Choose One Character From The Blind Side Movie To A

Movie The Blind Sidechoose One Character From The Movie To Apply The

Movie: The Blind Side *Choose ONE character from the movie to apply the two chosen theories too. Remember you do not talk about the character in this section. You need a character to decide on theories for section 1. For Section 1 of your course project, you will select two theories of personality presented in this class to examine and analyze and then apply these theories to a film character in Section 2. Do not describe your movie character in Section 1; you will do this in Section 2. Section 1 is only about your examination of two personality theories. Section 1 should be 4–5 pages (excluding the title page and reference list) and include at least four professional references. In order to complete your project, it is necessary for you to determine which two personality theories to apply to the character in your chosen film. Choose two of the following theories explored in this course: Psychodynamic, Phenomenological, Behavioral, Trait, Social-cognitive. In Section 1, address the following areas for each theory: Basic philosophies of the theory. (Describe the main theoretical tenets, view of human nature.) Describe three to four theoretical constructs. Identify limitations and criticisms of the theory. Discuss how this theory complements your own view of personality development.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment at hand involves a comprehensive analysis of two prominent personality theories—namely, the Psychodynamic and Trait theories—and their applicability to a character from the film "The Blind Side." This analysis serves as a foundational exploration to facilitate a deeper understanding of how these theories conceptualize personality development, human behavior, and inherent traits. The initial step encompasses an examination of the core tenets, theoretical constructs, criticisms, and personal relevance of each theory, devoid of any reference to the film character. The subsequent section, to be addressed separately, will entail applying these theoretical frameworks to a specific character from the movie, illustrating their practical relevance and explanatory power.

Psychodynamic Theory

The psychodynamic perspective, rooted in the pioneering work of Sigmund Freud, emphasizes the influence of unconscious processes, early childhood experiences, and internal conflicts in shaping personality. Freud's model posits that human personality comprises three structures: the id, ego, and superego, each representing different aspects of our psyche and often in conflict. This theory suggests that childhood experiences are pivotal in forming personality traits and behaviors; unresolved conflicts can manifest as psychological disturbances later in life. The psychodynamic approach underscores the importance of defense mechanisms, such as repression and projection, in managing internal conflict and anxiety.

Three significant constructs within this theory include the role of unconscious motives, the impact of early developmental stages (oral, anal, phallic, latency, genital), and the influence of defense mechanisms on behavior. These constructs help explain personality stability over time and provide insight into underlying psychological processes that are often hidden from conscious awareness.

However, the psychodynamic theory faces criticism for its heavy reliance on case studies, which limit generalizability, and its perceived lack of scientific rigor. Critics argue that concepts like the unconscious and defense mechanisms are difficult to measure objectively, leading to concerns over empirical validation. Additionally, some contend that the theory overemphasizes childhood experiences, neglecting the ongoing influence of social and environmental factors.

Despite these criticisms, many aspects of the psychodynamic theory resonate with my view of personality development, particularly the idea that early experiences and unconscious motives significantly shape behavior. It highlights the complex interplay of internal conflicts and societal influences, encouraging a nuanced understanding of individual differences.

Trait Theory

The trait theory posits that personality consists of enduring characteristics or traits that are relatively stable over time and across different situations. This approach focuses on identifying, measuring, and ranking these traits to understand personality variations among individuals. Traits are viewed as biological or learned predispositions that influence behavior, emotions, and thoughts.

Key constructs of the trait theory include the Big Five personality dimensions—Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism—each representing spectrum-like traits that collectively describe human personality. These dimensions provide a comprehensive framework for understanding individual differences and predicting behavior across contexts.

The trait perspective has been criticized for its descriptive nature, often lacking explanatory mechanisms for how traits develop. Critics also argue that it may overlook the influence of situational and environmental factors on behavior. Nonetheless, the trait theory's emphasis on stability and measurement has contributed significantly to personality psychology and practical applications such as personnel selection and counseling.

Personally, I find the trait theory aligns with my view that personality traits are fundamental in shaping consistent behavior patterns. It offers a measurable and scientific approach to understanding individual differences, emphasizing the importance of biological predispositions and environmental interactions in personality development.

References

• Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt.
• Freud, S. (1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. Liveright.
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). Guilford Press.
• Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Houghton Mifflin.
• Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Transaction Publishers.
• Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224-239). Guilford Press.
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21-50.
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior. Springer-Verlag.
• Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2006). A comparison of the NEO-PI-R and the Five-Factor Inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 451-460.
• McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217.