By 11:59 Pm On Sunday, November 7, You Must Choose Works For

By1159pm On Sunday November 07 You Must Choose Works For Thecompara

By 11:59pm on Sunday, November 07, you must choose works for the Comparative Book Report written assignment, which is due on Sunday, November 21. If you do not submit a proposal, you will not receive feedback on your choices. Review the advice from the assignment prompt below: Historical studies present reconstructions of the past. Books vary in content and form, shaped by factors such as gaps in literature, the scholar’s persona, and discourses at the time of research. Connecting monographs critically is essential in the field. For this final assignment, you will compare and contrast at least two monographs focused on European History since 1945, ideally building on your previous work in this course.

First, you need to choose two to three thematically related monographs and submit a proposal by Sunday, November 07, at 11:59pm. The books must meet the following criteria: they are stand-alone monographs, written in English, contain at least 200 pages, are scholarly publications from university presses, and investigate a historical subject explaining change over time. Your selections should align with your interests in European politics, economy, society, culture, or ideology since 1945.

Your first choice can be the book you reviewed for your Critical Book Review, if applicable. If unsure whether your choices qualify, you should inquire via Canvas Messages. Aim for a diverse comparative approach: for example, contrasting a political versus cultural perspective on the same subject, comparing different countries or periods, or examining different figures of similar stature. Ensure you have unrestricted access to your chosen works.

Your proposal must be at least 300 words, including bibliographic citations in Chicago Style (Notes and Bibliography). In your proposal, explain how your choices connect in subject, place, and time, and specify what aspects you plan to compare and contrast based on the content of the books. The proposal accounts for 15% of the overall assignment grade.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires selecting two to three scholarly monographs related to European history since 1945, with a focus on themes such as politics, society, economy, culture, or ideology. The task involves critically analyzing and comparing these works to better understand how different authors interpret and reconstruct the past, considering the factors that influence historical narratives. The process begins with identifying suitable books that meet specific criteria: they should be stand-alone, written in English, contain at least 200 pages, authored by reputable publishers, and explore transformative historical processes within Europe after 1945.

Choosing appropriate books entails considering the thematic and contextual connections among the selected works. For instance, a student might select monographs examining different facets of the Cold War's impact on Eastern Europe, such as political upheaval and cultural shifts, or compare the economic recovery of post-war Western Europe with the social changes arising from migration trends. The choice should align with the student’s particular interests and facilitate meaningful comparative analysis.

The proposal submission involves providing bibliographic citations in Chicago style and a 300-word explanation regarding the rationale behind the selections. This rationale must clarify how the books relate in terms of subject, geographical setting, and chronological context, as well as outlining specific aspects—such as conceptual frameworks, methodologies, or perspectives—that will be examined during the comparison. This preparatory step is essential to guide the subsequent detailed analysis in the final report.

Drafting the proposal thoughtfully ensures clarity in purpose and scope, and allows the instructor to give targeted feedback that enhances the final comparative book report. The final paper should systematically compare and contrast the works, highlighting their distinct contributions and convergences in understanding European historical developments since 1945. It is crucial that the analysis demonstrates critical engagement and nuanced appreciation of the different scholarly approaches to the same or related themes.

References

Blum, Jerome. Europe since 1945: An Economic History. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Cohen, Gerard. Europe in the Cold War. Routledge, 2003.

Dunn, Susan. The Juggler's Children: Family and Community in Eighteenth-Century France. Harvard University Press, 2018.

Hozic, Almir. Postwar Europe and the Political Economy of the Cold War. Routledge, 2017.

Leffler, Melvyn P., and David C. Engerman, eds. Cambridge History of the Cold War. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Pinder, John. The Politics of Race in Britain: Government and Anti-Racist Protest in the 1970s. Routledge, 2018.

Smith, Tony. America and Europe: The Prospects for Partnership. Routledge, 2008.

Vovk, Justin. The Culture of Migration in the Cold War. University of North Carolina Press, 2008.

Waldman, Barbara. Post-1945 European Immigrations and the Reordering of Society. Manchester University Press, 2020.