Case 2: Ankle Pain In A 46-Year-Old Female

Case 2ankle Paina 46 Year Old Female Reports Pain In Both Of Her Ankl

Case 2: Ankle Pain A 46-year-old female reports pain in both of her ankles, but she is more concerned about her right ankle. She was playing soccer over the weekend and heard a "pop." She can bear weight, but it is uncomfortable. In determining the cause of the ankle pain, based on your knowledge of anatomy, what foot structures are likely involved? What other symptoms need to be explored? What are your differential diagnoses for ankle pain?

What physical examination will you perform? What special maneuvers will you perform? Should you apply the Ottawa ankle rules to determine if you need additional testing?

Paper For Above instruction

The case presents a 46-year-old female experiencing bilateral ankle pain, with a particular concern for her right ankle following an acute injury during soccer. A detailed assessment of her injury involves understanding ankle anatomy, exploring associated symptoms, establishing differential diagnoses, and determining appropriate physical examination techniques, including the use of Ottawa ankle rules for further testing decisions.

Anatomical Structures Involved

The ankle joint complex comprises several bones, ligaments, tendons, cartilage, and neurovascular structures. The primary bones involved include the tibia, fibula, and talus, which form the hinge joint responsible for dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. The lateral and deltoid ligaments stabilize the ankle, preventing excessive inversion and eversion, respectively. Tendons such as the peroneal tendons laterally and the posterior tibial and flexor tendons medially support joint function. Soft tissue structures like the joint capsule, articular cartilage, and synovium are vital in joint integrity and mobility.

In this scenario, the "pop" heard during trauma suggests possible ligamentous injury or bone fracture, specifically targeting structures like the anterior talofibular ligament (most commonly injured in ankle sprains), calcaneofibular ligament, and potentially involving the syndesmosis or the medial deltoid ligament. The ability to bear weight indicates that major structural compromise like a complete fracture may be less likely but not ruled out.

Additional Symptoms to Explore

Beyond pain, an exhaustive assessment should include querying for swelling, bruising, deformity, difficulty bearing weight, instability, stiffness, and nocturnal pain. The presence of swelling might suggest ligamentous injury or hematoma; bruising indicates bleeding within soft tissues. Deformity or asymmetry could indicate fractures or dislocations. Numbness or tingling could imply neurovascular compromise, especially if vascular injury is suspected. Investigating for locking or catching sensations may reveal intra-articular loose bodies or ligamentous disruption.

Differential Diagnoses

• particularly lateral ankle sprains involving anterior talofibular ligament
• distal fibula or lateral malleolus fracture, medial malleolus fracture, or talar fracture
• ankle ligament tears: deltoid or syndesmotic injuries
• tendinopathies or ruptures: peroneal tendons, Achilles tendon
• osteochondral fractures or loose bodies: from intra-articular injury
• arthritis or degenerative changes: especially in chronic cases, less likely acutely
• soft tissue contusions and hematomas

Physical Examination Approach

The physical examination begins with inspection, noting swelling, deformity, skin integrity, and bruising. Palpation should focus on bony landmarks—the lateral and medial malleoli, calcaneus, and base of the fifth metatarsal—as well as soft tissue structures. Range of motion assessment evaluates active dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, and eversion, noting any restrictions or pain elicited. Stability testing involves specific maneuvers to assess ligament integrity.

Key tests include:

• Ankle anterior drawer test: to assess anterior talofibular ligament integrity
• Talar tilt test: to evaluate the calcaneofibular and deltoid ligaments
• Fibular translation or syndesmotic squeeze test: to evaluate syndesmotic injury

Special Maneuvers

Special tests are essential for ligamentous assessment. The anterior drawer test involves stabilizing the tibia and pulling the calcaneus anteriorly; pain or a positive clunk indicates instability. The talar tilt test involves tilting the foot into inversion or eversion to stress lateral and medial ligaments, respectively. The squeeze test involves compressing the fibula and tibia to evaluate for syndesmotic injury. Additionally, neurovascular examination including distal pulse check, capillary refill, and sensory assessment helps rule out neurovascular compromise.

Application of Ottawa Ankle Rules

The Ottawa ankle rules are a validated clinical decision tool to determine the necessity for radiographs in ankle injuries. They recommend radiography if there is pain near the malleoli and any of the following: inability to bear weight immediately and in the emergency department for four steps, or tenderness along the distal 6 cm of the posterior edge of the distal fibula or tibia, or tenderness over the base of the fifth metatarsal or navicular.

Applying these rules helps to avoid unnecessary imaging, reducing costs and radiation exposure, while appropriately identifying fractures that require further intervention.

Conclusion

Effective management of ankle injuries relies on combining anatomical knowledge, comprehensive physical examination, and evidence-based decision rules like the Ottawa ankle rules. Recognizing the specific structures involved guides diagnosis and treatment while thorough symptom exploration ensures no associated injuries are overlooked. Use of special tests enhances detection of ligamentous damage, and application of clinical decision tools aids in judicious use of imaging studies. Such a systematic approach optimizes patient outcomes, ensures accurate diagnosis, and provides tailored management strategies for ankle trauma.

References

• Bleck, E. E., & Dunn, W. R. (2015). Ankle injuries including sprains and fractures. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 46(2), 183-192.
• Hertel, J. (2002). Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and biomechanics of lateral ankle instability. Journal of Athletic Training, 37(4), 364-375.
• Moore, K. L., & Dalley, A. F. (2018). Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Wolters Kluwer.
• Roettger, B. S., et al. (2004). Validation of the Ottawa ankle and foot rules. Emergency Radiology, 10(2), 59-63.
• Struijs, P. R., et al. (2004). The Ottawa ankle rules: a systematic review. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 43(4), 515-519.
• van Dijk, C. N., et al. (2010). Ankle instability: a review. Sports Medicine, 40(10), 745-768.
• Williams, R. J., et al. (2007). Diagnosis and management of lateral ankle ligament injuries. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 89(8), 1880-1887.
• Wojtys, E. M., & Grobler, T. G. (2014). A guide to ankle sprains and their management. Clinics in Sports Medicine, 33(2), 343-357.
• Yamamoto, Y., et al. (2001). Orofacial and ankle injuries associated with sports activities. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(2), 83-91.
• Zwipp, H., et al. (2015). Ankle fractures: a review. Orthopedic Reviews, 7(3), 5538.