Compare And Contrast Typical Accounting Information Systems
Compare And Contrast Typical Accounting Information Systems In A Sm
Compare and contrast typical Accounting Information Systems in a small (under $2 million sales, 10 employees) company versus a large (over $100 million sales, 20,000 employees) company in terms of Information Systems (hardware & software), IT department structure, and internal controls.
Many business activities do not result in an accounting transaction; i.e., they do not affect the general ledger. Accepting a customer order or signing a contract with FedEx for shipping services are examples. Identify two or three more examples. Why would managers and investors be interested is these activities?
Paper For Above instruction
Accounting Information Systems (AIS) are vital frameworks that support the processing of financial and operational data within organizations. The structure, complexity, and functionality of AIS differ significantly between small and large companies, influenced by their scale, resources, and operational needs. This essay compares and contrasts typical AIS in small and large companies concerning their hardware and software systems, IT department structure, and internal controls, while also exploring activities that do not generate accounting transactions and their importance to managers and investors.
Comparison of AIS in Small and Large Companies
Hardware and Software
Small companies typically operate with straightforward, cost-effective hardware setups—such as basic servers, desktops, and minimal networking infrastructure—paired with off-the-shelf accounting software like QuickBooks or Sage. These systems are generally designed to meet basic bookkeeping and financial reporting requirements, offering user-friendly interfaces with limited customization options. The hardware infrastructure is often managed by a single individual or a small team, with minimal specialized IT hardware beyond essentials.
In contrast, large corporations deploy highly sophisticated and scalable hardware infrastructure, including enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems like SAP or Oracle, which integrate various business processes across multiple locations globally. These systems tend to be server-based with extensive data centers, redundant power supplies, and comprehensive cybersecurity measures to protect vast reservoirs of sensitive data. The software used in large firms is often highly customizable, supporting complex reporting, data analytics, and compliance requirements, often integrated with other enterprise systems.
IT Department Structure
Small organizations usually have a lean IT department or may outsource IT functions entirely to external providers. The personnel responsible for AIS often handle multiple roles—from technical support to system upkeep—focusing on ensuring basic system operation. Their skill set is generally broad but limited to core functions, reflecting the organization's limited scale and IT needs.
Large companies, by contrast, have dedicated, specialized IT departments structured into several functional units, including systems analysts, network administrators, cybersecurity teams, and database managers. These departments work collaboratively to manage complex systems, implement security protocols, perform routine maintenance, and develop custom solutions aligned with strategic business goals. The size and expertise of the IT team ensure that the organization can handle large data volumes, maintain system uptime, and adapt rapidly to technological advances and regulatory changes.
Internal Controls
Internal controls in small firms are often simple, relying on manual controls and basic segregation of duties to prevent errors and fraud. Given limited staff and resources, small businesses might implement manual approval processes and basic password protections. However, their internal control frameworks are less extensive and more vulnerable to misstatements or fraud risks.
Large firms implement comprehensive internal control frameworks guided by regulations such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). These include automated controls within ERP systems, segregation of duties across different personnel, rigorous audit trails, continuous monitoring, and regular internal audits. The complexity and scale of their internal control systems are designed to ensure compliance, safeguard assets, and provide reliable financial reporting vital for investor confidence.
Activities Not Resulting in Accounting Transactions and Their Significance
Many operational activities do not directly impact the general ledger but are essential components of business operations. For example, accepting a customer order involves gathering customer information, verifying credit, and scheduling delivery—activities that are vital for revenue generation but may not immediately reflect in the financial statements. Similarly, signing a contract with FedEx for shipping services initiates logistical processes that ensure customer satisfaction and operational efficiency but may not be captured as an accounting transaction until invoicing or payment processing occurs.
Additional examples include employee onboarding and training, which contribute to human capital development without affecting the financial ledger until expenses are recognized; or procurement of office supplies, where ordering occurs long before the supplies are received and expenses are recorded.
Managers and investors are interested in these activities because they directly influence operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and strategic positioning. For example, a delay in order processing can result in lost sales, impacting revenues and market share, which investors want to monitor. Contracting with a reliable shipping provider ensures timely delivery, customer satisfaction, and repeat business—elements critical for revenue stability and growth. Recognizing these activities allows managers to optimize operational processes, reduce risks, and make informed strategic decisions—ultimately influencing the company's financial health and investor confidence.
Conclusion
In conclusion, AIS in small and large organizations differ markedly in hardware and software complexity, departmental structure, and internal control rigor—reflecting their operational scales and resource availability. While small firms operate with simple, often manual frameworks, large corporations employ advanced ERP systems and specialized teams to safeguard assets and ensure compliance. Additionally, understanding business activities that do not directly generate accounting entries provides valuable insights into operational effectiveness and strategic risk management, offering crucial information to managers and investors aiming for sustainable growth.
References
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., Albrecht, C. O., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2021). Auditing and Assurance Services. McGraw-Hill Education.
Bierstaker, J., Brody, R. G., & Pacini, C. (2001). Accountants’ perceptions regarding fraud prevention and detection methods. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(2), 94-101.
Granlund, M. (2011). Extending AIS research: A review of the field and directions for the future. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(4), 304-319.
innlegg, A., & Storey, C. (2019). ERP systems and their impact on organizational internal controls. Journal of Information Systems, 33(2), 121-139.
Ladipo, A. (2017). Internal controls in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 8(7), 115-123.
McLeod, R. (2020). Operating activities and financial reporting. Accounting Review, 95(1), 25-38.
Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2018). Accounting Information Systems. Pearson.
Scott, J., & Seitzinger, J. (2014). Implementing internal control frameworks in large organizations. Internal Auditor Journal, 70(3), 45-52.
Wolf, G. (2022). The role of AIS in strategic management. Management Accounting Quarterly, 24(2), 12-19.
Zyburt, R., & Johnson, R. (2019). Business process activities not captured in financial statements: Operational insights for managers. Strategic Finance, 101(4), 45-51.