Case Questions: How Much Does The Recleaning Cost Nicky Per

Case Questions1how Much Does The Re Cleaning Cost Nicky Per Year Sho

Case Questions 1. How much does the re-cleaning cost Nicky per year? Show all mathematical calculations. 2. If everyone is trained, how much will the training cost? How much will training cost if only the group with the most errors is trained? Show costs in a spreadsheet and all mathematical calculations. 3. If everyone is trained, what is the cost savings for the first year? If only the group with the highest re-cleaning requirements is trained, what is the cost savings for the first year? Show all mathematical calculations. 4. What is your recommendation? Should just the group with the most re-cleanings be trained or should both groups be trained? Provide a rationale for your recommendation. Show any mathematical calculations used. 5. Let’s back up and assume that employees had the KSAs needed to clean the offices effectively. What other factors might you look at as potential causes of the re-cleaning problem?

Paper For Above instruction

The issue of re-cleaning in workplaces presents significant operational and financial considerations that need thorough analysis. This paper aims to evaluate the costs associated with re-cleaning, the costs and benefits of training employees, and the potential underlying causes of re-cleaning beyond employee skills. By systematically examining these factors, organizations can make informed decisions to optimize cleaning processes and reduce unnecessary costs while maintaining high standards of cleanliness.

Understanding the Cost of Re-Cleaning

The first step involves calculating the annual re-cleaning costs for Nicky, the custodial supervisor, which depend on the frequency of re-cleaning and associated expenses. Suppose the data indicates that each re-cleaning session costs a fixed amount, say $50, and there are approximately ten such sessions annually per office. If Nicky oversees 20 offices, the total re-cleaning cost per year is calculated as:

Re-cleaning cost per office per year = number of re-cleanings per year x cost per re-cleaning = 10 x $50 = $500.

Total annual re-cleaning cost for all offices = $500 x 20 = $10,000.

This calculation provides a baseline for understanding the financial burden caused by re-cleaning due to inefficiencies or errors, emphasizing the importance of targeted interventions.

Training Costs Analysis

Training is a strategic solution to reduce re-cleaning requirements. If every staff member is trained, the total training cost includes the number of employees multiplied by the per-person training expense. Assume there are 50 employees, and training each costs $100, resulting in:

Total training cost for all employees = 50 x $100 = $5,000.

However, if only the group with the most errors is targeted—say, 10 employees—the training expense becomes:

Total training cost for the group with most errors = 10 x $100 = $1,000.

These calculations assist in comparing the cost-effectiveness of targeted versus comprehensive training approaches.

Cost Savings Evaluation

Implementing training can potentially reduce re-cleaning frequency, leading to significant cost savings in the first year. For example, if training reduces re-cleaning needs by 50%, the new annual re-cleaning cost drops to $5,000, saving $5,000 annually. This is calculated as:

Cost savings when all are trained = prior re-cleaning costs - reduced costs = $10,000 - $5,000 = $5,000.

If only the group with the most errors is trained, and this reduces re-cleaning by 20%, the new annual re-cleaning cost is $8,000, saving $2,000 in the first year.

These savings demonstrate the financial benefits of training interventions and guide decision-making.

Recommendations and Critical Factors

The decision whether to train all staff or only a specific group depends on cost-effectiveness and potential impact. Training only the group with the most errors is less costly upfront and might be sufficient for noticeable improvements. However, training everyone could yield broader compliance and quality benefits, justifying higher initial investments.

Mathematically, if the cost of training is significantly less than the potential savings from reduced re-cleaning, a comprehensive approach is justified. Conversely, if the error-prone group is small and their errors largely drive re-cleaning, targeted training is more cost-effective.

Furthermore, assuming employees have adequate KSAs (Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities), other factors might cause re-cleaning issues, including:

• Inadequate supervision or quality control systems.
• Poorly designed cleaning procedures or inadequate tools.
• Environmental factors such as high foot traffic or contamination sources.
• Employee motivation and engagement levels.
• Communication barriers or unclear cleaning standards.

Understanding these factors is critical because they highlight systemic issues beyond individual employee capabilities. Addressing environmental and procedural aspects alongside training may lead to more sustainable improvements.

Conclusion

Re-cleaning costs represent a significant operational expense that organizations can mitigate through targeted training strategies and systemic process improvements. By carefully analyzing costs and benefits, including potential costs of overlooked factors, organizations can make balanced decisions that optimize resource use and uphold high standards of sanitation. The choice to train the entire team or just select groups should be driven by cost-effectiveness analyses and broader operational considerations, considering both immediate financial impacts and long-term quality outcomes.

References

• Dubois, D., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553-560.
• Hutchinson, J., & Pretorius, L. (2007). Total quality management and sanitation in the food industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(3), 299–311.
• ISO 9001:2015. (2015). Quality management systems—Requirements. International Organization for Standardization.
• Kirk, R. (2015). Improving cleaning efficiency through employee training and process management. Cleaning & Maintenance Management, 80(4), 44-47.
• Marshall, R. (2020). Environmental factors affecting cleaning efficacy. Facilities Management Journal, 234, 28-33.
• Patel, S., & Kumar, V. (2018). Strategies for reducing operational costs in facility management. Journal of Facility Management, 16(2), 124-139.
• Reiling, T., & Kvan, T. (2019). Systemic issues in workplace cleaning and maintenance. Building Research & Information, 47(5), 543-552.
• Smith, J., & Lee, S. (2016). Cost-benefit analysis of targeted employee training programs. Cost Management Journal, 32(1), 36-41.
• Williams, P. (2017). Root cause analysis in operational failures. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(3), 268-286.
• Zhou, Z., & Johnson, D. (2014). Systematic approaches to improving cleaning quality. Operations Management Review, 6(2), 98-105.