Choose A Company Whose Products You Are Familiar With

Choosea Company Whose Products You Are Familiar To Use As The Example

Choose a company whose products you are familiar with to use as the example for this exercise. Design a mock-up survey to gain primary data about your market. Choose the method you will use for your survey (e.g., pamphlet, telemarketing, focus group, internet, etc.). Use four different types of questions and two cross-reference target market characteristics (a total of at least six different question types). If you select a pamphlet or focus group, design it using Microsoft Publisher, Word, or Adobe Photoshop, and attach it as a PDF. If you choose an internet survey, provide the Survey Monkey link or include a copy of the survey. If you opt for telemarketing, prepare a script. Write a 500 to 700-word essay explaining why you selected each question type and its purpose, and why you chose the particular method to gather the information.

Paper For Above instruction

Choosing the appropriate market research method and question types is a crucial step in understanding consumer behavior and preferences about a company's products. For this exercise, I selected Apple Inc., a globally recognized technology company known for its innovative products like the iPhone, iPad, and MacBook. The goal of this survey is to gather primary data that will help understand customer satisfaction, purchasing behavior, and preferences related to Apple’s products. Based on this, I decided to design an online survey using Survey Monkey, a widely used digital tool for conducting market research.

The rationale for choosing Survey Monkey as the method stems from its accessibility, ease of distribution, and capacity to reach a broad audience efficiently. Online surveys facilitate quick data collection and analysis, making them suitable for gathering opinions from a diverse demographic that includes current Apple product users and potential customers. Additionally, the digital format allows for multimedia integration and more complex question types, which enhances engagement and data quality.

In designing the survey, I selected four different types of questions to ensure comprehensive insights. The first type is Likert scale questions, which measure the degree of agreement or satisfaction. For example, “On a scale of 1 to 5, how satisfied are you with the battery life of your Apple device?” This type helps quantify customer satisfaction levels and identify areas for improvement. The second type is multiple-choice questions, such as “Which Apple product do you own or plan to purchase?” This provides categorical data about product ownership and intent.

The third question type is open-ended questions, exemplified by “What features do you wish Apple would improve or add in future versions?” Open-ended questions allow respondents to express detailed opinions, providing nuanced insights that structured questions might miss. The fourth type is rating scale questions, like “How likely are you to recommend Apple products to friends or family?” rated from 0 to 10. This helps measure customer loyalty and advocacy.

In addition to these, I included demographic questions to cross-reference responses with characteristics such as age and income level. For example, “What is your age group?” and “What is your annual household income?” These serve as the cross-reference variables, essential for analyzing how preferences and satisfaction vary across different market segments.

The purpose of these diverse question types is to capture both quantitative data, which enables statistical analysis, and qualitative insights, which provide depth and context. Likert scale and rating questions quantify customer sentiment and loyalty, which are vital for strategic improvement. Multiple-choice questions streamline data collection around product ownership and shopping preferences, enabling segmentation. Open-ended questions provide an opportunity for consumers to voice specific desires and frustrations, uncovering unmet needs or innovative ideas.

I chose the online survey method because it allows for rapid data collection from a broad, geographically dispersed audience, which aligns with Apple’s global market. Moreover, the familiarity and convenience for respondents increase the likelihood of participation and honest responses. The digital environment also supports complex question formats, including matrices and follow-up questions, which enrich data analysis.

In conclusion, selecting a diverse set of question types and an efficient survey method is essential in obtaining comprehensive and actionable market insights. By focusing on Apple’s consumers through an online survey, I aim to capture a nuanced understanding of their experiences, preferences, and demographic influences. This approach ensures the data collected will support strategic planning and targeted marketing efforts for Apple and similar companies.

References

- Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2020). Marketing Research: An Applied Approach. Pearson Education.

- Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2019). Marketing Research. John Wiley & Sons.

- Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Wiley.

- DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.

- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley.

- Churchill, G. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations. Cengage Learning.

- Wang, C., & Zhang, P. (2012). The role of consumers’ perceived value in online shopping: A study of older adults. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(2), 134-142.

- Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2012). Business Research Methods. Cengage Learning.

- McDaniel, C., & Gates, R. (2017). Marketing Research. Wiley.

- Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233.