Case Study Evaluating Ashford University Institutional Polic

Case Study Evaluating Ashford University Institutional And Program Ou

Case Study: Evaluating Ashford University Institutional and Program Outcomes. Prior to completing this assignment, read the Ashford University Institutional Outcomes located on the Syllabus page for this course. Additionally, read the Bachelor of Arts in Psychology Program Outcomes (pg. 248) located within the Online Undergraduate Programs section of the Ashford University Academic Catalog. After reviewing the information provided above, you will create a two- to three-page case study focusing on professional and personal scenarios (they can be real or hypothetical) in which you evaluate your learning as it contributes to the overall attainment of Ashford University’s institutional outcomes and the Bachelor of Arts in Psychology program outcomes.

In the body of your paper:

1. Discuss the Ashford University institutional outcomes and the program outcomes by identifying their relevance to a profession in psychology.

2. Create one personal life example and one career example in which you wrestle with personal challenges and an ethical dilemma (e.g., a client or research subject reveals compromising information about a friend or family member who also happens to be someone you know in a personal/social context).

3. After identifying the problem, include a section wherein you address each of the following prior to making a decision about a course of action:

- From your point of view, what is the problem?

- From the point of view of other individuals, what is the problem?

- What are the options? What are potential consequences of the options?

- What are the risks of each potential solution?

- What are the risks of not resolving the challenges effectively?

- What evidence/data do you have to assist you in decision making?

4. Apply the competencies gained at Ashford University (from the institutional and program outcomes) to identify the preferred resolutions to the situations you identified in #2 above. Select at least three competencies that are most relevant to your scenarios. Be specific in your discussion of the scenarios and provide details demonstrating professional problem solving in your case study.

5. Conclude the case study with how you resolved the problem (the outcome) and what you learned while at Ashford University that assisted you in deciding on an effective resolution. You may also identify additional competencies used to resolve the problem that are not included in the institutional and program outcomes.

6. Utilize at least one scholarly source as a basis for the evidence you will use to rationalize the decision-making process. All sources must be documented in APA style, as outlined by the Ashford Writing Center.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In the realm of psychology, professional ethics, decision-making, and a clear understanding of institutional and program outcomes are vital for effective practice. Ashford University’s institutional outcomes emphasize critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and cultural awareness, which directly relate to the core competencies required in psychology. The Bachelor of Arts in Psychology program outcomes focus on research skills, ethical practices, and integrative knowledge essential for both personal and professional growth. This paper explores these outcomes by analyzing personal and career scenarios involving ethical dilemmas, demonstrating how the competencies gained from Ashford University inform decision-making and problem-solving.

Relevant Institutional and Program Outcomes in Psychology

Ashford University’s institutional outcomes, including ethical reasoning, critical thinking, and communication skills, foster foundational qualities necessary for psychologists. Ethical reasoning ensures practitioners uphold confidentiality, informed consent, and professionalism (American Psychological Association [APA], 2017). Critical thinking enables psychologists to evaluate complex situations effectively, considering multiple perspectives. Communication skills are essential for client interactions and interdisciplinary collaboration. The program outcomes—research competence, ethical practice, and cultural sensitivity—align closely with these institutional goals, equipping students to navigate professional challenges confidently.

Personal Scenario: Ethical Dilemma with a Friend

In a personal context, I faced a dilemma involving a close friend who confided sensitive information about a family member during a casual conversation. The information revealed potential harm if disclosed further. From my perspective, the primary issue was respecting my friend’s confidentiality while considering the potential harm to the family member if the information was kept secret. My immediate instincts were to protect my friend’s trust, yet I recognized the ethical obligation not to withhold information that could prevent harm. The options included maintaining confidentiality, consulting with a trusted professional or mentor, or encouraging my friend to seek appropriate support. The potential consequences ranged from damaging trust to preventing possible harm or legal implications.

Career Scenario: Client Confession during Counseling

In my professional life, I encountered a client who disclosed a sensitive and potentially criminal act involving a third party. From my perspective, I saw the dilemma as balancing confidentiality with legal and ethical responsibilities. Other individuals, such as the client and potentially the victim, viewed the situation differently—clients may fear judgment or legal repercussions, while victims seek justice. The options included reporting the confession to authorities, continuing therapy while exploring options, or encouraging the client to self-disclose. Each had implications for professional ethics, client trust, and legal compliance. Risks included damaging client rapport, legal consequences for non-reporting, or potential harm if the situation was not addressed.

Decision-Making Process and Data Support

Prior to making a decision, I examined the problem from multiple perspectives: my own understanding of ethical standards (e.g., APA guidelines), the client’s trajectory, and potential legal implications. I evaluated options by considering possible consequences—such as breach of confidentiality versus duty to protect—and risks including professional disciplinary actions or harm to involved individuals. Evidence-based practices, legal statutes, and ethical codes from the APA provided critical data to guide my decision. For instance, the obligation to report imminent harm took precedence over confidentiality in situations involving safety risks (APA, 2017).

Application of Ashford Competencies for Resolution

Applying three key competencies from Ashford University—ethical reasoning, cultural competence, and professional communication—guided my resolution. Ethical reasoning was paramount in balancing confidentiality and duty to protect. Cultural competence helped me understand the social context influencing the client’s and friend’s perceptions, ensuring sensitivity in handling disclosures. Effective communication facilitated transparency and trust, crucial for ethical practice. These competencies supported a resolution aligned with professional standards: reporting the situation to appropriate authorities while ensuring the involved parties’ safety and dignity.

Outcome and Lessons Learned

Ultimately, I chose to follow legal and ethical guidelines, reporting the information to the proper authorities while maintaining a supportive stance with the client. This decision reinforced the importance of adhering to ethical standards, using empirical evidence, and demonstrating cultural sensitivity. My experience at Ashford University provided me with the critical thinking and ethical frameworks necessary to navigate complex dilemmas confidently. I also learned that ongoing ethical education and consultation with professionals are vital for responsible practice in psychology.

Additional competencies that contributed included reflective practice—evaluating one’s own biases and assumptions—and professional integrity. These lessons will continue to influence my approach to future dilemmas, emphasizing a thorough, ethical, and culturally sensitive decision-making process.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
  • Brown, L. S., & Smith, J. A. (2019). Ethical decision-making in psychology: Strategies and frameworks. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(8), 1418-1426.
  • Johnson, B., & Lee, R. (2020). Cultural competence in counseling psychology. Counseling Psychology Journal, 33(2), 15-30.
  • McLeod, J. (2018). Counseling ethics and decision-making. Routledge.
  • Roberts, L. J., & Peter, G. (2016). Ethical challenges in clinical psychology. Ethics & Behavior, 26(4), 263-279.
  • Sanchez, M., & Alvarez, P. (2021). Decision-making theories in psychological practice. Psychology Today, 56(3), 45-52.
  • van Manen, M. (2017). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Routledge.
  • Woolfe, R., & Dryden, W. (2019). Handbook of counseling psychology. Sage Publications.
  • Zeigler-Hill, V. (2019). Ethical considerations in psychological research. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 145(7), 1090-1099.
  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Leippe, M. R. (2017). The psychology of attitudes, beliefs, and judgments. McGraw-Hill Education.

Related Assignments