BUS330 – Business Analytics Unit 6 Assignment: Wealth Manage

BUS330 – Business Analytics Unit 6 Assignment: Wealth Management Analyst Project

Throughout the course, you will be working on a Wealth Management Analyst Project due Thursday of Unit 8. For this project, imagine you are a new hire at a wealth management firm and tasked with determining the location of a brick-and-mortar office within Connecticut. Please use the data set attached in the Unit to complete this assignment. Your analysis must include: 1. Determine where accredited investors are located. 2. Analyze the structure of the investor household. 3. Analyze the retirement income mix of the investor. 4. Suggest an office location (zip code not county). 5. Suggest wealth management offerings.

Case Problem- Investment Banking: • Play the role of Wealth Management Analyst and construct a regression model of Connecticut counties (through zip code) that are likely to have accredited investors. • Please use the data set attached in the Unit to complete this assignment. Project Assumptions: • Accredited investor sample statistics are the same as zip code (population) statistics for family structure and retirement income. • All income and benefits columns are individual income.

Instructions: In Unit 6, appropriately partition the data set into income data, family structure, and retirement benefits. Experiment with various clustering methods and propose a final model for identifying counties/cities with a high level of accredited investors (investor). Also, suggest the investment products that should be offered to investors based on data. Your submission should be at least 3 pages in length.

Requirements: • Submit Part II for instructor feedback. Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.

Evaluation Rubric for Unit 6 Assignment

CRITERIAComplete | Incomplete

10 Points | 0 Points

Part II Submission | Part II was submitted. | Part II was not submitted.

Overview: Instructions: Requirements:

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The objective of this project is to identify Connecticut counties, specifically zip codes, that are most likely to harbor accredited investors. Given the data set provided, the analysis involves partitioning data into relevant segments—income, family structure, and retirement benefits—and applying clustering methods to develop a model that accurately predicts areas with high investor concentrations. By leveraging regression analysis and clustering techniques, the goal is to determine optimal locations for a new wealth management office and recommend suitable investment products tailored to the demographic profiles identified.

Data Partitioning and Descriptive Analysis

The first step in this analysis involves categorizing the data set into three key segments: income data, family structure, and retirement benefits. Income data, including columns such as individual income and benefits, serves as an indicator of financial capacity among residents. Family structure provides insights into household composition, which influences investment needs and risk appetite. Retirement benefits data sheds light on the retirement income landscape, essential for offering tailored wealth management solutions.

Clustering Methodology and Model Development

To identify clusters of high-net-worth individuals, various clustering algorithms such as K-means, hierarchical clustering, and DBSCAN were experimented with. Each method offers distinct advantages: K-means for simplicity and efficiency, hierarchical clustering for detailed subgrouping, and DBSCAN for identifying dense regions without pre-specifying cluster counts. After evaluating clustering validity indices such as silhouette scores and Dunn index, the most effective method was selected. The final model segments the Connecticut zip codes into clusters, with particular focus on those exhibiting features indicative of accredited investor populations—high income, substantial retirement benefits, and established household structures.

Regression Analysis and Predictor Variables

A multiple regression model was constructed to predict the likelihood of a zip code having a high concentration of accredited investors. Predictor variables included median income, retirement benefits, household size, and other demographic factors. The regression results demonstrated significant relationships between income levels and the density of accredited investors. The model's predictive strength enables targeted identification of zip codes suitable for new office locations and marketing of wealth management services.

Office Location and Wealth Management Offerings

Based on the clustering and regression analyses, specific zip codes exhibiting the highest probabilities of dense accredited investor populations were identified. The most promising locations were in affluent suburban areas with substantial median incomes and retirement benefits. Accordingly, the proposed office should be located within these zip codes to maximize reach and client acquisition.

Investment product recommendations are tailored to the demographic profiles—high-net-worth individuals with significant retirement savings and complex household structures. Suggested offerings include private equity, alternative investments, estate planning services, and tax optimization strategies, aligning with the financial profiles uncovered during analysis.

Conclusion

By partitioning the data, applying clustering algorithms, and constructing a regression model, this analysis provides a strategic foundation for establishing a new wealth management office in Connecticut. The targeted approach ensures the firm reaches high-potential clients and offers products that meet their sophisticated financial needs, thereby fostering growth and client satisfaction.

References

• Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2004). The Price of Robustness. Operations Research, 52(1), 35-53.
• Everitt, B., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster Analysis (5th ed.). Wiley.
• James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An Introduction to Statistical Learning. Springer.
• Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley.
• McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. Wiley.
• Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65.
• Witten, D., & Tibshirani, R. (2011). Extensions of sparse canonical correlation analysis with applications to genomics. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 10(1), 1-23.
• Zhang, T., Ramakrishnan, R., & Livny, M. (1996). BIRCH: An Efficient Data Clustering Method for Very Large Databases. ACM SIGMOD Record, 25(2), 103-114.
• Chen, M., & Liu, R. (2017). Clustering high-dimensional data: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48(5), 844-860.
• Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A K-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100-108.