Case Study 13: Mabe Learning To Be A Multinational Aprofesso

Case Study 13 Mabe Learning To Be A Multinational Aprofessor Alfon

Case Study 13 Mabe Learning to Be A Multinational (A) Professor Alfonso Lovo Maria Rovillard Isabel Marcano Michelle Jules Ricardo Hernandez Josdalis Hernandez Kaan Ozgorkey Introduction The company we are analyzing is Mabe, which began manufacturing cabinets and expanded to developing kitchen appliances. Mabe began the internationalization process by manufacturing appliance in Mexico and exporting them to the United States, this was the first step in globalizing the brand. After three decades of production, Mabe entered a joint venture with General Electric to gain knowledge and enter new markets. Through acquiring plants and other joint ventures, Mabe became known in North America, Latin America, and Europe. They acquired Fagor operations, a Spanish manufacturer, in Argentina in 1998 and Dako, GE operations in Brazil, in 2002. With these acquisitions they realized that locals with knowledge of the industry were best to lead the foreign operations. One of the biggest aspects of business globalization and expansion is knowing which countries are the best to invest in and which have the most risk. When going through the internationalization process, companies research Brazil, Russia, India, and China, also known as BRIC countries. These countries are very attractive to companies because they are known for having fast growing markets, perfect for companies looking for foreign investments.

With an attractive market and room for profitability, Mabe decided to enter a joint venture in Russia. Key Issues Throughout this case, there were many issues discussed that Mabe encountered. One key issue Mabe faced was having to train U.S. suppliers who were not used to exporting components to developing countries. This was due to the fact that Mabe and GE had their largest manufacturing facility in Mexico. Another problem was when the company expanded to Brazil. By acquiring Bosch and GE operations, they had a difficult time coming together because of all the different cultures. Cultures such as American, German, Brazilian, and Mexican all had to work together. This type of diversity can make it hard on employees to work and cooperate with each other. An issue Mabe faced was the increase of fresh food consumption. This meant less demand for appliances, such as freezers.

