College Of Administrative And Financial Sciences Assi 097044

College Of Administrative And Financial Sciencesassignment 3principles

Read the case “Norwegian Air Shuttle Aspires to Become the Cheapest Global Airline” at the end of Chapter 4 “Global Management” in your textbook Management: A Practical Approach 7th edition by Kinicki, A., & Williams, B. and answer the following questions:

  1. What are the biggest challenges Norwegian experienced in trying to expand its airline across the globe? (2.5 marks)
  2. To what extent did you observe examples of ethnocentric, polycentric, or geocentric attitudes in this case? Provide examples to support your conclusions. (2.5 marks)
  3. Use Table 4.4 to identify cultural differences that are likely to arise between Norwegian employees working in Denmark and Sweden and Thailand. How might these differences affect interpersonal interactions, and what can the company do to reduce any unintended conflict from these differences? (3 marks)
  4. What are the most important lessons to be learned about global management from this case? Discuss. (2 marks)

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Global expansion presents numerous challenges for airlines like Norwegian Air Shuttle, especially in their pursuit to become the cheapest global airline. As the airline industry becomes increasingly interconnected, airlines encounter operational, regulatory, cultural, and strategic hurdles that can impede their international growth. This paper explores the major challenges faced by Norwegian, analyzes potential attitudes toward international management, examines cultural differences among Scandinavian and Asian employees, and distills critical lessons for global management based on this case scenario.

Challenges in Norwegian’s Global Expansion

One of the primary challenges Norwegian faced while expanding internationally was navigating the complex regulatory environments across different countries. Aviation regulations are highly restrictive and vary significantly, requiring Norwegian to adapt to diverse safety standards, licensing procedures, and operational restrictions. Such variances can delay expansion plans and increase compliance costs. Additionally, differences in labor laws and union regulations across countries like the UK, Spain, and the US presented operational challenges, including negotiations over wages, working conditions, and labor relations.

Another significant challenge was intense competition from established airlines that already had strong footholds in international markets. Competing on price while maintaining profitability necessitated innovative cost-cutting strategies, such as operating a highly efficient low-cost model. Moreover, Norwegian's attempt to establish a solid brand reputation globally required substantial marketing efforts and customer service adaptations in different cultural contexts.

Operational challenges also included managing a geographically dispersed fleet and crew, which posed scheduling difficulties and increased logistical complexity. Maintaining safety standards and consistent quality across all international routes further added to operational burdens. These challenges collectively posed significant hurdles in Norwegian's aspiration to build a cost-effective, widespread global network.

Attitudes Toward International Management: Ethnocentric, Polycentric, or Geocentric?

In assessing Norwegian’s approach, it appears that the airline initially exhibited an ethnocentric attitude, characterized by a belief that the company's home-country practices could be universally applied. For example, Norwegian’s marketing strategies, customer service standards, and operational procedures were primarily based on Norwegian standards, with limited adaptation to local customs and preferences. This approach reflects an ethnocentric view that the headquarters' way is the best.

However, as Norwegian expanded into different countries, evidence of a polycentric attitude becomes apparent. The airline started to tailor its services, marketing, and operations in accordance with specific local market needs. For instance, Norwegian adapted its pricing strategies, flight routes, and in-flight services to suit local tastes and regulations. This localization demonstrates a polycentric management approach, where local subsidiaries operate semi-autonomously following local customs.

Over time, Norwegian appears to be shifting toward a geocentric attitude, aiming to integrate the best practices worldwide and view the international operation as a cohesive system. This is evident in their efforts to standardize certain operational procedures while still allowing regional adaptations, emphasizing global efficiency combined with sensitivity to local cultural nuances. Such a perspective fosters a unified corporate identity while respecting diversity.

Cultural Differences and Their Impact on Interpersonal Interactions

Using Table 4.4, we can analyze cultural dimensions impacting Norwegian employees working in Denmark, Sweden, and Thailand. Scandinavian countries like Denmark and Sweden generally score lower on power distance, indicating flatter organizational hierarchies and a preference for participative decision-making. In contrast, Thailand, with a higher power distance, may favor hierarchical structures and authority-based interactions.

In Denmark and Sweden, employees likely value equality, open communication, and consensus-building, which facilitates collaborative teamwork. Meanwhile, Thai employees might interpret hierarchical cues differently, expecting more authoritative leadership and formal interactions, which could lead to misunderstandings or perceived rigidity.

Uncertainty avoidance differences further compound interactions; Scandinavians tend to be comfortable with uncertainty and change, fostering innovation and flexibility. Thai employees may prefer clear rules and predictability, potentially resisting rapid changes or ambiguous directives. Such differences can lead to conflict if not properly managed.

To mitigate these issues, Norwegian can implement cross-cultural training programs emphasizing mutual understanding and communication styles. Encouraging intercultural dialogue and creating platforms for feedback can improve interpersonal relations, minimizing misunderstandings. Leadership development that recognizes and adapts to cultural expectations is also essential in fostering a harmonious multicultural work environment.

Lessons in Global Management

The Norwegian case offers valuable lessons for global managers. First, understanding cultural dimensions is crucial; managers must recognize that different cultural attitudes toward hierarchy, uncertainty, and individualism significantly influence workplace behavior. Tailoring management styles accordingly can enhance cooperation and efficiency.

Second, adopting a flexible management approach that shifts between ethnocentric, polycentric, and geocentric orientations as context demands is vital. While a centralized strategy offers consistency, local responsiveness ensures relevance in diverse markets. Balance and adaptability are key in global expansion endeavors.

Third, effective cross-cultural communication and conflict management skills are indispensable. Managers should foster cultural intelligence to navigate differences smoothly, thus promoting a cohesive organizational culture globally.

Fourth, strategic planning must incorporate cultural insights to design market entry strategies, personnel policies, and customer service practices suited to local preferences. Such strategic alignment enhances brand acceptance and operational success.

Finally, fostering organizational learning and continuous improvement in managing diversity will build resilience and facilitate sustainable global operations. Norwegian's experience underscores that successful international expansion hinges on the capacity to understand and adapt to cultural differences while maintaining core organizational values and strategic objectives.

Conclusion

Norwegian Air Shuttle's pursuit of global expansion reveals significant operational and cultural challenges, alongside critical lessons for global management. Recognizing the importance of cultural awareness, adaptable management approaches, and strategic localization are essential for success in international markets. As Norwegian strives to be the most cost-effective global airline, its experience underscores the necessity of balancing global efficiency with local responsiveness to navigate the complex landscape of international aviation successfully.

References

  • Javidan, M., & House, R. J. (2001). Cultural Acumen for the Global Manager: Lessons from Project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 289–305.
  • Kinicki, A., & Williams, B. (2019). Management: A Practical Approach (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications.
  • Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). The evolution of Hofstede's doctrine. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 18(1), 11–32.
  • Thomas, D. C. (2008). Cultural Intelligence: Surviving and Thriving in the Global Village. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(1), 1–23.
  • Bird, A., & Mendenhall, M. (2016). Global & International Management. Routledge.
  • Adler, N. J. (2008). Cultural Dialogues and International Business: New Perspectives. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(1), 7–10.
  • Osland, J. S., & Bird, A. (2000). Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context. Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 65–77.