Case 23 P 121, Case 9 Pp 130–131, And Case 10b P 95 Of Think
Case 23 P 121 Case 9 Pp 130 131 And Case 10b P 95 Ofthinking
Analyze the three cases from "Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues" by Vincent Ryan Ruggiero, focusing on identifying the parties involved, the moral issues at stake, and the moral virtues relevant to each case. The analysis should be approximately 250 words in total, with each case equally divided into about 83 words. Use only this source, and ensure your discussion highlights the virtues that are relevant to ethical decision-making in each situation.
Paper For Above instruction
In this analysis, three cases from Ruggiero's "Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues" are examined to identify the moral parties, issues, and virtues at stake. Each case presents unique ethical dilemmas requiring a focus on different moral virtues to guide appropriate responses.
Case 23 (p. 121): This case involves a conflict where a professional must decide whether to prioritize honesty versus loyalty. The parties include the professional, clients or colleagues, and the organization. The moral issue revolves around the virtue of honesty versus loyalty. Honesty demands transparency and truthfulness, while loyalty emphasizes allegiance to colleagues or the organization. The virtuous approach balances these virtues, advocating for honesty tempered by loyalty, ensuring trustworthiness without sacrificing commitment to others. Virtue ethics guides the professional to cultivate integrity, fostering trustworthiness that benefits all parties involved.
Case 9 (pp. 130-131): This case discusses the responsibility of individuals in situations where they must act ethically despite pressures to conform or remain silent. The involved parties are the individual, colleagues, and potential victims of unethical practices. The central moral issue concerns moral courage and integrity—standing up for what is right despite risks. The relevant virtues include courage, integrity, and fairness. Cultivating moral courage enables individuals to confront unethical circumstances, maintaining their integrity and promoting fairness within the organization or community. These virtues reinforce the importance of standing firm in moral convictions for the greater good.
Case 10b (p. 95): The case highlights a scenario where a decision impacts stakeholders' well-being, calling for a moral assessment rooted in compassion and responsibility. The main parties are the decision-maker and those affected by the outcome. The key moral issue involves balancing personal gain against the welfare of others, emphasizing virtues such as compassion, responsibility, and prudence. The virtuous response requires exercising initiative and concern for others' welfare, fostering empathy, and a sense of duty. By embodying these virtues, individuals contribute to ethical environments and promote societal well-being, demonstrating moral responsibility and compassion in decision-making.
References
- Ruggiero, Vincent Ryan. (2015). Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.