Business Strategic Management And Integration PowerPoint ✓ Solved

Business Strategic Management And Integrationneed Power Point Pre

Evaluate the quality of McDonald's Corporation in terms of management, the board of directors, and shareholder activism. Determine if the issues listed are favorable or unfavorable for sound corporate governance.

Paper For Above Instructions

Business Strategic Management and Integration is essential for companies like McDonald’s Corporation, which operates as the world’s largest fast-food restaurant chain with substantial revenue. With a reported revenue of $28 billion in 2012, McDonald's exhibited remarkable growth, particularly with its shareholder value increasing by over 50% from May 2010 to May 2013 (McDonald's Corporation, 2013). In this paper, we will evaluate the quality of McDonald's management, its board of directors, and the role of shareholder activism. Furthermore, we will assess whether the identified issues favor sound corporate governance.

Quality of Management at McDonald’s

McDonald’s management structure is pivotal to its sustained success. The company employs a systematic approach to management that promotes efficiency and effectiveness. The management at McDonald’s has demonstrated a keen ability to adapt to global market challenges, including changing consumer preferences towards healthier options and sustainable practices (Dyer & Singh, 1998). A focus on innovation, operational excellence, and customer satisfaction has fortified its brand presence worldwide.

However, some critiques highlight potential weaknesses in McDonald’s management. For instance, detractors often point to a lack of diversity within the management team and the challenge of responding to fast-evolving consumer needs (Crane & Matten, 2016). In contemporary corporate environments, an inclusive management structure that embraces diversity can enhance organizational decision-making, ultimately benefiting overall performance. Hence, the quality of management at McDonald’s is commendable but requires ongoing improvement to adapt to changing social expectations.

Assessment of the Board of Directors

The board of directors at McDonald’s plays a crucial role in overseeing the company's management and ensuring accountability. Composed of experienced professionals from various sectors, the board is responsible for establishing policies that guide corporate governance. The presence of independent directors is particularly important, as it mitigates potential conflicts of interest and enhances transparency (Li, 2010).

Despite these strengths, McDonald’s board has faced criticism regarding its composition and decision-making processes. Reports have suggested that a disproportionate number of board members have extensive backgrounds in the fast-food industry, which could potentially lead to groupthink and stifle innovation (Davis & Stout, 1992). Moreover, there have been calls for improved diversity in the board, as varied perspectives can drive better decision-making and reflect the company’s diverse customer base (Hunt, Layton, & Prince, 2015).

The Role of Shareholder Activism

Shareholder activism is increasingly becoming a significant factor in corporate governance, with investors demanding accountability and improved performance from management. McDonald’s has experienced its share of shareholder activism, particularly concerning its sustainability practices and labor policies. Activists have pressured the corporation to implement more ethical sourcing strategies and improve conditions for workers, aligning corporate policies with modern societal expectations (Benn, Dunphy, & Griffiths, 2014).

While such activism can pose challenges for management, it ultimately fosters a culture of accountability that can lead to more prudent decision-making and sustainable practices. Engaging with shareholders and addressing their concerns provides McDonald’s with an opportunity to enhance its corporate governance framework and strengthen its brand loyalty among consumers (O’Rourke, 2003).

Favorable or Unfavorable Issues for Corporate Governance

The issues identified in the evaluation of McDonald's management, board of directors, and shareholder activism reveal a mixed landscape in terms of corporate governance. The proactive approach of management in adapting to market changes and the board’s commitment to accountability are undeniably positive. However, concerns about diversity and the potential for groupthink within the board suggest areas for improvement (Bebchuk & Cohen, 2005).

Additionally, while shareholder activism has prompted necessary discussions around sustainability and ethical practices, it may also distract from core business operations if not managed effectively. Striking a balance between addressing activist concerns and maintaining operational focus is crucial for McDonald's. Therefore, while there are favorable elements, notable challenges remain that could hinder sound corporate governance if not addressed swiftly.

Conclusion

In conclusion, McDonald’s Corporation offers an interesting case study in business strategic management and integration. The company’s successful management, a generally responsible board, and the influence of shareholder activism all contribute to its corporate governance narrative. Nevertheless, the issues highlighted point to the necessity for ongoing evaluation and adaptation as McDonald’s navigates the complexities of modern corporate responsibility and governance. Continuous improvement in these areas is essential for sustaining long-term shareholder value and maintaining McDonald's position as a leader in the fast-food industry.

References

• Bebchuk, L. A., & Cohen, A. (2005). The costs of entrapped boards. The Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 409-433.
• Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Griffiths, A. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Davis, G. F., & Stout, S. K. (1992). Boards of directors and corporate control: A social network perspective. California Management Review, 35(1), 257-270.
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
• Hunt, V. J., Layton, D., & Prince, S. (2015). Why diversity matters. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/why-diversity-matters
• Li, J. (2010). The board of directors and corporate governance: A review. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(1), 1-15.
• McDonald's Corporation. (2013). Annual report 2012. Retrieved from https://www.mcdonalds.com
• O’Rourke, D. (2003). A new politics of engagement: Big brands and their stakeholders. Development and Change, 34(2), 309-329.
• Patel, P. C. & Conklin, B. (2009). The role of shareholder activism in corporate governance: Insights from recent events. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 491-508.