Budget Allocations Prepare Prior To Completing This Discussi

Budget Allocations prepare prior To Completing This Discussion Readri

Human Services and care are provided in many formats.

You have been asked to serve on the Board of Directors of the Community Foundation of Southwest Missouri INC. After you have started with the Board you are placed on the grant allocation subcommittee. Your committee is charged with the distribution of grants and with a focus on Joplin Mo. Joplin, as noted above, was devastated by a tornado in May 2011. The community is still recovering and over stressed human service programs still work hard to provide services.

Your organization received a donation from The Duke Endowment (Links to an external site.) for a total of $170,000. Your organization must distribute the money throughout the community. The foundation received over 30 applications but narrowed this to eight applicants listed in the Reflection section along with the amounts requested. There is $290,000 applied for in regard to this money. Each member of your subcommittee has been asked to submit who they would like to recommend the money go to and how much they would receive.

It is suggested that only five applicants receive money. In this discussion of 350 words present the five organizations that will receive money and to what amount. In the discussion utilize these prompts: Identify who you have chosen and how much will they receive. Explain the criteria you used to select them and the amount. Describe the requirements you used in selecting the five applicants. Explain if your selected programs met all your requirements. Reflect on your HHS ethics and values and how these influenced your choices.

Paper For Above instruction

The aftermath of the 2011 tornado in Joplin, Missouri, left a community still struggling with recovery, especially for vulnerable populations dependent on human services. Allocating a limited grant fund of $170,000 from The Duke Endowment requires careful deliberation and ethical consideration. Based on community needs, application strength, alignment with recovery priorities, and ethical principles, I recommend funding five organizations that best serve these criteria.

The first organization is Big Brothers – Big Sisters, which requested $30,000 to support children coping with disaster-related PTSD through volunteer training. Given the increased mental health needs among children and the importance of early intervention, this initiative is vital. It meets the criteria of addressing vulnerable populations and providing mental health support, aligning with the community’s urgent post-disaster needs. I allocate $30,000 to ensure they can expand their volunteer training program to reach more affected children.

Secondly, the Children’s Center requested $30,000 to establish a family counseling program dedicated to investigating child abuse and offering support in the aftermath. The tornado's chaos has heightened risks of child maltreatment, and the availability of localized, specialized services is crucial. This project aligns with the importance of safeguarding children and promoting family stability, meeting the ethical obligation to protect vulnerable groups. I recommend funding them with $30,000 to initiate or expand their counseling services quickly.

The third selection is Joplin NALA, which asked for $30,000 to foster literacy skills and enhance learning opportunities for adults and English language learners affected by the disaster. Education supports community resilience, promotes economic recovery, and reduces long-term vulnerabilities. This aligns with ethical principles of promoting equity and empowerment. I allocate $30,000, emphasizing the importance of adult education as a foundation for rebuilding.

The Fourth organization is the Alliance of SWMO requesting $35,000 for a parenting training program focused on preventing child abuse. Strengthening parental skills can mitigate risks of future abuse and contribute to community healing. The program addresses a critical gap, promoting prevention and community safety, which aligns with ethical commitments to social justice and safeguarding. I recommend funding this with $35,000.

Finally, the Spiva Center for the Arts applied for $35,000 to develop a summer art program for children. Artistic expression supports emotional recovery and provides a constructive outlet for children affected by trauma. This project aligns with holistic approaches to disaster recovery, fostering resilience and mental well-being. Allocating $35,000 supports community healing through creative engagement, a value consistent with holistic human services ethics.

In selecting these five recipients, I adhered to criteria emphasizing immediate impact on vulnerable populations, mental health support, safety, education, prevention, and community resilience. The selected programs address urgent community needs and align with ethical principles of beneficence, justice, and respect for persons. These decisions reflect my commitment to ethical service and the foundational values of human services — promoting well-being, safeguarding vulnerable groups, and fostering community recovery. This allocation aims to maximize positive impact within our limited resources, guided by ongoing ethical reflection and stakeholder needs.

References

• Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Corey, C. (2018).  Issues & Ethics in the Helping Professions (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• National Organization for Human Services. (2015). Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.nationalhumanservices.org/ethics-code
• Hodge, D., & Nadir, S. (2014). Ethical issues in disaster mental health. Journal of Social Service Research, 40(5), 591-602.
• Frazier, P., Petrolino, J., & Craig, T. (2017). Ethical considerations in disaster mental health response. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48(5), 366-373.
• Resilience in Disaster Recovery. (2020). Community-based approaches to recovery. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(8), 240-252.
• Fisher, C. B. (2017). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Sage Publications.
• Sullivan, C. M. (2014). Disaster mental health ethics and considerations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(6), 543-552.
• Williams, R., & Nelson, T. (2019). Mental health and community resilience post-disaster. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63(1-2), 99-113.
• U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2016). Ethical principles and guidelines for disaster response. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov
• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA Publications.