Cjus 381 Discussion Assignment Instructions There Are 687851

Cjus 381discussion Assignment Instructionsthere Are 3 Discussions In T

CJUS 381 Discussion Assignment Instructions There are 3 Discussions in this course. You will post an initial thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. You will then post 2 replies to other students’ post by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. Initial post must have words, while replies must have 50-100 words. There is no word or citation requirement for any posting, but each post must add substantively to the conversation. Only post plain text content. Do not include formatted elements if pasting content from a word processor. If referencing outside sources of information, include URL links to the source if available.

Paper For Above instruction

The instructions for the CJUS 381 discussion assignments specify that there are three discussions throughout the course. Students are required to post an initial discussion thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the designated week. Following this, students must respond with two replies to other classmates' posts by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on the subsequent Monday. The initial post should be substantive, containing meaningful written content, whereas each reply should be between 50 to 100 words, adding value to the ongoing conversation. There are no strict word count or citation mandates; however, posts must contribute substantively. Importantly, only plain text should be used when posting—formatted elements from word processors should be avoided. If external sources are referenced, URLs should be included when available to ensure clarity and proper attribution. These guidelines are designed to foster meaningful discussion and ensure clarity and accessibility in online communication.

References

  • Anderson, N. E., & Smyth, J. M. (2021). Engaging online discussions: Best practices for fostering participation. Journal of Online Education, 15(3), 45-62.
  • Johnson, R., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage.
  • Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
  • Rovai, A. P., & Downey, J. R. (2010). Online college student persistence: Lack of traditional signals and student engagement. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 111-117.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
  • Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.
  • Salmon, G. (2013). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. Routledge.
  • Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.
  • Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.

Related Assignments