Chapter 4 Reword Discussion Questions: Many Believe That Tru

Chapter 4 Reworddiscussion Questions1many Believe That Truly Addressi

Chapter 4 Reworddiscussion Questions1many Believe That Truly Addressi

Many believe that truly addressing inequities in the food system requires going beyond food to address inequities in society. Yet, those social inequities are difficult to change for many reasons. Where would you focus your energy? Answer: I will focus my energy more on food equities because the nature of the food system—from agricultural production through retailing and consumption to trade—contributes to food insecurity and inequities in diet-related health. The food system is also a major contributor to climate change and is increasingly affected by it, resulting in reduced quantity and affordability of food in many countries. This contribution is predicted to increase and to cause disproportionate harm to vulnerable populations.

Discussion Question 2

The authors note that in some cases their discussion of how our food system affects inequalities is speculative (particularly due to a lack of evidence on pathways from broad national and international food systems forces to health inequalities). Do you agree? Why and why not? Answer: I agree with the speculations because the text demonstrates how the food system and its components are key loci and contributors to explaining health disparities. The products and externalized costs of our food production system are unequally distributed across society, influenced by supply, demand, and social and economic factors. The determinants of disparities act like a prism, refracting the elements of our food system and making them differentially available, accessible, and preferred by various sectors of society. The UN defines food security as a situation where “all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.”

Discussion Question 3

Julie Guthman’s piece, “Foodies on a Mission,” is provocative. What do you think of her view of a civilizing mission in the alternative-food movement? Answer: I believe her mission is a positive one aimed at changing people’s eating habits by educating them on healthy food choices rather than consuming junk food thoughtlessly. This issue is especially common among marginalized communities, where individuals often eat whatever is available without regard to nutritional value, food origins, or preservation methods, assuming that the presence of food in local stores indicates its safety or quality. The civilizing mission of the alternative-food movement would help open people’s eyes to what constitutes good nutrition and promote healthier eating practices. Being a 'mission,' it should be aspirational and inspiring, encouraging emulation rather than imposing attitudes on others.

Discussion Question 4

Patricia Allen states, “Although local food movements cannot be held responsible for rectifying injustices of the past, neither is it clear how physical geography is a defensible arbiter for boundaries of caring, action, or understanding.” Do you think we should have some special responsibility to those who are more local to us? Answer: Yes, I believe we should have some special responsibility to those in our immediate community because when individuals are assigned specific responsibilities, local food movements can be better managed, and communities are motivated to feed themselves effectively. Local responsibility fosters a sense of shared accountability and community resilience, encouraging sustainable and equitable food practices that directly benefit the locality.

Discussion Question 5

The chapter authors suggest that in the medium to long term, environmental threats to the food system might make healthy and sustainable choices more affordable. Do you agree or disagree? Answer: I fully agree. Over time, environmental challenges such as climate change and resource scarcity may incentivize innovations and policy shifts that lower the costs of sustainable and healthy foods, making them more accessible and affordable. For example, sustainable agriculture practices could reduce input costs and environmental impacts, which in turn could decrease prices, encouraging healthier consumption patterns that are also environmentally responsible.

References

  • FAO. (2008). An introduction to the basic issues of food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
  • Guthman, J. (2011). Foodies on a Mission: Exploring the Civilizing Mission in Alternative Food Movements. Gastronomica: The Journal of Food and Culture.
  • Patel, R. (2007). Stuffed and Starved: The Hidden Battle for the World Food System. Melville House Publishing.
  • Permaculture Research Institute. (2018). Local food movements and sustainability. Permaculture Magazine.
  • Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press.
  • Schlosser, E. (2001). Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Velasquez, M., & Strife, S. (2014). Food justice and food sovereignty. Geoforum, 54, 137–144.
  • World Health Organization. (2003). Food Safety and Food Security in a Globalized World. WHO Press.
  • Wilde, P., et al. (2017). Food insecurity, climate change, and health: a review. Environmental Health Perspectives.
  • Winson, A. (2004). Making the Local: Ethical Foodscapes of Voluntary, Organic, and Local Food Networks in Vancouver. Canadian Journal of Sociology.