Cjus 310 Research Paper Final Rubric Student Name Criteria P
Cjus 310research Paper Final Rubricstudent Namecriteriapoints Possib
Cjus 310 Research Paper: Final Rubric Student Name: Criteria Points Possible a. Organization . Did the author follow the direction; such as was the paper turned in using the correct link; file named correctly; turned in on time; etc. 2. Is the paper organized, according to APA and the assignment instructions?
3. Does the author make use of headings? 4. Are the basic sections adequate? Do they make sense?
5. Does the paper have a table of contents and abstract? Do they make sense? b. Argument . Is the thesis in the first paragraph?
Does it make an argument? 2. Is the thesis clear and comprehensive? 3. Did the author make use of the higher levels of Blooms Taxonomy?
4. Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear, and easy to follow? 5. Does the content examine or argue the topic problem the problem and discus alternative perspectives? 6.
Is there a conclusion? Is it clear and concise? 7. Does the conclusion summarize the arguments? Does it make new arguments?
8. Are all assertions adequately supported? c. Citations & Support . Does the writer make use of in-text citations and all in-text sources are cited adequately and appropriately use APA formatting in reference list? 2.
Does the writer cite sources adequately and appropriately use APA formatting in reference list? 3. Is work cited paraphrased and not took verbatim from source? 4. Is there an excessive amount of direct or block quoted material?
5. Are there enough references to other sources? 6. Are the references relevant, and credible? d. Grammar & Style .
Are there any grammatical or spelling problems? 2. Is the writing style clear, concise, and easy to read? 3. Was the writing scholarly? e.
Plagiarism . Did SafeAssign find evidence of plagiarism? 2. Was the plagiarism egregious, taken from excessive quoted material, or taken from reference material? Total 180 Instructor Comments:
Paper For Above instruction
The provided rubric outlines the comprehensive evaluation criteria for the final research paper in CJUS 310, offering detailed benchmarks across various aspects including organization, argumentation, citations, grammar, and originality.
Effective organization is foundational to academic writing, and the paper must adhere strictly to assignment instructions such as using the correct submission link, properly naming the file, and submitting on time. The paper should follow APA guidelines meticulously, incorporating clear headings, appropriate sections, a table of contents, and an abstract that logically align with the content. Proper structuring facilitates clarity, making the paper accessible and easy to navigate for readers.
The core of the assignment emphasizes a strong and clear thesis statement positioned within the first paragraph, which must present an arguable claim. The thesis should be comprehensive, setting the tone for the paper’s argument and analysis. The paper must utilize higher-order thinking skills as per Bloom's Taxonomy, demonstrating analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of information.
Logical and coherent progression of ideas is crucial, with material ordered in a manner that enhances readability and understanding. The content should not only present the problem but also critically examine it, discussing alternative perspectives to provide a balanced view. Conclusions should be concise, summarizing key arguments without introducing new content, and should demonstrate critical reflection on the topic.
Supporting assertions with adequate evidence is essential. This involves integrating in-text citations correctly formatted in APA style and including a reference list that supports all claims. Citations should paraphrase appropriately, avoiding excessive direct quotations or block quotes, and citing relevant, credible sources to strengthen arguments.
From a stylistic perspective, the paper should exhibit excellent grammar and spelling, maintaining a scholarly tone throughout. Clear, concise language enhances readability and professionalism. The writing style should reflect academic rigor, demonstrating mastery of language and subject matter.
Originality is monitored through plagiarism detection tools such as SafeAssign. The submission must be free of plagiarized content—either egregious or subtle—and demonstrate originality in ideas and presentation. Excessive quoting or improper paraphrasing constitutes a violation of academic integrity, which could negatively impact the overall evaluation.
In summary, the rubric aims to ensure that the final research paper exhibits thorough organization, well-supported arguments, proper citations, polished language, and academic integrity. Achieving excellence across all these categories will lead to a high-quality submission that reflects scholarly effort and critical engagement with the research topic.
References
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
- Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Co Inc.
- Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They say / I say: The moves that matter in academic writing. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Jones, M. (2019). Academic writing and research. Journal of Higher Education, 91(2), 219–234.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
- Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
- Purdue Online Writing Lab. (2023). APA style introduction. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html
- Horkoff, J., & Harris, L. (2022). Structuring research papers for clarity. Journal of Academic Writing, 10(1), 45-59.
- Williams, J. M. (2019). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace. University of Chicago Press.
- Zhu, H. (2021). The importance of citations in scholarly work. International Journal of Educational Research, 107, 101747.