You Have Just Been Hired As A Research Assistant For A Hospi ✓ Solved

You Have Just Been Hired As A Research Assistant For A Hospital Where

Create a PowerPoint presentation that examines historical issues in human research and how this relates to current research practices.

Select one of the articles listed above on the following historical research projects: Tuskegee Syphilis Study, Henrietta Lacks, Nazi Medical Experiments, or Thalidomide Trials. The presentation should address the following: Define ethics in human research and identify how ethics are presented in the article. Explain the background and hypothesis of the historical research project. Explain the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and note examples of protections for research participants. If there was no IRB, explain how having one could have helped ensure ethical standards were maintained.

Using current principles outlined by the IRB that govern human research, identify the principles that were violated. Provide an explanation regarding the violations and how these violations would have been avoided using current research practices. The presentation should be visually appealing with colors, graphics, and keywords. Use the notes section below each slide to write the details of what would be said during a live presentation. This allows you to show your understanding and critical thinking skills to the instructor.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Historical unethical human research projects have profoundly impacted current ethical standards and regulations guiding human research. Recognizing these past violations helps safeguard participants' rights and well-being today. In this paper, I will analyze the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, highlighting its ethical breaches, the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and how contemporary principles could have prevented such unethical practices.

Background and Hypothesis of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study

The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, conducted between 1932 and 1972 by the U.S. Public Health Service, aimed to observe the natural progression of untreated syphilis in African American males. The hypothesis was that the disease would progress differently in untreated African Americans compared to other populations. Participants were misled about the nature of the study, believing they received treatment when they did not, even after penicillin became a standard treatment in the 1940s.

Definition of Ethics in Human Research and Its Presentation in the Article

Ethics in human research refer to guidelines ensuring the rights, safety, and well-being of participants. Principles include autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice (Belmont Report, 1979). The article vividly illustrates violations of these principles, such as lack of informed consent and exploitation of vulnerable populations.

The Role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Participant Protections

The IRB reviews research proposals to ensure ethical standards are met, including informed consent, risk minimization, and equitable subject selection. During the Tuskegee Study, an IRB was not involved until much later. Today, IRBs would require transparency, informed consent, and risk-benefit assessments to protect subjects.

How an IRB Could Have Ensured Ethical Standards

If an IRB had overseen this study initially, it would have mandated informed consent, monitored ongoing risks, and ensured the study's scientific validity, thereby preventing exploitative practices and promoting ethical standards.

Violations of Current Ethical Principles and How They Could Have Been Avoided

The Tuskegee Experiment violated core principles: it grossly breached autonomy through deception, beneficence by withholding treatment, and justice by exploiting a vulnerable population. Applying current practices like informed consent, independent review, and ongoing monitoring would have averted these violations.

Conclusion

Understanding historical unethical research informs current ethical standards and regulatory systems like the IRB. The Tuskegee Study exemplifies the importance of strict adherence to ethical principles to protect human subjects and maintain public trust in research.

References

• Belmont Report. (1979). Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
• Gamble, V. N. (1997). An examination of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and its relevance today. American Journal of Public Health, 87(11), 1773-1777.
• Jones, J. H. (1993). Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Free Press.
• Reverby, S. M. (2009). Tuskegee's Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. University of North Carolina Press.
• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report.
• Shavers, V. L., & Shavers, A. L. (2004). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study and its impact on African Americans. Journal of the National Medical Association, 96(11), 1427-1432.
• Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). (2021). Historical unethical research. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
• Rothman, D. J. (2003). Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. Oxford University Press.
• Heimer, C. A. (2014). Institutional review boards and human subjects research: The evolution of oversight. Public Health Reports, 129(2), 113-120.
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Finding a Path to Safety in Laboratory Animal Research. The National Academies Press.