Some challenges presented in this case were the mainly focused on the challenges of doing business in Russia. While Russia offers innovation programs and government funding for foreign companies, there are many risks to doing business in Russia. One issue Russia faces is a decreasing population and the deterioration of human capital. Those are not the only issues Mabe faces in Russia, they also face the government of Russia. The Russian government is known for having weak legislature that might make it difficult for companies to do business in Russia. Another issue faced in Russia is the vastness of the country. By having such a large country, religion, language, and sometimes culture can change depending on the region of where you are located. Therefore, Mabe must have an open-mind about how they would approach the diversity of the country. General Environmental Analysis As mentioned previously, a political issue that externally affects Mabe is the political environment of Russia. The case discussed how corruption and bribery play a big part in Russian politics. The government interferes with businesses, the Russian tax system is very complex, and laws are only applied randomly. This type of political environment makes companies not want to invest in Russia because of its instability. Managers feared that corrupt law enforcement and a lack of property rights would make investing in Russia a poor decision. Understanding the political external environment of a foreign country is important for investors and managers to know in order to make the right decisions on where to expand their company. Another issue Mabe externally faces is the social environment of Russia. The decreasing population and low human capital shows the type of social environment Russia has. Whether it’s due to accidents or violence, the population decrease in Russia is greater than countries in Africa. The deterioration of human capital is due to low levels of health and knowledge in Russia. As the text said, “Natural resources cannot on their own replace the value of human capital," which shows how the conditions in Russia might make it unattractive for Mabe to do business there. Another social issue presented to Mabe was how Russians handled business. Russia’s culture is known for being collectivist, paternalist, and sometimes still Communist. The case discussed how Russians distrust outsiders and prefer short-term projects. This becomes a social problem for Mabe because it could be challenging to find Russians who are willing to work with people from other countries or who come from a different culture. Mabe entered the joint venture in Russia because investors believed that Russia would be a “last frontier” for investments. However, when the financial crisis of 2008 began, it was clear that Russia was not the place to invest. Economically, Russia only had one big bank and loans were hard to obtain. The case states “The mortgage market was virtually nonexistent, representing only three per cent of GDP, the lowest of any emerging market.” This lack of economic attractiveness would make companies not want to invest in Russia. There is essentially more economic risk than reward by taking a company to Russia. Russia has only one place to make transactions and investments, they have no mortgage market, and loans cannot be acquired. Whether political, social, or economical, the external issues from Russia became a big influence on how Mabe was going to do business over there. SWOT Analysis (Michelle) SWOT analyses are used to measure a company’s (S) Strengths, (W) Weaknesses, (O) Opportunities, and (T) Threats. The strengths and weaknesses of a company are the internal factors affecting it, while the opportunities and threats are the external factors affecting it. To succeed and maximize profits, companies need to conduct thorough SWOT analyses to convert their external threats into their internal strengths, and their internal weaknesses into their external opportunities. From the case presented in the book, a scrupulous SWOT analysis of Mabe was made, and it goes as follows: STRENGTH: Mabe is aware of the environments that it conducts business in, and adapts itself to that particular environment to succeed. That is a major strength for any multinational firm to possess. There have been so many instances when companies open operations abroad and conduct business in the foreign country like they do business in their domestic countries, without taking into account the difference between the two cultures. Companies who do this usually realize that they are wrong, and then adapt themselves to the foreign country. Mabe happened to experience a similar issue when it went into Brazil with Mexican-Americans. This presented some challenges for them. From those challenges, they learned that “the best people to operate businesses are the locals who know the industry.” As strengths, Mabe also has a strong brand name and a great international strategy. It functions in three continents so far: North America, Latin America, and Europe. Its products are sold and distributed in more than 70 countries around the world. It offers a wide range of products, and holds a great majority of market share in the home appliances industry. Lastly, Mabe partners only with the top multinational companies. It has participated in joint ventures to enter foreign markets and to gain access to advanced technologies, technical advice and raw materials. WEAKNESSES: Just as it is considered a strength for Mabe to rely on joint ventures to enter foreign markets, gain access to advanced technology and technical advice, that can also be considered to be a weakness. It is a weakness in the sense that Mabe does not have enough intellectual property, or innovative skills within its walls to come up with advanced technologies, so it has to engage in joint ventures. It can also be deemed a weakness in the sense that, Mabe partakes in joint ventures because it does not have enough resources or capital to enter foreign markets on larger scales, or on its own. OPPORTUNITIES: From the case, it can be inferred that there are many opportunities that Mabe can take advantage of in the BRIC countries. The BRIC countries are Brazil, where Mabe currently has operations, Russia, where it’s considering ceasing operations, India and China, where it’s considering opening operations. The BRIC countries are expected to overtake the largest industrialized countries in size and in GDP by 2050. With these countries on the brink of economic expansion, Mabe can benefit from their economic development if it starts to do business in them. THREATS: Lastly, the threats that Mabe faces are similar to that of all multinational companies’ threats. Those are tough competition, currency risk, governmental, and environmental policies. Mabe should keep in mind that whenever it enters a foreign market, the risk of competition awaits it; therefore it should be ready to compete. Currency risk is one of the most important threats that Mabe has to hedge against. Currency risk, or exchange rate risk, is the likelihood that the currencies of the countries in which Mabe does business might depreciate or appreciate. For Mabe, there are no problems when currencies depreciate, it is when they appreciate. When those currencies appreciate, Mabe’s products become cheaper in those countries, and operations become more expensive to run. Lastly, there are governmental and environmental policies that can affect Mabe’s foreign sites. Environmental laws are subject to becoming stricter as the world is becoming more environmentally conscious, and if there are no political stability in those countries, governmental laws can hurt foreign businesses. PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-_1.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-_1.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-_1.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-_1.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-_1.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-_1.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-_1.jpg PHOTO-.jpg PHOTO-_1.jpg

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Understanding the complexities and strategic considerations involved in transforming a domestic enterprise into a successful multinational corporation requires analyzing company growth trajectories, cultural integration, market selection, and external environmental influences. Mabe, a prominent home appliances manufacturer, exemplifies the evolution and challenges faced by multinational companies (MNCs) in the globalized economy. Its journey, from domestic manufacturing in Mexico to expansion across North America, Latin America, Europe, and plans to penetrate BRIC countries, illustrates crucial strategic insights relevant to international business practice.

