Business Research Assessment: Two Components ✓ Solved

Business Research Assessmentthere Are Two Components To The Assessmen

The assessment for the module consists of two components: a Learning Log and an Assignment Essay, each contributing 50% to the final grade. The Learning Log is an individual task documenting directed activities from units 3 and 8, with marks based on accuracy and thoroughness, including proper referencing where applicable. The written work should not exceed 1000 words.

The Assignment Essay requires a critique of a peer-reviewed research paper from a select list in management, focusing on the approach, rationale, background, context, data collection methods, and justification of findings. This critique should be no longer than 1000 words, excluding references and appendices if necessary. The selected paper should be from a high-quality journal, and the critique should demonstrate understanding and critical analysis.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The assessment for this module involves two distinct yet equally weighted components: a Learning Log and an Assignment Essay. Both serve different pedagogical purposes but collectively aim to deepen students’ understanding of research practices in management. The Learning Log acts as a reflective and evidentiary record of specific activities aligned with units 3 and 8, requiring clarity, accuracy, and appropriate academic referencing. Meanwhile, the Essay challenges students to critically analyze a scholarly article, demonstrating comprehension of research methodology, contextual background, and the validity of findings.

Learning Log Component

The Learning Log encourages students to engage actively with the unit activities and to articulate their learning process. When completing this component, students should emphasize their search strategies, such as selecting appropriate keywords and defining objectives at each stage. Documenting the process of source selection, including the use of relevant theories or frameworks, helps demonstrate scholarly rigor. For instance, when exploring stakeholder theory, students might employ keywords like "stakeholder analysis," "corporate social responsibility," or "stakeholder management." They should then succinctly summarize key insights gleaned from the literature, emphasizing trends, debates, or gaps identified during the search.

Assignment Essay Component

The core of the assignment involves a critical review of a research paper sourced from a reputable journal. The critique should include a clear exposition of the research approach and rationale, discussing why specific methodologies—qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods—were appropriate for the study’s objectives. An analysis of the study’s background and contextual factors should follow, highlighting how these influence the interpretation of the results. The data collection methods—such as surveys, interviews, or secondary data analysis—should be evaluated for their suitability and validity.

An essential part of the critique involves assessing the justification of the findings. Students should critically examine whether the conclusions are supported by the data, considering potential biases or limitations. This analysis demonstrates the student’s ability to interpret research findings critically and understand their practical implications within management contexts.

Throughout the essay, proper referencing of the selected paper and supporting literature is necessary. This demonstrates academic integrity and reinforces arguments. The document must be concise yet comprehensive, not exceeding 1000 words, to encourage focused analysis. An additional reference list can be included to support critical points and provide context to the critique.

Conclusion

Together, these components aim to develop critical thinking, research literacy, and reflective practice among students. The Learning Log fosters ongoing engagement and self-directed learning, while the Essay cultivates analytical skills and scholarly critique. By integrating these elements, students can better understand research methodologies, evaluate management literature effectively, and articulate their insights clearly and professionally.

References

• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
• Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106.
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
• Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
• Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 71-98.
• Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
• Perrini, F., & Tencati, A. (2006). Sustainability and stakeholder management: the limitations of the shareholder approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(5), 296-310.
• Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
• Heikkurinen, P., & London, K. (2016). Rethinking sustainability: exploring the importance of ethics and social justice and implications for management education. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 1–17.