Busi 644 Individual Project Part 1 Grading Rubric Student Cr

Busi 644individual Project Part 1 Grading Rubricstudentcriteria150

For this assignment, you will be completing a “Comfort in Social Situations” survey and reflecting on your results. The results may help identify implicit biases and how they may impact communication in the criminal justice field. Reflect on your survey results, compare them to your previous journal response regarding personal factors from Loden’s Wheel, identify any implicit or explicit biases, and explain how these biases and survey results may influence your communication in criminal justice.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Understanding implicit biases and their influence on communication is essential within the criminal justice field, where interactions often involve diverse individuals and complex social dynamics. This paper reflects on my personal results from the “Comfort in Social Situations” survey, compares these results with previous insights derived from Loden’s Wheel of Personal Factors, identifies implicit and explicit biases, and discusses their potential impact on communication in criminal justice settings.

Introduction

The awareness of implicit biases and personal factors that influence communication is fundamental for professionals working in criminal justice. Implicit biases are subconscious attitudes that can influence perceptions and actions, often contradicting one's explicit beliefs. The “Comfort in Social Situations” survey offers valuable insights into one’s level of comfort and potential biases in social interactions. This reflection aims to assess my survey results in the context of my personal characteristics identified earlier through Loden’s Wheel, recognize biases, and evaluate their potential influence on my professional communication.

Survey Results and Personal Factors

The survey results indicated a moderate level of comfort in social situations, aligning with my previous journal entries where I identified personal factors such as extraversion and openness, as described in Loden’s Wheel. My earlier reflection highlighted that my extroverted tendencies tend to facilitate open communication; however, there were also indications of discomfort in unfamiliar or tense social settings. These findings corroborate the survey, reinforcing that my social comfort levels vary depending on context and familiarity.

Comparing the survey outcomes with Loden’s Wheel reveals that my social comfort is intertwined with core personal factors like self-esteem, social confidence, and past experiences with authority figures or diverse populations. These factors influence my initial reactions and, consequently, my communication strategies when engaging with individuals in the criminal justice environment.

Implicit and Explicit Biases

Based on the survey, I identified implicit biases related to assumptions about unfamiliar individuals in social settings, often influenced by stereotypes associated with socioeconomic background and ethnicity. These biases are mostly subconscious, yet they may subtly affect my perceptions, leading to premature judgments or misunderstandings.

Explicit biases, on the other hand, are those I am consciously aware of, such as a commitment to fairness and non-discrimination, which I actively work to uphold. Acknowledging both implicit and explicit biases is vital for professional integrity and effective communication.

Impact of Biases and Survey Results on Communication

The survey results, coupled with identified biases, could influence my communication within criminal justice scenarios. For instance, discomfort in social interactions can hinder rapport-building with clients or colleagues, especially when dealing with individuals from different cultural backgrounds. Implicit biases, if unexamined, may lead to unintentional prejudgments, affecting the fairness and objectivity expected in criminal justice practice. Recognizing these biases enables me to implement strategies like mindfulness and active listening to mitigate their influence, fostering equitable and respectful interactions.

Furthermore, understanding personal factors from Loden’s Wheel helps me tailor my communication approach by leveraging my strengths, such as confidence, while addressing areas of discomfort. Continuous self-awareness and bias mitigation are crucial for maintaining professionalism and ensuring just outcomes in my work.

Conclusion

Reflecting on my survey results in conjunction with my personal factors underscores the importance of ongoing self-awareness regarding biases and social comfort levels. Recognizing implicit biases allows for deliberate efforts to prevent their negative impact on communication, safeguarding fairness and efficacy in criminal justice operations. Future focus should include targeted self-reflection, training, and exposure to diverse social environments to enhance social confidence and reduce biases, ultimately supporting a more impartial and effective criminal justice professional role.

References

• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.
• Loden, M. (1985). Loden's Wheel of Personal Factors. Management Development Journal, 3(2), 22–27.
• Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Implicit Social Cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(3), 319–324.
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
• DiAngelo, R. (2018). White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Beacon Press.
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
• Lind, E. A. (2001). When fairness is phenomenal: The psychology of fairness in organizations. In Social psychology of organizations (pp. 41–59). Sage Publications.
• Atwater, E., & Gillyard, T. (2020). Developing Cultural Competency in Criminal Justice Practices. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(4), 451–468.
• Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• Bonilla-Silva, E. (2014). Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. Rowman & Littlefield.