Case Study: Interview Your Digital Patient Tina Jones

Case Studyinterview Your Digital Patient Tina Jones Within Shadow He

Case Studyinterview Your Digital Patient Tina Jones Within Shadow Health. Document her comprehensive health history. Make sure to document pertinent abnormal and normal findings. · Click on the Shadow Health link in the Shadow Health module to find and access the Health History assignment. · This assignment will take you approximately 85-105 minutes to complete. · In order to use the voice-to-text functionality in Shadow Health (not required) you will need to use the latest Chrome web browser. · You are welcome to revisit your Shadow Health assignment as many times as you like up until the assignment due date deadline; to leave the assignment open, do not click on "Submit" until you are satisfied with your performance. · If you accidentally submit your assignment and would like to revisit it, contact the Shadow Health support team (see below). The assignment cannot be reopened after the assignment due date. · Complete self-reflection for this assignment help prompts to help you think more deeply about your performance in the assignment. Reflective writing develops your clinical reasoning skills as you grow and improve as a clinician, and gives your instructor insight into your learning process. The more detail and depth you provide in your responses, the more you will benefit from this activity. · For this assignment, even though your activity and responses will be recorded in Shadow Health, in Canvas Select the "Start Entry" option below, type the word "Confirmed," click "Save" and then "Submit" to complete the assignment. · You will not be able to access this assignment until you have completed the orientation located in the Presentations folder for this week. Please make sure to review the assignment rubric. Position work A position work is a document you could present to a legislator to seek support for an issue you endorse. Present your position on a current health-care issue in a one-page work, following the assignment guidelines below. You can select your issue topic from newspapers, national news magazine articles, professional journals, or professional association literature. Your position work should: · Be quickly and easily understood. · Be succinct and clear. · Appear very professional with the legislator’s name and title on top and your name and your credentials at the bottom. · Condense essential information in one, single-spaced page, excluding the title and reference list pages as hinted at . · Be written using correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, syntax, and APA format. · Clearly describe the issue that you are addressing in the opening paragraph. · Include 3–4 bullet points regarding why you are seeking the legislator’s vote, support, or opposition. Bullet points should be clear and concise but not repetitive and should reflect current literature that substantiates your position and use case study help. · Summarize the implications for the nursing profession and/or patients. · Conclude with two recommendations that you wish to see happen related to your issue, such as a vote for or against, a change in policy, or the introduction of new legislation. · Use current APA Style, correct grammar, and references as appropriate. The literature you cite must be from peer-reviewed journals and primary source information. · · · Principles of management .. · Address the following discussion question, Pg. 166, Discussion Topic #1. It begins: “A company that makes and sells EPA-certified…†· The expectation is that you will be able to do a thorough analysis of the issues and values involved and explain why you would take the approach you decided is appropriate answers at free resources . Part of a thorough analysis is to acknowledge opposing ideas. Provide concrete examples. Be sure to read the General Discussion Posts on Addressing Issues of Ethics and Values. A company that makes and sells EPA-certified pesticides in the United States has received an inquiry from a farm supply distributor in another country. This distributor is interested in buying pesticides that have been banned in the United States but not in the other country. The U.S. company has the capability of manufacturing and packaging the banned pesticide. Is it moral for the company to produce and sell this banned pesticide to the distributor in the other country? A. Yes. B. No.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Title: Ethical Implications of International Pesticide Sales: A Moral Dilemma for U.S. Companies

Introduction

In an increasingly interconnected world, the ethical considerations surrounding the manufacturing and sale of chemical products such as pesticides have gained prominence. U.S.-based pesticide companies face complex decisions when approached by international distributors interested in importing substances banned domestically but permitted elsewhere. This paper critically analyzes the moral implications of producing and selling EPA-banned pesticides to foreign markets, considering legal, ethical, and societal dimensions.

Issue Description

The core issue involves a U.S. company with the capacity to produce and package pesticides that are banned in the United States due to health and environmental concerns. An international farm supply distributor, operating in a country where the pesticide remains legal, requests to purchase these products. The company must decide whether it is morally justifiable to fulfill this demand, despite domestic bans.

Analysis of Ethical Principles

The debate hinges on several ethical principles, including beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. Producing and selling the pesticide may generate economic benefits and satisfy international demand; however, it raises concerns regarding harm, environmental degradation, and the company's social responsibility. Ethical frameworks such as utilitarianism suggest weighing overall benefits against harms, while deontological perspectives emphasize adherence to moral duties and regulations.

Opposing Views and Concrete Examples

Proponents argue that as long as the pesticide complies with the legal requirements of the importing country, the sale is permissible and supports global food security and agricultural productivity. For example, some argue that banning substances domestically does not imply they are universally unsafe, citing regional differences in environmental regulations. Conversely, opponents contend that exporting banned pesticides perpetuates environmental harm and endangers vulnerable populations, as evidenced by case studies linking pesticide exposure to health issues in farming communities.

Evaluation of Moral Appropriateness

Considering ethical principles and empirical evidence, most ethicists and regulatory bodies advocate that companies should refrain from producing and exporting substances banned in their home countries. This stance aligns with the precautionary principle, emphasizing the prevention of harm. Commercial interests should not override duties to protect public health and the environment, especially given the potential for misuse or improper regulation in importing countries.

Implications for Nursing and Society

While primarily a corporate ethical issue, the sale of hazardous pesticides has wider societal implications, including increased health risks for farmworkers and communities exposed to toxic chemicals. Nurses and healthcare professionals play a vital role in addressing health consequences arising from pesticide exposure, emphasizing the need for preventive policies and ethical corporate practices.

Recommendations

  • Implement a global standard that discourages the export of banned substances, promoting international cooperation for environmental and health safety.
  • Encourage multinational companies to adopt corporate social responsibility policies that prohibit the export of products banned domestically, aligning profit motives with ethical obligations.

Conclusion

Offering pesticides banned in the United States to foreign markets presents significant moral challenges rooted in environmental stewardship and social responsibility. A cautious, ethically grounded approach advocates for prohibiting such exports, prioritizing public health and ecological integrity over short-term profit. Future policies should reinforce global consensus standards, fostering a morally responsible stance in international chemical trade.

References

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goklany, I. M. (2007). Environmental Values and International Trade: Ethical and Practical Considerations. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(4), 369-377.
  • International Labour Organization. (2013). Protecting Farm Workers from Pesticide Risks. ILO Publications.
  • Perkins, S. E., & Thorlakson, T. (2019). Corporate Responsibility in Global Agriculture. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 821-837.
  • Thompson, J. (2014). Ethical Dimensions of Pesticide Use: A Global Perspective. Environmental Ethics, 36(2), 125-144.
  • United Nations Environment Programme. (2016). The Global Pesticide Problem. UNEP Reports.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Pesticide Regulations and Policies. EPA.gov.
  • World Health Organization. (2010). Pesticide Exposure and Human Health. WHO Publications.
  • Zumwalde, M., et al. (2017). Exporting Banned Pesticides: Ethical Dilemmas and Policy Responses. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(2), 124-137.
  • Zimmerman, M. (2018). Ethical Commerce and Environmental Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(1), 15-34.

Related Assignments