Bus 117 Week 1 Day 2 Sources Of Emotions And Moods

Bus117 W1d2sources Of Emotions And Moodshave You Ever Said, “I Got Up

Have you ever experienced a day where you felt irritable or unwell, or found yourself snapping at others without a clear reason? These instances often prompt us to reflect on the origins of our emotions and moods. Emotions and moods are influenced by various factors, including biological, psychological, and social elements. Understanding these sources is crucial for managing emotional responses effectively, especially in professional settings where emotional labor plays a significant role.

One primary source of emotions in the workplace is emotional labor. Emotional labor involves employees managing their feelings to fulfill organizational expectations during interpersonal interactions. This concept was initially studied within service industries, where employees are required to project specific emotions regardless of their actual feelings. For example, flight attendants are expected to be cheerful, funeral directors exhibit sadness, and doctors maintain emotional neutrality. Yet, emotional labor extends beyond these roles, affecting most jobs where employees must maintain professionalism and courtesy, even in challenging interactions.

The process of emotional labor often leads to emotional dissonance, a discrepancy between felt and displayed emotions. When employees must display emotions they do not genuinely experience, it can result in emotional exhaustion and burnout. This tension is especially evident when employees encounter difficult coworkers or clients, requiring them to mask negative feelings such as frustration, resentment, or hostility. Over time, suppressing genuine emotions can threaten emotional well-being and work performance.

Understanding the distinction between felt and displayed emotions provides insight into emotional regulation at work. Felt emotions are authentic, internal experiences, whereas displayed emotions are outward expressions that conform to organizational display rules. These rules are learned behaviors, such as masking sadness with a smile at a funeral or appearing joyful at a wedding, regardless of personal feelings. For instance, a manager giving a negative performance review might need to maintain a serious demeanor, even if they feel anger or disappointment inside.

The expression of emotions can involve surface acting or deep acting. Surface acting entails faking emotions to meet display rules, often by suppressing genuine feelings. For example, a salesperson who forces a smile despite feeling upset is engaging in surface acting. Deep acting, by contrast, involves attempts to modify internal feelings to align with expected emotional displays. Healthcare providers, for instance, may genuinely try to feel more empathy for patients through deep acting. Research indicates that surface acting is more stressful because it involves emotional dissonance and superficial regulation, which tends to be exhausting over time.

The importance of managing emotional labor effectively is evident in the impact it has on employee health and performance. Allowing employees to relax and recharge during breaks can mitigate the negative effects of surface acting. For example, a study found cheerleading instructors who used breaks to rest and relax were more effective afterward, whereas those who engaged in chores did not experience the same benefits. This highlights the significance of authentic relaxation for emotional recovery and maintaining optimal performance.

In conclusion, emotions and moods originate from complex interactions among internal feelings, organizational expectations, and social contexts. Emotional labor, through the regulation of felt and displayed emotions, plays a vital role in shaping emotional experiences at work. Recognizing the differences between surface and deep acting can help organizations promote healthier emotional regulation strategies, thereby reducing burnout and enhancing employee well-being and productivity.

Paper For Above instruction

Emotions and moods are fundamental aspects of human experience that influence our behavior and interactions in both personal and professional contexts. Understanding the primary sources of emotions and moods, especially within the framework of emotional labor, can provide insights into managing emotional well-being effectively. This comprehensive analysis explores the origins of emotions and moods, focusing on the concept of emotional labor, its implications, and strategies for emotional regulation within the workplace.

At the core, emotions are complex, transient psychological states that arise in response to specific stimuli, while moods are more diffuse and longer-lasting affective states influenced by a variety of internal and external factors. The biological basis of emotions involves neurological processes and hormonal responses that prepare us for action. Psychologically, emotions are shaped by individual experiences, perceptions, and cognitive appraisals. Social factors, including cultural norms and interpersonal interactions, also significantly influence emotional responses.

In the context of work, emotional labor emerges as a key factor shaping emotional experiences. Coined by Arlie Hochschild in the 1980s, emotional labor refers to the process by which employees manage their feelings to meet organizational display rules. This is particularly prevalent in service industries, where customer satisfaction hinges on employees' ability to maintain positive emotional expressions. Airlines expect their staff to be cheerful, while funeral directors are expected to convey solemnity—regardless of their true feelings. Such regulation requires considerable effort and can have significant psychological consequences.

The distinction between felt emotions and displayed emotions offers a nuanced understanding of emotional regulation. Felt emotions are genuine internal experiences, whereas displayed emotions are external expressions dictated by social and organizational norms. The regulation of these emotions involves either surface acting or deep acting. Surface acting entails superficial faking of emotions, which often leads to emotional dissonance—a psychological conflict resulting from incongruence between internal feelings and outward expressions. On the other hand, deep acting involves efforts to alter internal feelings to match professional expectations, thus creating a sense of authentic emotional expression.

Surface acting, though sometimes necessary, is associated with greater stress and emotional exhaustion due to its superficial nature. Employees engaging in surface acting often suppress their true feelings, leading to emotional dissonance and burnout. Deep acting, by contrast, can foster more genuine interactions and reduce emotional strain, although it requires greater emotional effort. Healthcare providers, for example, may use deep acting to sincerely feel empathy for patients, which leads to more authentic care and less emotional fatigue.

The importance of managing emotional labor effectively is reinforced by research emphasizing the benefits of authentic emotional expressions and proper emotional regulation strategies. Providing employees with opportunities to relax and recover during breaks can buffer the negative impacts of emotional dissonance. Studies on activities like resting and relaxation during breaks have demonstrated improvements in subsequent performance and emotional well-being. Conversely, engaging in chores or other stressful activities during breaks can diminish these benefits, underscoring the need for restorative downtime.

Organizations can foster healthier emotional climates by implementing training programs that enhance emotional regulation skills, promoting genuine emotional expressions, and supporting employees’ emotional health. Recognizing the signs of emotional exhaustion and burnout is critical for intervention, as sustained emotional labor without adequate recovery can compromise both employee well-being and organizational effectiveness. Strategies such as mindfulness, stress management, and fostering authentic workplace interactions can mitigate the adverse effects of emotional labor and nurture a resilient workforce.

Understanding the multifaceted sources of emotions and moods—including biological, psychological, and social influences—provides a comprehensive view of human affective experiences. Emotional labor, by requiring individuals to regulate their expressions regularly, significantly impacts well-being and performance. Consequently, organizations must prioritize emotional health by creating environments that support authentic emotional exchanges and provide avenues for emotional recovery.

In summary, emotions and moods are shaped by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, and their regulation through emotional labor is essential for effective functioning. Recognizing the distinction between felt and displayed emotions, as well as employing appropriate regulation strategies like deep acting, can improve emotional well-being for employees. Ultimately, fostering an organizational culture that values genuine emotional expression and emotional resilience can lead to healthier, more productive workplaces.

References

• Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 97-115.
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press.
• Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2002). Testing a conservation of resources model of the emotional labor process. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(1), 57-67.
• Humphrey, R. H., Ashford, S. J., & Iwanicki, S. (2000). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives on emotional exhaustion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 155-164.
• Zapf, D. (2002). Emotional labor and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 237-268.
• Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives on emotional exhaustion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 995-1012.
• Gross, J. J. (1998). The experience and regulation of emotion. Psychological Review, 105(1), 55-81.
• Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 986-1010.
• Pugh, S. D., Groth, M., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2011). Alcohol and emotion regulation: An examination of emotional labor, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 712-723.
• Brotheridge, C. M., & Grandey, A. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives on emotional exhaustion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 895-906.