Bus 472 Unit 3 Assignment Template Instructions Fill In

Sheet1bus472 Unit 3 Assignment Templateinstructions Fill In The Only

Describe and analyze various aspects of risk assessment and market analysis for a project and proposed business. The assignment includes qualitative and quantitative risk assessments, cost calculations, complexity weighting, and market research, culminating in a business feasibility recommendation supported by research references.

Paper For Above instruction

In today's dynamic project management and business planning landscape, understanding and evaluating risks, costs, and market potential are critical for success. This comprehensive analysis provides insights into qualitative and quantitative risk assessments, cost estimations, complexity evaluations, and market analysis to inform strategic decision-making.

Qualitative Risk Assessment and Management Strategies

Risk assessment begins with identifying potential risk factors that could jeopardize a project's success. The provided risk factors include key personnel withdrawal, economic downturn, funding cuts, scope changes, and poor specification performance. Each risk's likelihood is rated as high, medium, or low, shaping the overall risk profile.

For example, the risk of key team members being pulled off the project is rated high, owing to potential unforeseen circumstances such as health issues or resignations, making it a significant threat with high likelihood and high consequences. Conversely, poor specification performance might have low likelihood but could still entail high consequences if it hampers project deliverables.

Classifying these risks based on their consequence levels—low, medium, high—relies on experience and contextual judgment. For instance, scope changes, rated high in likelihood, could have high consequences by disrupting timelines or budgets, thus requiring prioritized mitigation strategies.

Risk matrix populates these assessments, illustrating the relationship between likelihood and consequences. Risks like 'project scope changes' could be classified as medium-high, demanding proactive mitigation, such as clear scope management and stakeholder communication. Risks with low consequences and likelihood, like poor spec performance, might require less aggressive strategies but should still be monitored.

Mitigation strategies are tailored to each risk. For high-threat risks like team member attrition, mitigation could include implementing retention programs or cross-training, ensuring project continuity. For funding cuts, diversifying funding sources or establishing reserve budgets could serve as mitigation. Prioritization of efforts depends on analyzing both the likelihood and impact, focusing first on risks that could cause the most damage if realized, such as key team loss or scope changes.

Quantitative Risk Assessment

Quantitative assessment involves calculating the overall project risk factor based on probabilistic data. Given probabilities of failure and consequences for each risk attribute—maturity, cost, complexity, schedule, dependency, performance—the combination yields a quantified risk measure.

Using the provided data: Probability of failure (Pf) is calculated by multiplying the probability of failure (0.3) with the respective consequence (e.g., 0.1 for cost), and summing these across all factors provides a combined risk measure (RF). This aggregated risk indicates the project's overall exposure.

Calculating RF involves assessing the weighted impact of each factor. For instance, schedule risk, with a high probability (0.7) and consequence (0.5), contributes significantly to RF. A high RF suggests a high-risk project requiring substantial mitigation or contingency planning. Classification of risk—low, medium, high—is derived from RF thresholds, guiding project management actions effectively.

Cost of Labor Computation

Analyzing labor costs involves multiplying each team member's hours needed by their respective overhead charge, personal time rate, and hourly rate, adjusted for overhead and loaded costs. For example:

• Sandy: 60 hours × 1.35 overhead × 1.12 personal rate × $18 hourly rate = $1,290.24
• Chuck: 80 hours × 1.75 overhead × 1.12 personal rate × $31 hourly rate = $4,887.68
• Bob: 80 hours × 1.35 overhead × 0 personal rate × $9 hourly rate = $972
• Penny: 40 hours × 1.75 overhead × 1.12 personal rate × $0 (since rate is zero) = $0

Total labor costs are the sum of individual costs, forming a basis for project budgeting and resource allocation.

Planned and Cumulative Costs

Cost planning involves distributing budgets across work packages and tracking cumulative expenses over project weeks. For example, staffing costs of $500, $400, $100 across weeks, and similarly for other tasks like blueprinting, prototyping, and full design, facilitate performance tracking and variance analysis.

Calculating cumulative costs helps ensure project remains within budget, identify overruns early, and inform decision-making regarding resource adjustments or scope modifications.

Complexity Cost Weighting and Function Point Analysis

Function point analysis estimates project size based on system complexity. The provided data assigns weights to different functions—inputs, outputs, interfaces, queries, files—and multiplies by complexity levels—low, medium, high—using predefined weighting schemes. For example, low complexity inputs have a weight of 2, outputs 3, interfaces 6, queries 4, and files 2.

Calculating total function points involves multiplying the number of each function by their respective weights. The total function points serve as a basis for estimating development effort and cost. Assuming each resource can process five function points per month, and a programmer’s monthly cost is $4,000, total development time and cost can be predicted accurately, guiding budgeting and staffing decisions.

Market Analysis and Business Feasibility

A comprehensive market analysis encompasses a description of the business, target market, competitive landscape, and market potential. For instance, if proposing a manufacturing business for specialized exercise equipment, the target market might include fitness centers and consumers seeking high-end gear.

Researching competitors such as NordicTrack reveals market positioning and differentiation opportunities. Estimating market size involves analyzing demographic and industry data; for example, if the target market comprises 300,000 potential buyers with an average price of $500, then the market size is worth $150 million.

Using the expected value approach, businesses can incorporate optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely scenarios to refine forecasts. For example, under most likely assumptions, the market value might be $150 million, with a certain probability of achieving a particular market share.

Estimating a realistic market share—say 5% of the total market—yields a specific target revenue (e.g., $5.1 million). Such data guides business viability assessments and resource planning.

Based on the compiled data, a decision can be made whether to proceed. Factors influencing this decision include projected profitability, competitive advantages, operational feasibility, and alignment with strategic objectives.

Supporting the analysis with credible sources such as industry reports, government statistics, and academic research enhances the reliability of conclusions and ensures informed decision-making supported by scholarly and authoritative data.

Conclusion

Thorough risk assessments, cost evaluations, and market analysis are essential components of strategic planning. By combining qualitative insights with quantitative data, managers and entrepreneurs can minimize uncertainties, allocate resources efficiently, and make informed go/no-go decisions. The integration of solid research and methodical analysis strengthens the foundation for successful project execution and market entry, ultimately contributing to sustainable growth and profitability.

References

• Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). PMI.
• Karim, M., & Safari, A. (2019). Risk Management in Project Planning: A Systematic Review. Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 221-234.
• Chen, X., & Zhao, J. (2020). Cost Estimation Techniques in Engineering Projects. International Journal of Engineering Management, 37(3), 151-165.
• Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of Project Management. AMACOM.
• Farris, P. W., Kilian, K. A., & Reed, R. (2020). Market Analysis and Estimation Methods. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 68-85.
• International Function Point User Group. (2022). Function Point Counting Practices Manual (Release 4.3.1). IFPUG.
• Davidson, L., & Boehm, B. (2018). Cost Estimation and Software Metrics. IEEE Software, 35(1), 102-109.
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2023). Market Size and Market Value Data. U.S. Census Bureau Reports.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
• Harvard Business Review. (2021). Strategic Market Analysis for New Business Ventures. HBR Publishing.