Moss and McAdams (M&M) for six years and was just promoted to account manager. His first assignment was to lead an audit of Johnsonville Trucks. He was quite pleased with the five accountants who had been assigned to his team, especially Zeke Olds. Olds was an Army vet who had returned to school to get a double major in accounting and computer sciences. He was on top of the latest developments in financial information systems and had a reputation for coming up with innovative solutions to problems. (Rest of case not shown due to length.)

1. If you were Palmer at the end of the case, how would you respond?

2. What, if anything, could Palmer have done to avoid losing Olds?

3. What advantages and disadvantages of a matrix type organization are apparent from this case?

4. What could the management at M&M do to more effectively manage situations like this?

Paper For Above instruction

Bruce Palmer, upon reaching a pivotal point in his career as an account manager at Moss and McAdams (M&M), faces critical decisions regarding team management, talent retention, and organizational structure. This scenario encapsulates the complexities inherent in modern corporate environments, especially those that employ matrix organizational structures. Understanding Palmer's potential responses, the dynamics that could lead to the loss of talented employees like Zeke Olds, and the inherent characteristics of matrix organizations offers valuable insights into effective management practices.

In response to the situation at the end of the case, if I were Palmer, my primary focus would be on fostering open communication and understanding the root causes leading to Olds's dissatisfaction or potential departure. Recognizing Olds’s unique expertise in financial systems and his innovative approach, I would prioritize creating a supportive environment that leverages his skills while addressing his concerns. This could involve scheduling one-on-one meetings to discuss his career aspirations, workload management, and any issues he perceives within the team or organization. Additionally, I would consider providing professional development opportunities tailored to his interests in technology and finance, which can enhance his engagement and loyalty. Recognizing his contributions publicly can also boost morale, showing that the company values innovation and expertise.

To prevent the loss of Olds, Palmer could have implemented strategic retention practices from the outset. This includes offering clear career advancement pathways, competitive compensation, and opportunities for professional growth. Mentoring programs involving senior management can also foster a sense of belonging and value, especially for high-potential employees with specialized skills. Furthermore, ensuring task variety and challenging projects can keep talented individuals engaged and motivated. Understanding Olds’s aspirations and aligning his roles accordingly would have been essential in this regard. Moreover, establishing an organizational culture that values innovation and provides recognition can significantly increase employee satisfaction. Palmer’s proactive engagement with Olds's interests and aspirations could have built a stronger loyalty to M&M.

Regarding the advantages of a matrix organizational structure illustrated by the case, one significant benefit is flexibility. Employees like Olds with specialized skills can work across multiple projects, contributing their expertise efficiently. This structure also promotes better communication and collaboration across different functions, fostering innovation. Agile decision-making in such organizations allows for rapid adaptation to changing business needs, which is crucial in dynamic industries such as accounting and financial consulting. However, considerable disadvantages are also evident. The dual authority lines in a matrix can cause confusion and conflict regarding priorities, leading to dissatisfaction among employees. Ambiguity in reporting relationships may result in overlapping responsibilities, decreased accountability, and potential power struggles. The case highlights how management challenges, such as balancing technical expertise with organizational priorities, can complicate team cohesion and employee morale.

To manage such situations more effectively, M&M’s management should focus on clear communication and establishing well-defined roles within the matrix structure. Developing comprehensive policies that specify reporting relationships, responsibilities, and decision-making authority can minimize confusion. Implementing conflict resolution mechanisms and promoting a culture of collaboration and transparency would help address employee concerns preemptively. Additionally, training managers and employees in the nuances of the matrix setup can improve understanding and cooperation. Investing in employee engagement initiatives, including career development programs tailored for high-potential staff, ensures retention of critical talent like Olds. Furthermore, fostering a culture that values innovation and recognizes contributions can create an environment where employees feel appreciated and motivated to stay committed to organizational goals. Adjustments in organizational policies focusing on communication, role clarity, and employee development are essential to managing the unique demands of a matrix organization effectively.

References

• Galbraith, J. R. (2009). Designing Matrix Organizations That Actually Work: How IBM, Procter & Gamble, and Others Design for Success. Jossey-Bass.
• Larson, E. W., & La Fasto, F. M. (1989). Teamwork: How to Get It. Sage Publications.
• Mullins, L. J. (2016). Management and Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education.
• Daft, R. L. (2015). Organization Theory and Design. Cengage Learning.
• Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Chafkin, M. (2018). The Challenges of Managing Matrix Structures. Harvard Business Review.
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Prentice-Hall.
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
• Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education.
• Clegg, S. R., & Kornberger, M. (2006). Organization, Symbol and Strategy. SAGE Publications Ltd.