Compare And Contrast Freud's View Of The Unconscious 250102

Compare and contrast Freud's view of the unconscious with Jung's view and

One of the first cases that caught Freud’s attention when he was starting to develop his psychoanalytic theory was that of Anna O., a patient of fellow psychiatrist Josef Breuer. Although Freud did not directly treat her, he analyzed her case thoroughly, fascinated by the fact that her hysteria was “cured” by Breuer. Her case is considered foundational to the development of psychoanalytic approaches. Analyzing Anna O.'s case provides insight into Freud’s psychoanalytic theory and allows for comparison with Jung’s neo-psychoanalytic perspectives. This paper compares and contrasts Freud’s and Jung’s views on the unconscious, applying them to the case of Anna O., and discusses how each theorist might approach her treatment, including specific interventions and considering her personal history.

Comparison of Freud’s and Jung’s Views on the Unconscious

Freud’s conception of the unconscious is central to his psychoanalytic theory. He viewed it as a repository of repressed desires, unacceptable impulses, and memories that are kept out of conscious awareness but influence behaviour significantly. Freud divided the unconscious into the id, ego, and superego, with the id representing primal instincts and the most primitive part of personality, operating largely outside of conscious awareness. He believed that unconscious conflicts, especially those rooted in childhood experiences, manifest through neurotic symptoms like Anna O.’s hysteria (Freud, 1915). The unconscious in Freud’s model is primarily focused on unresolved conflicts between instinctual drives and societal constraints, often resulting in repression and neurotic symptoms.

Jung’s view of the unconscious expands upon Freud’s ideas, emphasizing its more dynamic and compensatory role. Jung distinguished between the personal unconscious, similar to Freud’s concept, and the collective unconscious—a layer shared across humanity containing archetypes or universal symbols and motifs. Jung saw the unconscious as a source of potential wisdom and growth, not merely repressed conflicts. For Jung, unconscious contents could manifest as symbolic and meaningful images, which could aid in psychological development (Jung, 1964). In contrast to Freud, Jung saw unconscious material as not solely repressive but also as containing positive potential for individuation—a process of self-realization and integration.

Points of Agreement and Disagreement Regarding the Unconscious in Anna O.’s Case

Freud and Jung would agree that Anna O.’s symptoms stem from unconscious processes—such as repressed trauma or conflicts—that manifest physically and psychologically. Freud might interpret her hysteria as a result of repressed painful memories related to her close association with her father and her emotional struggles during his illness and death. Jung, meanwhile, could see her hallucinations and symbolic expressions—like her hair ribbons turning into snakes—as manifestations of archetypes from the collective unconscious or as part of her individuating process seeking expression (Jung, 1964).

However, their disagreements revolve around the origin and purpose of these unconscious influences. Freud would emphasize the repressive mechanisms causing Anna O.’s symptoms, advocating for uncovering and resolving repressed conflicts through techniques like free association and dream analysis. Jung would see these symptoms as meaningful expressions of her inner journey, potentially leading her toward self-awareness and wholeness, thus embracing her hallucinations and symbolic content as meaningful messages rather than mere symptoms to eliminate (Jung, 1964).

Approach to Treatment and Specific Interventions

Freud’s approach to treating Anna O. would likely focus on bringing unconscious conflicts into conscious awareness. Techniques such as free association—encouraging her to speak freely about her thoughts—and dream analysis could uncover repressed memories and unresolved conflicts, such as her grief over her father and her emotional struggles. The goal would be to resolve these conflicts by making them conscious and integrating them into her personality, reducing the neurotic symptoms (Freud, 1915). Psychodynamic therapy would involve exploring her childhood experiences and resolving the repressed emotions associated with her symptoms.

Jung’s approach, in contrast, might incorporate interpretation of symbolic material, dreams, and active imagination. He might focus on facilitating Anna O.’s awareness of archetypal symbols emerging in her hallucinations and dreams, encouraging her to integrate these symbols into her conscious awareness as part of her individuation process. Jung would view her symptoms as meaningful signals guiding her toward personal growth. Interventions might involve exploring the symbolic content of her hallucinations, encouraging her to find personal significance in them, and promoting her self-discovery (Jung, 1964).

Impact on Anna’s Experience of Treatment

Considering her history, including her close emotional bond with her father, her symptoms’ manifestation, and her cultural background, Anna might respond differently to each approach. Freudian therapy might trigger her to confront painful repressed memories, potentially causing initial distress but ultimately leading to symptom relief. She might feel overwhelmed or resistant if she perceives the process as intrusive. On the other hand, Jungian therapy, emphasizing symbolic understanding and personal meaning, might resonate with her hallucinations and cultural expressions, fostering acceptance and engagement with her inner symbols. This process could facilitate her individuation, promoting a sense of growth and wholeness rather than focusing solely on symptom eradication.

Conclusion

The case of Anna O. exemplifies the differing perspectives of Freud and Jung regarding unconscious processes. Freud's view sees unconscious conflicts as the root of neurotic symptoms, emphasizing the importance of uncovering repressed memories through psychoanalysis. Jung, however, considers the unconscious as a font of wisdom and growth, full of symbols and archetypes that can guide the individual toward self-realization. Both approaches offer valuable insights and interventions, but their differing emphases highlight the importance of tailoring treatment to individual needs, acknowledging the depth and complexity of unconscious influences in mental health.

References

• Freud, S. (1915). The Unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 159-204). Hogarth Press.
• Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and His Symbols. Aldine Publishing Company.
• Hurst, L. C. (1982). What was wrong with Anna O.? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 75(2), 129–131.
• Schopen, P. (1999). The Freud/Jung Controversies: Their History, Their Significance, and Their Resolution. Routledge.
• McLeod, S. (2018). Freud’s Psychoanalytic Theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/Sigmund-Freud.html
• Stein, M. (1998). Jung's View of the Unconscious. In P. Beischel & M. P. de S. Gcosta (Eds.), Analytical Psychology and the Study of the Unconscious.
• Vodach, B. (2015). The Impact of Psychoanalytic Theory on Psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(3), 218–225.
• Hoffman, E. (2000). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton University Press.
• Kalff, A. (2003). Sandplay: A Psychotherapeutic Approach to the Psyche. North Atlantic Books.
• Vargas, G. & McLeod, S. (2020). The Development of Psychoanalytic Thought. Journal of Historical Psychology, 23(4), 201-215.