Bus311 Managerial Communications Unit 1 Assignment

Bus311 Managerial Communications Unit 1 Assignment Communicat

This assignment requires students to utilize the Framework for Ethical Decision Making to evaluate whether to engage in using unauthorized sources or plagiarizing someone else's work. Additionally, students must apply the CAM (Character, Audience, Message) model to analyze how to respond to an employer regarding a job offer scenario involving a better opportunity received shortly after accepting an initial offer.

Specifically, students are to provide two to three sentence responses to each of the five questions within the Framework for Ethical Decision Making, covering legality, alignment with company policies, stakeholder impact, personal values, and emotional consequences of the decision. Subsequently, they must answer the CAM model questions with two to three sentences each, focusing on how to professionally respond to the employer when faced with multiple job offers.

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of decision making within professional environments, ethical considerations are paramount, particularly when it involves academic integrity or honest communication with employers. When faced with the dilemma of using unauthorized sources or plagiarizing, it is essential to carefully assess the situation through structured ethical frameworks such as the one proposed by Amy Newman. This process entails evaluating legal compliance, organizational policies, stakeholder impacts, personal values, and emotional repercussions, thereby ensuring that decisions align with both moral standards and professional expectations.

Firstly, the action’s legality must be scrutinized; using unauthorized sources or plagiarized material is generally illegal and constitutes academic misconduct or breach of copyright laws. Recognizing the legal ramifications helps prevent potential penalties and legal actions that could jeopardize one’s reputation and future opportunities. Secondly, alignment with organizational or personal policies is essential. Most educational institutions and companies explicitly prohibit plagiarism, emphasizing the importance of original work and adherence to ethical standards.

Thirdly, identifying stakeholders affected by such decisions is crucial. These include the educational institution, which enforces academic honesty policies, and the original creators of the work, whose intellectual property rights may be infringed upon. Additionally, peers and colleagues who rely on one's honesty for trustworthiness are impacted by such actions. Ethical decision making involves considering how one’s choices affect these stakeholders and maintaining integrity to foster trust and uphold standards.

Fourth, personal values guide ethical behavior. Most individuals value honesty, responsibility, and fairness, which conflict with dishonest practices like plagiarism. Aligning actions with these core values ensures moral consistency and self-respect. Lastly, considering emotional consequences, such as guilt, anxiety, or shame, reveals the internal cost of dishonest decisions. Acting ethically not only preserves external reputation but also promotes internal peace of mind.

Applying the CAM model further refines decision-making by contemplating Character, Audience, and Message when responding to an employer about a job decision. In this scenario, after accepting an initial job offer from NICE Company, the receipt of a better offer from THE BEST EVER Company raises ethical and professional considerations about how to communicate with the employer. It is paramount to approach this situation with honesty, respect, and tact.

From a character perspective, demonstrating integrity involves being transparent about the receipt of the new offer without exploiting the situation. The audience, comprising the employer, expects truthful and respectful communication; thus, informing them promptly and thoughtfully aligns with maintaining professionalism. The message should convey appreciation for the opportunity at NICE, explanation of the new circumstances, and a respectful notification of the decision to decline the position due to the better offer.

Engaging in honest communication reflects strong character and respects the employer's time and resources. Giving timely notice also demonstrates professionalism and consideration, which preserves future opportunities and relationships. Ultimately, applying these ethical and communicative principles ensures that the decision is handled with integrity, thereby minimizing potential negative repercussions and upholding personal and organizational credibility.

References

• Newman, A. (2022). Business Communication & Character. Post University.
• Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. Wiley.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living. HarperOne.
• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2021). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Butterfield, K. D., Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influence of Issue Involvement and Cognitive Moral Development. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3), 261–278.
• Scherer, R. C., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.
• Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51–71.
• Parboteeah, P., & Cullen, J. B. (2015). Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Business and Society, 54(2), 133–142.
• Shaw, W. H., & Barry, V. (2019). Moral Issues in Business. Cengage Learning.