Chapter 2 Literature Review: Begin Writing Here Checklist

Chapter 2 Literature Reviewbegin Writing Herechecklistbegin With Th

Begin writing here… Checklist: Begin with the first sentence of the purpose statement and problem statement that leads to a brief explanation of the organization of the literature review. Do not simply cut and paste the Purpose Statement section from Chapter 1. Provide an overview of the sub-headings in the literature that will be discussed. At the end of this section, indicate the databases accessed and the search engines used. Discuss all the search parameters, including the search terms and their combinations (with more detailed search terms located in an appendix, if appropriate), range of years, and types of literature.

Devote approximately 30 to 60 pages to this chapter to include citations to at least 50 relevant sources. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework Begin writing here… Checklist: Describe the guiding theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, including the definitions of all the concepts, an explanation of the relationships among the concepts, and a presentation of all the assumptions and propositions. Explain the origin and development of the framework. Demonstrate detailed knowledge of and familiarity with both the historical and the current literature on the framework. Identify existing research studies that used this framework in a similar way.

Mention alternative frameworks, with a justification of why the selected framework was chosen. Describe how and why the selected framework relates to the present study and how it guided the development of the problem statement, purpose statement, and research questions. Subtopic Begin writing here…

Level 3 Heading Text

Level 4 Heading. Text

Checklist: Critically analyze (i.e., note the strengths and weaknesses) and synthesize (i.e., integrate) the existing research. Rather than reporting on each study independently, describe everything known on the topic by reviewing the entire body of work. Present a balanced integrative critical review of the literature, ensuring all points of view are included. Cover all the important issues with a discussion of areas of convergence (i.e., agreement) and divergence (i.e., disagreement). Provide potential explanations for areas of divergence.

Address issues of authority, audience, and/or bias/point of view in the sources used. Summary Begin writing here…

Checklist

Briefly restate the key points discussed in the chapter. Review the headings and/or table of contents to ensure all key points are covered. Highlight areas of convergence and divergence as well as gaps in the literature that support the need for the study. This discussion should logically lead to Chapter 3, where the research methodology and design will be discussed.

Paper For Above instruction

The literature review serves as a foundational component of scholarly research, providing context, highlighting gaps, and framing the significance of the current study. This chapter systematically explores existing research, theories, and frameworks relevant to the research problem, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the field and justifying the need for the present investigation.

The purpose of this literature review is to synthesize current knowledge on [insert topic], establish the theoretical or conceptual grounding for the study, and identify gaps or inconsistencies that warrant further inquiry. To achieve this, the review begins with an introduction of the problem statement and its significance, outlining how the review is organized into sub-sections. These sections include an overview of the key themes, followed by an examination of the methodological approaches employed in previous studies. Particular attention is given to the theoretical or conceptual frameworks that underpin these investigations, with a focus on how they have guided research design and interpretation of results.

In conducting this review, a deliberate search strategy was employed to ensure comprehensive coverage of the literature. Databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were accessed, with search engines and Boolean operators used to refine results. The search parameters included keywords such as "[keyword1]," "[keyword2]," and "[keyword3]," combined with filters for peer-reviewed articles published within the last [number] years. An appendix provides a detailed account of the search terms, combinations, and inclusion criteria. The scope of the literature encompasses empirical studies, theoretical articles, and critical reviews relevant to [topic], facilitating a robust synthesis of knowledge.

Central to this chapter is the articulation of the guiding theoretical or conceptual framework. This framework provides the lens through which the research problem is understood, shaping hypotheses, research questions, and methodology. For instance, if Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory is employed, definitions of key constructs such as self-efficacy and observational learning are clarified, along with their interrelationships. The historical evolution of this framework is traced from foundational works to contemporary applications, illustrating its relevance and adaptability. Alternative frameworks are also discussed, with rationale provided for the choice of the primary framework based on its alignment with research objectives and its empirical support.

Reviewing the existing literature reveals both consensus and contention among scholars. While many studies agree on the importance of [specific aspect], discrepancies emerge regarding the magnitude of effects, contextual variables, or methodological approaches. For example, some researchers emphasize the role of [variable], whereas others suggest its influence is moderated by [another factor]. These divergences are critically examined, considering elements like sample characteristics, research design, and potential biases. Such analysis highlights areas requiring further exploration, thus justifying the current study’s contribution.

Throughout the review, the authority and credibility of sources are evaluated, considering factors such as peer-review status, journal impact factor, and researcher expertise. Bias and point of view are also scrutinized, especially in industry-funded studies or those with ideological inclinations. This level of critique ensures that the synthesis presents a balanced and nuanced understanding of the literature landscape.

In summation, this chapter synthesizes a broad spectrum of research, integrating findings to depict the current state of knowledge and identifying gaps that inform the current investigation. Key areas of agreement and disagreement are outlined, along with an assessment of methodological strengths and weaknesses. The review's culmination points to the necessity of further research, particularly studies that address [specific gaps], which will be undertaken in the subsequent methodology chapter.

References

• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage publications.
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Rothman, K. J. (2012). Epidemiology: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
• Sandberg, J. (2014). How should we justify knowledge produced for practice? Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(2), 170-189.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
• Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.