Bus 210 Module Six Assignment Guidelines And Rubric Overview ✓ Solved

Bus 210 Module Six Assignment Guidelines And Rubricoverviewin This Ass

Evaluate a current organizational structure and recommend structural changes that can help address the concerns the organization identified regarding collaboration, communication, and autonomy. Create an updated organizational structure chart. Write a brief explanation of your recommended changes, how they differ from the original, and how they will impact organizational and team communication.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In modern organizational management, adapting the structure to meet evolving needs related to collaboration, communication, and autonomy is crucial. This paper presents an assessment of a traditional organization transitioning towards a more flexible structure that encourages innovation and employee empowerment. Based on the scenario provided, a new organizational chart is proposed, accompanied by an explanation of the proposed changes and their implications on communication and team dynamics.

Current Organizational Structure and Challenges

The existing structure is highly formalized with a broad span of control, which historically suited the organization’s need for regulation and standardization. Managers oversee multiple departments and functions without requiring in-depth knowledge of specific technical tasks. While this structure provided consistency and control, it led to underutilized employee talent, minimal team cohesion, and limited innovation. The recent shift towards greater autonomy has resulted in management overwhelm due to insufficient direct oversight and communication. Employees express frustrations regarding the lack of communication, leading to duplicated efforts and missed updates, exposing the need for a more integrated and flexible structure.

Proposed Organizational Structure Changes

The new organizational chart introduces a hybrid structure combining functional and team-based elements with clear reporting lines that facilitate communication flow. Key changes include:

• Establishment of Cross-Functional Teams: Instead of solely functional departments, temporary or semi-permanent cross-functional teams are formed to work on specific projects or initiatives, promoting collaboration and knowledge sharing.
• Layered Management Levels: Introducing middle management or Team Leads to reduce managers’ span of control and allow for more direct oversight and coaching of team members.
• Decentralized Decision-Making: Empowering teams and team leads to make operational decisions, enhancing autonomy while maintaining alignment with organizational goals.
• Improved Communication Channels: Regular team meetings, integrated project management tools, and communication platforms are implemented to ensure timely updates and reduce duplicated work.

Reasoning for Changes and Benefits

The proposed modifications aim to balance the benefits of autonomy with the need for structured oversight and effective communication. By creating cross-functional teams, the organization fosters collaboration, innovation, and utilization of specialized skills. The introduction of team leads or middle managers reduces managerial overload and provides more direct employee support. Decentralizing decision-making enhances responsiveness and employee engagement. These changes contrast with the previous highly centralized, rules-based approach by allowing more flexibility and customized team interactions, which are vital for creative and technical work environments.

Impact on Organizational Communication

The restructured organization enhances communication by establishing clearer channels via dedicated team meetings, digital communication tools, and formalized reporting procedures. The integration of project management platforms ensures information sharing is streamlined, real-time, and accessible to relevant stakeholders, reducing the risks of miscommunication and duplicated efforts. This systematic approach improves transparency and accountability across the organization.

Impact on Team Communication and Reporting Structure

The team-based approach fosters open communication and collaboration, encouraging employees to share ideas freely and seek assistance when necessary. The flatter hierarchy with defined team leads facilitates quicker decision-making and feedback loops, reducing bureaucratic delays. The reporting structure becomes more direct and project-focused, promoting a culture of shared responsibility and collective problem-solving. Overall, these adjustments lead to more engaged teams, better alignment with organizational goals, and greater adaptability to change.

Conclusion

Adapting the organizational structure is essential for supporting collaboration, communication, and employee autonomy. The proposed changes — forming cross-functional teams, establishing middle management, decentralizing decision-making, and enhancing communication tools — will position the organization to better meet its current and future challenges. These improvements will foster a more dynamic, engaged, and innovative work environment, ultimately contributing to the organization’s success.

References

• Galbraith, J.R. (2014). Designing Organizations: Strategy, Structure, and Process at the Business Unit and Enterprise Levels. Jossey-Bass.
• Robbins, S.P., & Coulter, M. (2016). Management (13th ed.). Pearson.
• Daft, R.L. (2018). Organization Theory and Design (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Tavistock Publications.
• Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., & Hoskisson, R.E. (2017). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice-Hall.
• Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Schein, E.H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Heracleous, L., & Wirtz, J. (2014). A Strategic Framework for Managing Service Innovation. Journal of Service Management, 25(3), 335-354.
• Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Johnson, D., Sandholtz, K., & Younger, J. (2008). HR Competencies: Mastery at the Intersection of People and Business. Society for Human Resource Management.