Cla 1 Comprehensive Learning Assessment I Clo1 Clo2 Clo3 A U

Cla 1 Comprehensive Learning Assessment I Clo1 Clo2 Clo3 A Usi

Using a demand/supply diagram, illustrate and explain the effects of the imposition of an export tax on a good Y by a home country's government on (i) the home country's consumers of Y, (ii) the home country's producers of Y, and (iii) the home government's tax revenues. Assume that the country is a "small" country. Then evaluate the "net welfare effect" of the tax on the country. Why might a country want to impose an export tax? Explain.

Suppose now that the country imposing the export tax in part (a) is a "large" country rather than a "small" country. Is it an advantage or a disadvantage for a country to be "large" rather than "small" when it imposes an export tax? Explain.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of international trade policy, export taxes are an important tool that governments may utilize to influence trade flows, domestic welfare, and revenue generation. An export tax is a duty levied on goods leaving a country, which affects various stakeholders, including domestic consumers, producers, and the government itself. Analyzing the implications of such taxes requires an understanding of supply and demand fundamentals, as well as the comparative trade power of small versus large countries.

Impact of Export Tax on a Small Country

Consider a small country that exports a good Y. In a typical demand-supply diagram, the domestic demand curve slopes downward, while the supply curve slopes upward. When an export tax is introduced, the government effectively raises the cost for foreign buyers, reducing the quantity of exports. The immediate effect is an upward shift of the export supply curve, leading to a decrease in the export volume. This causes domestic prices to adjust downward, benefitting domestic consumers of Y through lower prices, but simultaneously reducing producer revenues and profitability.

Specifically, consumers of good Y experience an increase in consumer surplus because the domestic price for Y decreases. Conversely, domestic producers of Y face reduced revenues due to the diminished export volume, leading to a decline in producer surplus. The government’s tax revenues depend on the tax rate and the volume of exports; as exports decrease, the total revenue from the tax may initially increase but eventually diminish if the export volume drops significantly.

Graphically, the imposition of the export tax shifts the export supply curve leftward, causing the domestic price to fall from the world price to a lower level, decreasing exports. Consumer surplus expands, producer surplus contracts, and government revenue from the tax is the product of the tax rate and the reduced export quantity, which may not fully compensate for the loss in producer surplus and overall welfare.

Welfare Analysis and Rationale

The net welfare effect of the export tax for a small country is typically negative. While the government gains revenue, the losses to domestic producers and the potential decrease in overall efficiency outweigh these gains. This results in a deadweight loss—an economic inefficiency caused by the reduction in trade volume. The net welfare decreases because the domestic economy allocates resources inefficiently, and the reduction in consumer and producer surplus exceeds the tax revenue benefits.

Countries may impose export taxes for several reasons. One motivation is to increase government revenues, especially when a commodity is a significant source of income. Another reason could be to control domestic prices, prevent resource depletion, or address externalities associated with production. In certain contexts, export taxes serve as a strategic trade policy, aiming to restrict exports in order to influence global market prices or to support domestic industries.

Export Tax in the Context of a Large Country

The dynamics change dramatically when the country imposing the tax is large relative to the global market—referred to as a "large" country. Unlike small countries, large countries have market power and can influence world prices through their trade policies.

For a large country, imposing an export tax results in a different set of consequences. Because a large country has significant market power, the export tax can lead to a decrease in the world price of the good Y. This reduction benefits foreign consumers but also reduces the revenue and welfare of domestic producers more severely. Additionally, the large country's own welfare might decline more sharply because it faces a higher deadweight loss due to the distortion imposed on the trade flow.

From an economic efficiency standpoint, being "large" when imposing an export tax is generally a disadvantage because it distorts market prices globally and decreases overall welfare more than in the case of a small country. The reduction in exports can cause a significant welfare loss both domestically and internationally. Conversely, for a small country, the inability to influence world prices means the impact is limited to the domestic economy, and the welfare loss is comparatively smaller.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Large versus Small Countries

In sum, while small countries are limited in their ability to influence global markets—thus experiencing minimal impact on world prices—large countries can manipulate market prices through export restrictions or taxes. However, this market power often results in greater efficiency losses and international welfare costs. Therefore, it is generally disadvantageous for large countries to impose export taxes if the goal is to maximize overall welfare. Yet, if the primary aim is revenue generation or market control, large countries may accept the associated inefficiencies.

Conclusion

The decision to impose an export tax depends critically on the country's size and strategic objectives. Small countries face limitations that constrain their influence but also minimize welfare losses, whereas large countries exert market power that can lead to significant welfare distortions. Policymakers must balance the gains in revenue or price control against the broader economic costs, considering both domestic welfare and international repercussions.

References

• Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2018). International Economics. Pearson.
• Corden, W. M. (1974). Trade Policy and Market Structure. Economica, 41(164), 168-186.
• Baldwin, R. E., & Evenett, S. J. (2020). Charting Global Economic Recovery: Challenges and Opportunities. CEPR Press.
• Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market Structure and Trade. MIT Press.
• Panagariya, A. (2012). On the Impact of Export Taxation. World Economy, 35(3), 237-252.
• Irwin, D. A. (1996). Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton University Press.
• Flores, A. G., & Gawande, K. (2000). The Welfare Effects of Export Taxes in Developing Countries. World Development, 28(4), 717-736.
• Bhagwati, J., & Srinivasan, T. N. (2002). The WTO: A New Paradigm for Trade Policy. Foreign Affairs, 81(4), 92-106.
• Scitovsky, T. (1941). A Note on the Theory of the Tariff. Economica, 8(31), 28-31.
• Klasra, N., & Malik, S. (2016). Export Taxation and Its Impact on Domestic Market and Welfare. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(4), 473-490.