Company Background and Internationalization Strategy

Mabe initially established itself as a local manufacturer of cabinets, then expanded into developing kitchen appliances. Its internationalization process began with exporting appliances from Mexico to the United States, marking an essential step in building its global footprint. The strategic move to form a joint venture with General Electric (GE) further advanced Mabe’s global aspirations, enabling knowledge transfer, technological exchange, and entrance into diverse markets. This partnership permitted Mabe to acquire additional operations in Argentina and Brazil, such as the Fagor and Dako brands, respectively, solidifying its presence in Latin America and Europe.

Market Selection and Entry Modes

The choice of markets, particularly BRIC countries—Brazil, Russia, India, and China—represents a core component of Mabe’s expansion strategy. These countries are characterized by rapidly growing markets and substantial infrastructural development potential, making them attractive targets for investment. Mabe’s decision to enter Russia via joint ventures reflects a cautious approach to market entry, considering political, social, and economic factors unique to each country. The case illustrates that while these markets present opportunities for high growth, they also encompass significant risks, such as political instability, demographic decline, and diverse cultural landscapes.

Challenges of Cultural Diversity and External Risks

A critical challenge faced by Mabe involves managing the cultural diversity within its international operations. The integration issues between American, German, Brazilian, and Mexican cultures in joint ventures highlight the importance of cultural adaptation and local managerial expertise in global expansion. Furthermore, external risks—particularly in Russia—pose substantial threats: political corruption, weak legislative frameworks, demographic decline, and infrastructural deficiencies such as underdeveloped financial markets. These complicate operational stability and investment decisions, necessitating comprehensive risk analysis and adaptive management strategies.

External Environmental Factors

Analyzing Mabe’s external environment reveals significant influences that shape its international strategy. Politically, Russia’s unstable governance, corruption levels, and complex tax system pose challenges, potentially undermining foreign investment. Socially, Russia’s declining population and low levels of human capital diminish the potential pooled benefits from market expansion. Additionally, Russia's collectivist and paternalist culture, combined with possessiveness towards short-term projects, impacts organizational collaboration and project planning.

Economically, Russia’s limited financial infrastructure, exemplified by minimal mortgage markets and scarce loan availability, impairs capital access necessary for expansion. These macroeconomic conditions contribute to a less favorable environment for foreign companies, influencing strategic decisions such as market withdrawal or re-evaluation of investment priorities.

SWOT Analysis and Strategic Implications

Conducting a detailed SWOT analysis underscores Mabe’s strategic posture. Its internal strengths include adaptability to diverse environments, a recognized global brand, and extensive international reach. Its weaknesses relate to reliance on joint ventures which may limit technological innovation and resource independence. External opportunities lie in expanding operations within the burgeoning BRIC markets, leveraging economic growth trajectories. Threats include intense competition, currency fluctuations, and evolving governmental and environmental policies.

Strategically, Mabe must capitalize on its strengths—such as its flexible adaptation capabilities and strong brand presence—while mitigating weaknesses by investing in proprietary technology and innovation to reduce dependency on partnerships. Additionally, expansion into India and China should be conducted with an emphasis on understanding local consumer behaviors and regulatory landscapes.

Risk Management and Future Outlook

To navigate the multifaceted risks associated with international expansion, Mabe should implement dynamic risk management strategies. These could include hedging currency risks, engaging in politically sensitive market intelligence, and building resilient supply chain networks. Furthermore, fostering local managerial talent can aid in cultural integration and operational efficiency.

The future outlook for Mabe hinges on its ability to balance aggressive expansion with strategic risk mitigation. The company must adapt continuously to geopolitical shifts, infrastructural developments, and changing consumer preferences globally. By doing so, Mabe can sustain its growth momentum and tighten its competitive position in the global appliance market.

References

• Calof, J., & Beamish, P. W. (1995). Adapting to foreign markets: Not just for large firms. International Business Review, 4(2), 115-131.
• Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137-147.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2017). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization. Cengage Learning.
• Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press.
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A latent class approach to multinationality: An exploratory study. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), 349-371.
• Vaaler, P. M., & Schimper, H. (2001). Normative and strategic values of corporate social responsibility for multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 397-414.
• Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341-363.
• Yip, G. S. (1989). Global strategy... In a world of nations? Sloan Management Review, 31(1), 29-41.
• Sonawalla, M., et al. (2011). Cultural Challenges in International Business Expansion. Business Horizons, 54(2), 195-205.