Case Study For Southwest Airlines: Completed Case Study

Case Study For Southwest Airlinesthe Completed Case Study Must Include

Case Study For Southwest Airlinesthe Completed Case Study Must Include

CASE STUDY FOR SOUTHWEST AIRLINES The completed case study must include these components, with portions to be submitted over several modules as the Case Study: Matrices Assignment, the Case Study: Historical Financial Analysis Assignment, and the Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Assignment.

· Cover page (must include the company name, your name, the date of submission, and a references page; the document must follow current APA guidelines)

· A total of pages (for all there parts, combined) of narrative text, this does not include the financial statements, reference pages, or matrices

· Reference page (follow current APA guidelines)

· Historical Financial Statements, Proforma Financial Statements, NPV Calculations and a Cost Sheet for the strategy in an Excel document

· Matrices, which must be exhibits/attachments in the appendix and not part of the body of the analysis (The Strategy Club has excellent templates/examples for exhibits and matrices).

You will use the information completed in Case Study: Matrices, and Case Study: Historical Financial Analysis as part of your Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Assignment final document. Be sure to make any corrections to Part One and Part Two based on feedback given on each of the assignments. Your Case Study: Projections, NPV, Compilation Assignment paper must include:

  1. Executive Summary – this should be no more than one page and provide the reader with an overview of what will be contained in the following pages. The problem and strategic solution being recommended should be in this summary.
  2. Details for the choice and implementation and data to support the decision should be contained in the following sections.
  3. Existing mission, objectives, and strategies
  4. A new mission statement (include the number of the component in parenthesis before addressing that component)
  5. Analysis of the firm’s existing business model
  6. SWOT Analysis
  7. TOWS Matrix
  8. Competitive forces analysis
  9. Historical Financial Statements (Income Statement, Balance Sheet, and Statement of Cash Flows) from the 3 most current years for the firm
  10. Historical Ratio Analysis
  11. Competitors Ratio Analysis
  12. Alternative strategies (giving advantages and disadvantages for each). There should be at least two alternative strategies identified and discussed.
  13. Projected Financial Statements (Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows) for 3 years into the future. This must be broken down by year into two (2) columns: 1 column without your strategy and 1 column with your strategy. The without column should serve as the basis for your with strategy column and only those financial statement accounts that will be changed, based on your strategy, should be impacted.
  14. Include Projected ratios for the without and with strategy by year. Discuss how these ratios compare and contrast with the historical findings.
  15. Cost Analysis completed on an Excel tab that outlines the cost that will be incurred to implement the strategy. This information should correspond with the With Strategy on the Projected Financial Statements, linking of cells to the financial statements is encouraged.
  16. Net Present Value analysis of proposed strategy’s new cash flow – you may also use Excel to solve for this. From the income statement the change in operating income between your with and without strategy should serve as your cash inflow for each year. To construct the first cash flow (cf1), the new revenue from your strategy(s) must be discounted back to the present value by calculating EBIT (Operating Income on the Income Statement) and that figure will be your cfn for each year. cf0 (initial cost of your strategy), cf1 (discounted cash flow first year), r (opportunity cost of capital, the rate of the next best alternative use of cash/debt/equity resources).
  17. Implementation strategy – how and when will the strategy be implemented, this should outline the who, how, what, and when of the implementation process.
  18. Specific recommended strategy and long term objectives. Explain why you chose the strategy, discuss the advantages/benefits to organizational success and sustainability. Include a discussion of the challenges or disadvantages that may arise as a result of the strategic choice.
  19. Text must follow this order with current APA level headings for each component.

Paper For Above instruction

Southwest Airlines is renowned for its unique low-cost business model, which has historically differentiated it within the fiercely competitive airline industry. This case study aims to analyze Southwest Airlines' current strategic position, evaluate financial performance, explore alternative strategic options, and propose a financially viable future strategy, employing detailed financial analysis, strategic frameworks such as SWOT and TOWS, and valuation techniques like NPV.

The initial steps involve a comprehensive review of Southwest Airlines’ existing mission, objectives, and strategies, establishing a baseline for future strategic recommendations. The airline’s mission has traditionally emphasized customer affordability, operational efficiency, and unique corporate culture. A proposed new mission statement should reflect contemporary challenges and opportunities, possibly emphasizing innovation in sustainability and digital transformation while maintaining core customer-centric values.

Analyzing the firm's existing business model underscores its focus on short-haul point-to-point routes, high aircraft utilization, and a single aircraft model to minimize costs. This model has allowed Southwest to sustain profitability even amidst industry downturns; however, potential vulnerabilities include dependence on specific market segments and geographical areas. The SWOT analysis reveals strengths such as brand loyalty and operational efficiency, weaknesses like limited international presence, opportunities in expanding ancillary revenues, and threats from rising fuel costs and competitor entry.

The TOWS matrix helps translate SWOT findings into strategic actions, aligning strengths with opportunities and addressing weaknesses with threats. Competitive forces analysis via Porter’s Five Forces indicates intense rivalry, bargaining power of suppliers and customers, and threats from new entrants and substitute modes of transportation, all influencing strategic planning.

Financial analysis covering the last three years highlights consistent revenue growth, solid profit margins, and liquidity ratios, contrasted with increasing fuel costs impacting profit margins. Ratio analysis extends to competitors, providing benchmarks against industry leaders like Delta and American Airlines, and identifies areas for strategic improvement.

Alternative strategies considered include diversification into international markets and adoption of advanced fuel-efficient aircraft, each with advantages and disadvantages. The strategic framework then transitions into financial projections, where future income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements are developed for three years under both with and without the proposed strategy. These projections emphasize how specific accounts will change due to strategic initiatives, such as increased revenue from expanded routes or cost reductions through fuel efficiencies.

Projected ratios such as ROI, ROA, and debt-to-equity ratios will be compared year-over-year to assess financial health and sustainability, highlighting whether the strategy enhances performance relative to historical trends. Cost analysis in Excel captures the incremental costs associated with strategy implementation, integrated with projected financials to ensure consistency.

The NPV calculation evaluates the financial viability of the proposed strategy, discounting future cash flows against the opportunity cost of capital. This analysis indicates whether the strategic investment is expected to generate value, guiding decision-making.

Implementation plans specify timeline, responsible parties, resource allocation, and risk management considerations, essential for translating strategy into action. The final section articulates the recommended long-term strategic direction, emphasizing organizational success, sustainability, and competitive positioning, while acknowledging potential challenges such as market volatility and operational risks.

References

  • Chen, M. (2021). Strategic airline management: frameworks and case studies. Journal of Air Transport Management, 93, 102032.
  • Gittell, J. H. (2016). Transforming relationships for high performance: The power of relational coordination. Stanford University Press.
  • O'Connell, J. F., & Williams, G. (2016). Air Transport in the 21st Century: Risks and Opportunities. Routledge.
  • Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93.
  • Southwest Airlines. (2020). Annual report. Retrieved from https://www.southwest.com
  • Thompson, A. A., Peteraf, M. A., Gamble, J. E., & Strickland, A. J. (2022). Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Wensveen, J. G. (2018). Air Transportation: A Management Perspective. Ashgate Publishing.
  • Zhang, A., & Zhang, J. (2019). Financial performance analysis of airlines based on ratio analysis: A comparative study. Journal of Air Transport Management, 76, 97–106.
  • Williams, G., & O'Connell, J. F. (2019). Airline finance and management. Routledge.
  • Naude, P., & Webb, G. (2018). Strategic aviation management. Routledge.

Related Assignments