Classic Evaluation: Top Load Title And Broader Context

Classic Evaluation1 Top Load Title2 Broader Context Why Are We

Evaluate a specific subject by establishing clear criteria, supporting each judgment with verifiable evidence such as facts and expert testimony, addressing opposing viewpoints, and concluding with a summary that revisits your initial assessment and criteria. Begin by providing a broader context explaining why the evaluation is relevant.

Paper For Above instruction

In this evaluation, I will analyze the process of choosing a graduate writing program, specifically focusing on the selection of the University of Montana in Missoula. This choice was driven by several carefully considered criteria, underscored by extensive research and personal experience. The broader context emphasizes the importance of such evaluations amid numerous options and the significance of choosing an environment conducive to academic and personal growth for writers. My approach involves establishing specific criteria, making judgments supported by evidence, addressing counterarguments, and ultimately reaffirming the overall decision based on comprehensive evaluation.

The first criterion involved the faculty’s reputation. I prioritized programs where renowned authors served as professors, believing that exposure to successful writers would enhance my development and improve my prospects in the publishing industry. Montana’s faculty, featuring William Kittredge, Beverley Lowry, Richard Hugo, and James Welch, was exemplary. Their association with the program was compelling enough to be validated through library research and personal correspondence. For instance, I tracked down copies of their books—Kittredge’s "We Are Not In This Together," Lowry’s "Daddy’s Girl," and Richard Hugo’s "The Lady in Kicking Horse Reservoir"—which confirmed their academic and literary stature. The inclusion of highly regarded poets, such as Mark Strand as a visiting poet laureate, further strengthened Montana’s reputation. The evidence indicates Montana exceeded my expectation in this criterion, providing access to accomplished and influential writers.

The second criterion was the program’s suitability for families, as I had two young children. Montana, located in Missoula and surrounded by natural beauty, offered a family-friendly environment. Supporting this judgment, I evaluated crime statistics through newspaper archives, police conversations, and online sources (Neighborhoodscout, FBI data, and personal verification via police officers), confirming Missoula’s status as one of the safest urban areas in Montana and the United States. The lower crime rates, coupled with the town’s amenities and community resources, made it an ideal environment for raising children while pursuing graduate studies. This evidence solidifies Montana’s alignment with the family-focused criterion, validating my choice.

The third criterion centered on the environment’s supportiveness, especially for non-traditional students and writers of my age. I wanted a community rich in peer support and mentorship. Interestingly, through a police interview, I learned that the police captain, Robert Sims Reid, was a graduate of the program. He confirmed that approximately one-third to one-half of the students were non-traditional, with many having their BAs for over a decade. This anecdotal evidence, coupled with observations of the community and university, affirmed that Montana fostered a diverse, mature, and supportive atmosphere conducive for serious writers. Together, the academic and personal testimonials supported the conclusion that Montana was an optimal choice for my circumstances.

Addressing opposing views, some might argue that Montana’s remote location and the small-town environment could hinder networking and access to opportunities. However, I counter this with evidence of the program’s strong faculty, its connections with industry professionals through alumni like William Kittredge, and the success stories of students who transitioned into notable careers. Furthermore, concerns about safety were addressed through personal research confirming Missoula’s low crime rates—an aspect verifiable by police and FBI data—demonstrating that the town provided a secure environment conducive to academic focus.

In conclusion, after assessing all criteria—faculty caliber, family friendliness, and a supportive environment—I reaffirm my choice of the University of Montana. Each criterion was supported by verifiable, credible evidence, and the community’s attributes aligned well with my personal and professional goals as a writer. The decision was reinforced by firsthand interactions and documented data, confirming that Montana offered an environment where my academic ambitions and family life could flourish harmoniously.

References

• "Crime in the United States." The FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation. U.S. Department of Justice, n.d. Web. 21 Feb 2013.
• "Crime Rates for Missoula, MT." Neighborhoodscout. Location Inc., n.d. Web. 21 Feb 2013.
• Hanson, David. "In Trash Fight, Some Progress." North Shore News [North and West Vancouver], 10 Oct 1987.
• "Missoula Kindergarten Honored Nationally." City of Missoula, Missoula School District 11.
• Sims Reid, Cpt. Telephone interview. June 1989.
• William Kittredge, personal correspondence and bibliographical references.
• Richard Hugo, bibliographies and literary reviews.
• Mark Strand, visitation and literary contributions.
• University of Montana Graduate Program Literature Faculty Profiles.
• Additional online databases and municipal safety reports supporting community safety and amenities.