Communication Styles: A Self-Assessment Exercise

Communication Styles A Self Assessment Exercise (Based on the work of

Communication Styles: A Self-Assessment Exercise (Based on the work of P Case “Teaching for the Cross-Cultural Mind”, Washington, DC, SIETAR, 1981) Instructions: Please select from each pair of attributes the one which is most typical of your personality. No pair is an either-or proposal. Make your choice as spontaneously as possible. There is no wrong answer.

Identify your characteristic preferences from the listed pairs, selecting the attribute that best reflects your personality. The exercise aims to understand your communication style across four main categories: WHAT, HOW, WHY, and WHO—each representing different aspects of communication. By analysing your responses, you can better understand your natural tendencies and how they influence your interactions. Additionally, recognizing your style can help improve communication with others by adapting approaches to different personalities, especially in cross-cultural settings.

The assessment involves choosing one attribute from each pair, totaling up to a maximum of 20 points per style, with the combined total reaching 40. The four styles—WHAT, HOW, WHY, and WHO—reflect distinct communication patterns, ranging from results-oriented to relationship-focused, innovative to systematic, and emotional to logical. Understanding these styles enables more effective interpersonal communication and teamwork, particularly in diverse environments.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective communication is a fundamental aspect of human interaction, influencing personal relationships, workplace dynamics, and cross-cultural exchanges. The Self-Assessment Exercise based on P. Case’s work offers a structured approach to understanding individual communication styles by categorizing behaviors into four primary dimensions: WHAT, HOW, WHY, and WHO. In this paper, I will explore each of these dimensions, analyze my personal responses, and discuss how awareness of one's style can enhance interpersonal understanding and effectiveness in various contexts.

Introduction to Communication Styles

The concept of communication styles posits that individuals tend to have consistent patterns of talking, listening, and interacting that shape their approach to conveying and receiving messages. These styles are not rigid boxes but flexible frameworks; people often exhibit a blend of these styles depending on circumstances. Recognizing one's dominant style, as well as understanding others’ styles, is vital for effective communication, especially in multicultural and team settings. The four main styles delineated by the exercise provide insights into whether a person is results-driven, process-oriented, relationship-focused, or idea-centered.

The Four Communication Styles

1. What Style: Results and Action

Individuals with a predominant 'What' style focus on objectives, achievements, and efficiency. They talk about tangible results and prefer direct, brief communication that emphasizes practicality. Characteristics include a results-oriented mindset, decisiveness, and an impulsive or energetic approach. Such individuals value productivity and challenge themselves and others to meet targets. They thrive in situations where action and immediate outcomes are prioritized, often bypassing excessive details or emotional considerations.

2. How Style: Process and Organization

The 'How' style is characterized by a systematic and organized approach. People with this style emphasize procedures, logical analysis, and accuracy. They prefer to plan, analyze cause and effect, and follow step-by-step actions. Patience and attention to detail are hallmarks, and these individuals value data, proof, and methodical work. Their reactions tend to be cautious, and they methodically assess information before making decisions, ensuring thoroughness and clarity.

3. Why Style: People and Relationships

Those who resonate with the 'Why' style center their communication on relationships, feelings, and understanding others’ needs. They are empathetic, warm, and sensitive to emotional cues. This style champions cooperation, team harmony, and subjective, values-based communication. They seek to build trust and are motivated by fostering relationships, perceiving communication as an art of creating and maintaining human connections. They often prioritize emotional intelligence and social cohesion over task completion alone.

4. Who Style: Ideas and Innovation

The 'Who' style revolves around concepts, creativity, and visionary thinking. These individuals are imaginative, innovative, and challenge conventional thinking. They enjoy exploring new methods, avenues, and possibilities, often engaging in brainstorming and design. Their communication is driven by the desire for progress and novelty, and they are often inspired by big-picture ideas and potential. They value inspiration and are motivated by understanding new trends and creating original solutions.

Analysis of Personal Responses and Style Balance

Upon completing the assessment, I found that my responses predominantly aligned with the 'What' and 'Why' styles. I tend to prioritize results and efficiency while also valuing positive relationships and emotional understanding. This blend enables me to be goal-oriented while remaining empathetic, facilitating effective teamwork. Conversely, I demonstrate some characteristics of the 'How' and 'Who' styles, especially in creative problem-solving and systematic planning, suggesting a versatile communication approach.

Understanding that individuals tend to have a dominant style with secondary influences offers valuable insights. For example, my tendency to focus on outcomes and relationships assists me in leading projects while maintaining harmony within teams. Awareness of my style helps me communicate more effectively across diverse contexts, tailoring my approach to suit colleagues or clients with different preferences.

Implications for Cross-Cultural and Team Communication

In multicultural environments, recognizing and adapting to various communication styles is essential. For instance, results-driven individuals ('What') may prefer swift, action-oriented exchanges, whereas relationship-focused persons ('Why') might seek more personal connection before discussing tasks. Similarly, process-oriented ('How') individuals value detailed plans, which might conflict with the rapid decisiveness of 'What' styles. By understanding these differences, one can modify communication approaches—for example, providing clear results for 'What' types, detailed data for 'How' types, relationship-building for 'Why' types, and innovative ideas for 'Who' types.

This adaptability fosters mutual respect, minimizes misunderstandings, and enhances collaboration, especially in cross-cultural teams where communication norms vary significantly. Training programs that incorporate awareness of these styles can equip team members to navigate differences effectively, leading to increased productivity and cohesion.

Practical Strategies for Enhancing Communication

Effective communication involves tailoring messages to align with the recipient's preferred style. For 'What' style individuals, focusing on outcomes and being concise is key; for 'How' style, providing structured information and logical reasoning is vital; for 'Why' styles, emphasizing emotional impact and relationship benefits helps; and for 'Who' styles, highlighting creativity and future possibilities can be persuasive. Additionally, developing flexibility to shift between styles as needed improves adaptability and reduces friction.

Furthermore, self-awareness of one's dominant style allows for reflective practice. Recognizing when one's communication approach may not resonate with others leads to conscious adjustments. For example, an 'Action' oriented person might learn to incorporate more details when working with systematic ('Process') types, fostering better understanding and cooperation.

Conclusion

The self-assessment exercise based on P. Case's model provides a valuable framework for understanding personal communication preferences. By identifying whether one is primarily result-driven, process-oriented, relationship-focused, or idea-centered, individuals can enhance their interpersonal effectiveness. This understanding is particularly crucial in diverse and multicultural environments, where adapting communication styles can bridge gaps and foster collaboration. Embracing the multidimensionality of communication styles and cultivating flexibility enhances not only professional success but also interpersonal harmony. Developing awareness of these styles and applying tailored communication strategies can significantly improve interactions, reduce conflict, and build stronger teams in any setting.

References

• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99-112.
• DeVito, J. A. (2019). The interpersonal communication book (14th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Fisher, R., & Brown, S. (1988). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. Anchor Books.
• Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Routledge.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Likert, R. (1967). The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. McGraw-Hill.
• Neuliep, J. W. (2017). Intercultural Communication: A Contexts Approach. Sage Publications.
• Schultz, D., & Schultz, S. E. (2010). A History of Modern Psychology (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and Social Behavior. McGraw-Hill.