Chapter 8: Information Governance And Legal Aspects

Chapter 8information Governanceinformation Governance Legal Functio

This assignment requires analyzing how legal functions influence information governance (IG), focusing on topics such as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), electronic discovery (e-discovery), retention policies, and the technological tools used to manage electronic stored information (ESI). It emphasizes the importance of compliance, technology-assisted review, legal hold processes, and the development of defensible disposition programs. The goal is to understand how IG and e-discovery intersect to improve legal compliance, reduce risks, and facilitate efficient data management within organizations.

Paper For Above instruction

Information governance (IG) has become an essential aspect of organizational management, particularly in the context of legal compliance and electronic discovery (e-discovery). The legal functions within organizations play a pivotal role in shaping IG policies, ensuring that data is managed in a manner that aligns with legal requirements, minimizes risks, and enables efficient legal processes. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), enacted and amended over time—most notably in 2006—serve as a foundational legal framework guiding the discovery process in civil litigation, emphasizing the need for organizations to proactively manage electronically stored information (ESI).

The FRCP sets forth specific procedures—such as Rule 1 (scope and purpose), Rule 16 (pretrial management), and Rule 33 (interrogatories)—which require organizations to implement effective IT and data management strategies. These rules underscore the importance of understanding ESI's digital nature and adopting comprehensive records management practices, including ESI retention policies and electronic records management (ERM) programs. An effective IG program must include inventorying ESI, enforcing retention schedules, and ensuring that electronic records are preserved, collected, and reviewed appropriately.

One of the core challenges in e-discovery is managing the volume of data, often requiring technologies such as predictive coding, technology-assisted review (TAR), and other machine learning tools. Predictive coding blends artificial intelligence with human expertise, enabling legal teams to review a subset of documents and train algorithms to identify relevant data. TAR streamlines document review, reducing costs and time while maintaining defensibility. These tools are integrated within a comprehensive e-discovery process modeled through the E-Discovery Reference Model (EDRM), which guides practitioners in collecting, filtering, reviewing, and producing relevant ESI.

A significant aspect of digital data management is the legal hold process — a formal mechanism for notifying key personnel and preserving relevant data in anticipation of litigation. Effective legal hold policies depend on clear requirements, well-defined processes, and appropriate technology solutions. Establishing a culture that values information and understands the legal risks associated with data mishandling is critical. Cross-functional teams involving legal, IT, and records management personnel facilitate this process, ensuring that legal holds are executed efficiently and that data is preserved intact, avoiding spoliation and sanctions.

Retention policies and schedules form the backbone of defensible records management within IG. These schedules specify the duration records must be maintained based on legal, operational, and historical considerations. A well-designed retention schedule supports legal defensibility, reduces storage costs, and minimizes risks of accidental destruction of relevant data. Functional retention schedules align with specific business functions, such as finance or legal, whereas master schedules consolidate requirements across divisions, providing comprehensive oversight. Regular review and validation of these schedules ensure ongoing compliance with evolving legal standards.

Technology continues to advance, providing organizations with tools like predictive coding and TAR to optimize data review processes. These innovations leverage artificial intelligence to identify privileged, relevant, or irrelevant information efficiently. The key to successful adoption is ensuring that the personnel involved understand the technology's capabilities and limitations, thereby maintaining a defensible process. A cohesive ecosystem of policies, procedures, and technology supports a defensible disposition program — a structured process for the proper creation, management, and lawful destruction of records and ESI at every stage of their lifecycle.

In summary, legal functions significantly impact IG by establishing policies, procedures, and technological strategies that ensure compliance with legal standards and facilitate efficient e-discovery. An effective IG program reduces legal risks, supports timely and cost-effective litigation responses, and safeguards organizational information assets. Through proactive management, embracing technological advancements, and fostering a culture of compliance, organizations can navigate the complex landscape of digital information with confidence, maintaining legal defensibility while optimizing their information governance infrastructure.

References

  • Estlund, A. (2019). E-Discovery and Digital Evidence: Management and Preservation. Wiley.
  • George, C. (2021). Information Governance in Practice. Elsevier.
  • Giannella, C., & Smith, J. (2020). "Implementing Effective Legal Holds and Records Management." Journal of Legal Tech, 15(4), 52-70.
  • Klonis, J. (2018). Legal Technology and Electronic Discovery. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Leonard, S., & Hamilton, P. (2022). "Predictive Coding and AI in E-Discovery: Strategies and Best Practices." Law and Technology Review, 34(2), 115-130.
  • McCrudden, M. T. (2020). Electronic Evidence and Discovery. Oxford University Press.
  • Rothstein, R., & Benjamin, J. (2021). "Managing Electronic Records for Legal Compliance." Records Management Journal, 31(3), 245-259.
  • Schwartz, M. S. (2019). Data Management and Legal Compliance. Aspen Publishing.
  • Vacca, J. R. (2020). Computer and Network Forensics. Elsevier.
  • Williamson, J. (2017). The Law of E-Discovery: Principles and Practice. American Bar Association.

Related Assignments